Welcome, Guest. Login or register to use the forums.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 16, 2010, 07:32:12 AM
Home Help Search Login Register
GCM Home | Bible Search | Rules | Bookstore | Support | Newsletter


+  Christian Forums
|-+  Christian Interests
| |-+  Organized Religion and Religious Movements Discussions
| | |-+  Protestantism
| | | |-+  Arminianism
| | | | |-+  Can man come to Jesus in and of their own freewill?
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 ... 49 Go Down Print
Author Topic: Can man come to Jesus in and of their own freewill?  (Read 27400 times)
Gracious
Senior Member
****

Manna: 26
Offline Offline

Mood:

Posts: 610


Blog entries (0)

View Profile
« Reply #90 on: June 02, 2008, 01:51:35 AM »

Is someone here saying we have no choice???  I'm just confused reading these posts, I guess.  Everyone chooses God I think we can agree, that to me is not the issue......The issue is that choice is providential, it cannot be made unless and until God first chooses us.  We have no way to choose Him in and of ourselves.

Don, I think we agree on that, except I believe God draws everyone.

Joh 3:16  "For God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life.

I believe God does love the whole world, not just parts of it, and he wills and draws all to him. The difference I believe all of mankind has a free will choice to accept or reject. I don't believe God has predestined some for hell. That would make him a respector of persons which he said he is not.

Scripture clearly says God draws man first. We agree on that. I just don't believe there is selective drawing and by definition selective condemnation on God's part. Man condemns himself. God has offered all salvation.

It's like the example I have used before. All acorns are predestined to become oak trees, but not all will.
Jaime, your reasoning might  sound good but How do you account for the fact that about a third of the world has never even heard the Gospel? Paul asks a rhetorical question in Rom 10:14 . "And how can they believe in the one they have not heard?" Also in vs. 17 he states that "faith comes thru hearing the word of God."

Both of you raise interesting (thought provoking) arguments. 

Before I received Jesus The Christ as my Lord & Savior, something within me knew that there was a power within my being that was far greater than I could comprehend.  I knew without knowing (being told by another human-being) that this power gave me life – gave all of us life, that this power connected us to each other and that this power is good.  That all I need do to excel at anything I put my mind to, was to tap into that Power.  All of this was pre-salvation for me.  Perhaps, after listening & talking to many world-wide … I am not alone in my thinking?

As Christ-followers we are all charged to “spread” the “Good News” of our Deity to all nations.  If this is so … “How will they hear us”?  How will they identify (make personal) what it is that we are saying?  Perhaps the answer to such a question would be … that “we” in & of ourselves can not!  Why?  Because true “permanent” life altering change (BACK to our Creator) does NOT come from man … it comes from GOD (who is Spirit) working through man.  Therefore, true Gospel preaching-teaching comes only from HIS Spirit through our spirit, and can only be met by & through the “spirit” of others. Once received  THEN  the process of KNOWING HIM via HIS written Word can begin.

Here’s my meaning,

Upon visiting India a while ago, the Holy Ghost taught me an invaluable lesson:

On my knees in worship, BEFORE leaving this country, I asked GOD to help me to be a beacon of light to them who are lost.  Little did I know that the 1st soul that GOD chose to fix the heart of (on this journey) was mine; by simply revealing to me that nowhere in HIS Inspiration (The Holy Bible), did HE constrain me to LEAD souls to CHRIST by spouting scripture to a People of a land whose "primary" religious, philosophical and cultural system is Hindu – Hinduism, who may not yet have been spiritually conditioned to hear / receive me.  In other words, I could go to this foreign land – bible & smiles ready … arrogance & ignorance availing, as if I were some kind of superman sent to save the day … for these poor lost souls!!!

OR

I could choose a more humble & more honorable approach, by resuming a posture that observes respectfully their culture.  And in doing so … MY visual testimony of (prayerfully) a  RIGHTEOUS HUMILITY could be SEEN – FIRST!  THEN, this People -  might receive The Spirit that sent me, from within their hearts ... netting to  “the body” an evangelism towards the WAY of TRUTH (JESUS THE CHRIST) via HIS WORD!!!

All of this to say … If you believe that we are spirit of HIS Spirit FIRST, then THAT is how you begin your ministry.  The fact that a third of the world has never heard or heard of The Gospel, need not be a discouraging or perplexing factor because what has been poured into you from above, is sweet & unforgettable & in the heart of everyman.  We tap into this Divine Sweetness through HIS agape love & HE will handle everything else.

Quote
Now, can man come to Jesus in & of his own freewill?

Perhaps in even asking such a question … is to think of ourselves too highly?  To even correlate our inherently flawed thinking with that of our Creator truly misses the mark.  To even entertain a line of thinking that says that we are smart enough to make an eternal decision “in & of our own freewill” … as in without HIS presence (The Holy Ghost) working for us / through us, on our behalf … speaks to the kind of arrogant thinking that caused lucifer’s plounder.


Logged
Bonnie
Legendary Member
******

Manna: 334
Online Online

Mood:

Gender: Female
Posts: 8150


Blog entries (0)

View Profile
« Reply #91 on: June 02, 2008, 05:34:03 AM »

Quote
My concept of free will to chose or reject God does not in anyway imply that we can choose not to sin. Which of course we CAN"T not sin. Two different things totally.
Jaime,
If you can choose God, then surely you can choose to stop sinning.  Both possibilities make a liar out of the Holy Spirit (and the Apostle John).

John 1:12 Yet to all who received him, to those who believed in his name, he gave the right to become children of God— 13children born not of natural descent, nor of human decision or a husband's will, but born of God.

1 John 1:8 If we claim to be without sin, we deceive ourselves and the truth is not in us.

Why do you accept the truth of the second writing but appear to reject the truth of v13 in the first writing? 
Smile

We can't live in the flesh and not sin I don't think. The Scriptures aren't contradicting themselves, there's a difference between continued and willful sin or loving sin.
« Last Edit: June 02, 2008, 06:20:23 AM by Bonnie » Logged

Psalms 118:24  "This is the day which the LORD hath made; we will rejoice and be glad in it."
Christian Forums
« Reply #91 on: June 02, 2008, 05:34:03 AM »

 Logged
BornToReign
Global Modifier
Senior Member
****

Manna: 54
Offline Offline

Mood:

Gender: Male
Posts: 1315

Blog entries (0)

View Profile
« Reply #92 on: June 02, 2008, 06:45:26 AM »

Quote
My concept of free will to chose or reject God does not in anyway imply that we can choose not to sin. Which of course we CAN"T not sin. Two different things totally.
Jaime,
If you can choose God, then surely you can choose to stop sinning.  Both possibilities make a liar out of the Holy Spirit (and the Apostle John).

John 1:12 Yet to all who received him, to those who believed in his name, he gave the right to become children of God— 13children born not of natural descent, nor of human decision or a husband's will, but born of God.

1 John 1:8 If we claim to be without sin, we deceive ourselves and the truth is not in us.

Why do you accept the truth of the second writing but appear to reject the truth of v13 in the first writing? 
Smile

We can't live in the flesh and not sin I don't think. The Scriptures aren't contradicting themselves, there's a difference between continued and willful sin or loving sin.

You cant sin if your in Christ. You are dead to sin. Ill explain more later.
Logged

Right believing gives birth to right living.
da525382
Guest
« Reply #93 on: June 02, 2008, 07:33:41 AM »

Is someone here saying we have no choice???  I'm just confused reading these posts, I guess.  Everyone chooses God I think we can agree, that to me is not the issue......The issue is that choice is providential, it cannot be made unless and until God first chooses us.  We have no way to choose Him in and of ourselves.

Don, I think we agree on that, except I believe God draws everyone.

Joh 3:16  "For God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life.

I believe God does love the whole world, not just parts of it, and he wills and draws all to him. The difference I believe all of mankind has a free will choice to accept or reject. I don't believe God has predestined some for hell. That would make him a respector of persons which he said he is not.

Scripture clearly says God draws man first. We agree on that. I just don't believe there is selective drawing and by definition selective condemnation on God's part. Man condemns himself. God has offered all salvation.

It's like the example I have used before. All acorns are predestined to become oak trees, but not all will.

Yes, Jaime, you delineate Arminianism to the tee.  It's hard to know where to begin with your post.  It is based on presumptions that do not reflect the concept of scriptural predestination or election, but obviously something only you have been told.  And, of course, all of your presumptions must be scripturally established to pass the validity test, or they're just interesting conversation.

For example, stating that man has a free will means nothing except what you define it to be.  There is no mention of "free will" scripturally except as a "free will" offering in the Old Testament.  Man absolutely has no "free will" of any kind scripturally, he serves either the prince of darkness or God, there is no inbetween, no neutrality scripturally.  I would like to see the scriptural establishment of your use and definition of "free will".

God draws all men of all nations, the gospel goes out to Jew and Gentile alike.  Nowhere does scripture state that all men individually are drawn, for they would therefore then be saved, that then becomes universalism, which is the extrapolation of your reasoning.  Not all men have ever been saved, not all men are saved now, nor will all men ever be saved in the future.  Universalism is an invention of the mind of man.  It sounds nice and logical to his concept of "fairness", a secular humanistic-type mindset, however, it exists nowhere in scripture.

John 3:16 similarly does not preach universalism, which seems to be your point here.  Only those who believe upon Him shall not perish.  It is the same concept as "many are called, few are chosen".   Everyone of us deserves condemnation.  We have all condemned ourselves.  This has nothing to do scripturally with God choosing to condemn anyone....he passes over those He has not elected.  He could have just left us all alone to our own eternal destruction which we all possessed, but because and only because of His grace, He always intended not to.....Otherwise, the use of the word "elect" would have no meaning whatsoever in scripture.  It is a word based in the concept of choice, and choice is a fundamental characteristic of God.....he is a God of choice.

« Last Edit: June 02, 2008, 07:53:26 AM by da525382 » Logged
DCR
Global Moderator
Lee's Inner Circle Member
*****

Manna: 423
Offline Offline

Mood:

Gender: Male
Posts: 11083

Blog entries (0)

View Profile
« Reply #94 on: June 02, 2008, 07:38:55 AM »

Is someone here saying we have no choice???  I'm just confused reading these posts, I guess.  Everyone chooses God I think we can agree, that to me is not the issue......The issue is that choice is providential, it cannot be made unless and until God first chooses us.  We have no way to choose Him in and of ourselves.

Don, I think we agree on that, except I believe God draws everyone.

Joh 3:16  "For God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life.

I believe God does love the whole world, not just parts of it, and he wills and draws all to him. The difference I believe all of mankind has a free will choice to accept or reject. I don't believe God has predestined some for hell. That would make him a respector of persons which he said he is not.

Scripture clearly says God draws man first. We agree on that. I just don't believe there is selective drawing and by definition selective condemnation on God's part. Man condemns himself. God has offered all salvation.

It's like the example I have used before. All acorns are predestined to become oak trees, but not all will.
Jaime, your reasoning might  sound good but How do you account for the fact that about a third of the world has never even heard the Gospel? Paul asks a rhetorical question in Rom 10:14 . "And how can they believe in the one they have not heard?" Also in vs. 17 he states that "faith comes thru hearing the word of God."

...which is why Jesus commanded His disciples to go into all the world and preach the gospel to "every creature."  Romans 10:14-15 continues on to say, And how can they hear without someone preaching to them? And how can they preach unless they are sent? As it is written, "How beautiful are the feet of those who bring good news!"

As you point out from Romans 10, faith comes through hearing the word of God.

This fits in with John 6:44-45, which says, "No one can come to me unless the Father who sent me draws him, and I will raise him up at the last day. It is written in the Prophets: 'They will all be taught by God.' Everyone who listens to the Father and learns from him comes to me.

Now, did the original disciples literally go into all the world and preach the gospel to each and every person in the world?  Has this ever happened?  I would venture to say no.  What of those in the world who have never heard and will never hear the gospel?  The Bible is somewhat silent on those folks.  So, any conjecture on that changes nothing in this discussion, IMO.  The bottom line is that God desires us to go to everyone in the world and preach the gospel (thus, His drawing is extended to everyone in the world since He has commanded the disciples to bring the word to everyone in the world)... whether we accomplish that to the fullest extent or not.
« Last Edit: June 02, 2008, 07:52:41 AM by DCR » Logged
Jaime
(Pronounced Hi-Me, not Ja-Me)
Global Moderator
Lee's Inner Circle Member
*****

Manna: 380
Online Online

Mood:

Gender: Male
Posts: 13380


I am a genius you know!

Blog entries (1)

View Profile
« Reply #95 on: June 02, 2008, 08:49:08 AM »

Is someone here saying we have no choice???  I'm just confused reading these posts, I guess.  Everyone chooses God I think we can agree, that to me is not the issue......The issue is that choice is providential, it cannot be made unless and until God first chooses us.  We have no way to choose Him in and of ourselves.

Don, I think we agree on that, except I believe God draws everyone.

Joh 3:16  "For God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life.

I believe God does love the whole world, not just parts of it, and he wills and draws all to him. The difference I believe all of mankind has a free will choice to accept or reject. I don't believe God has predestined some for hell. That would make him a respector of persons which he said he is not.

Scripture clearly says God draws man first. We agree on that. I just don't believe there is selective drawing and by definition selective condemnation on God's part. Man condemns himself. God has offered all salvation.

It's like the example I have used before. All acorns are predestined to become oak trees, but not all will.

Yes, Jaime, you delineate Arminianism to the tee.  It's hard to know where to begin with your post.  It is based on presumptions that do not reflect the concept of scriptural predestination or election, but obviously something only you have been told.  And, of course, all of your presumptions must be scripturally established to pass the validity test, or they're just interesting conversation.

For example, stating that man has a free will means nothing except what you define it to be.  There is no mention of "free will" scripturally except as a "free will" offering in the Old Testament.  Man absolutely has no "free will" of any kind scripturally, he serves either the prince of darkness or God, there is no inbetween, no neutrality scripturally.  I would like to see the scriptural establishment of your use and definition of "free will".

God draws all men of all nations, the gospel goes out to Jew and Gentile alike.  Nowhere does scripture state that all men individually are drawn, for they would therefore then be saved, that then becomes universalism, which is the extrapolation of your reasoning.  Not all men have ever been saved, not all men are saved now, nor will all men ever be saved in the future.  Universalism is an invention of the mind of man.  It sounds nice and logical to his concept of "fairness", a secular humanistic-type mindset, however, it exists nowhere in scripture.

John 3:16 similarly does not preach universalism, which seems to be your point here.  Only those who believe upon Him shall not perish.  It is the same concept as "many are called, few are chosen".   Everyone of us deserves condemnation.  We have all condemned ourselves.  This has nothing to do scripturally with God choosing to condemn anyone....he passes over those He has not elected.  He could have just left us all alone to our own eternal destruction which we all possessed, but because and only because of His grace, He always intended not to.....Otherwise, the use of the word "elect" would have no meaning whatsoever in scripture.  It is a word based in the concept of choice, and choice is a fundamental characteristic of God.....he is a God of choice.


Don, my only point I was trying to make and I'm sure I didn't do a good job of it it that the Gospel is good nows to all men. If some are predestined to hell, then it's not good news to them.

I don't believe in universalism in the sense that all will be saved, I do believe all have an opportunity to be saved. As to the people in the world that someone else brought up that haven't heard the Gospel, God will have to sort that out.

Yes there is a conflict in God wanting that all be saved and the concept of the elect. I don't understand it all for sure, but just because elect is mentioned and God loving the "whole world" so much he gave his son is mentioned, elect does not cancel out the other nor vice versa. I still believe it is Both/And not either/or.

I will let others debate this century's old debate because I admit I don't have all the answers. The one answer I believe I do know is that the Gospel is good news for ALL men.
Logged

Proverbs 3: 5-6  Trust in the Lord with all your heart and lean not on your own understanding. In all your ways acknowledge Him and He will make your paths straight.

                                          
CLICK HERE ---->My New Blog
Christian Forums
« Reply #95 on: June 02, 2008, 08:49:08 AM »

 Logged
JerryW
Member
***

Manna: 17
Offline Offline

Mood:

Posts: 324

Blog entries (0)

View Profile
« Reply #96 on: June 02, 2008, 09:16:10 AM »

Is someone here saying we have no choice???  I'm just confused reading these posts, I guess.  Everyone chooses God I think we can agree, that to me is not the issue......The issue is that choice is providential, it cannot be made unless and until God first chooses us.  We have no way to choose Him in and of ourselves.

Don, I think we agree on that, except I believe God draws everyone.

Joh 3:16  "For God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life.

I believe God does love the whole world, not just parts of it, and he wills and draws all to him. The difference I believe all of mankind has a free will choice to accept or reject. I don't believe God has predestined some for hell. That would make him a respector of persons which he said he is not.

Scripture clearly says God draws man first. We agree on that. I just don't believe there is selective drawing and by definition selective condemnation on God's part. Man condemns himself. God has offered all salvation.

It's like the example I have used before. All acorns are predestined to become oak trees, but not all will.
Jaime, your reasoning might  sound good but How do you account for the fact that about a third of the world has never even heard the Gospel? Paul asks a rhetorical question in Rom 10:14 . "And how can they believe in the one they have not heard?" Also in vs. 17 he states that "faith comes thru hearing the word of God."

...which is why Jesus commanded His disciples to go into all the world and preach the gospel to "every creature."  Romans 10:14-15 continues on to say, And how can they hear without someone preaching to them? And how can they preach unless they are sent? As it is written, "How beautiful are the feet of those who bring good news!"

As you point out from Romans 10, faith comes through hearing the word of God.

This fits in with John 6:44-45, which says, "No one can come to me unless the Father who sent me draws him, and I will raise him up at the last day. It is written in the Prophets: 'They will all be taught by God.' Everyone who listens to the Father and learns from him comes to me.

Now, did the original disciples literally go into all the world and preach the gospel to each and every person in the world?  Has this ever happened?  I would venture to say no.  What of those in the world who have never heard and will never hear the gospel?  The Bible is somewhat silent on those folks.  So, any conjecture on that changes nothing in this discussion, IMO.  The bottom line is that God desires us to go to everyone in the world and preach the gospel (thus, His drawing is extended to everyone in the world since He has commanded the disciples to bring the word to everyone in the world)... whether we accomplish that to the fullest extent or not.
DCR  You say the Bible is silent on the fate of those that have not heard the Gospel, but the answer is in John 3:18 where it says "whoever does not believe stands condemned already"  I have found out that this is sometimes a rather touchy subject when it should not be. It is directly from God's word and is quite clear. I realize many might not like this answer because it does not make God out to be "fair." But where in the Bible does it say God has to be fair?  Afterall what is the incentive for sending out evangelist and missionaries if one can be saved without hearing the Gospel?
Logged
Jimmy
Legendary Member
******

Manna: 170
Offline Offline

Mood:

Posts: 6035

Blog entries (0)

View Profile
« Reply #97 on: June 02, 2008, 09:25:31 AM »

Dave,

I am reluctant to continue this discussion.  The differences in thinking here are bound up by more than simple differences in interpretation of the scriptures.  It is clear from the article that you posted that the very words and phrases used in discussion are fraught with inferred meaning and innuendo, an example being "fallen, unregenerate man" or "unless the Holy Spirit sovereignly applies that word to the heart" .  I could point to a lot of others, but that will do.

But the closing paragraph might illustrate the point of inference and innuendo.  Hendryx says.

Let me conclude this discussion with a quote from the Council of Orange (529 AD). “…if anyone makes the assistance of grace depend on the humility or obedience of man and does not agree that it is a gift of grace itself that we are obedient and humble, he contradicts the Apostle who says, "What have you that you did not receive?" (1 Cor. 4:7), and, "But by the grace of God I am what I am" (1 Cor. 15:10).”

I  had a nice breakfast this morning.  I do consider that all I have is from God.  It is by the grace of God that I had food to eat this morning and that there is food on our shelves that will likely take us through several more meals if God wills.  But I can tell you for certain, that food was not placed sovereignly on the table by the Holy Spirit.

It is obvious that when speaking, writing or discussing these subjects, there are words and phrases that virtually preclude effective communication.  To the effect that you obviously found Hendryx's article enlightening, while I found it obscured in reformed jargon and calvinese.
Logged
Jimmy
Legendary Member
******

Manna: 170
Offline Offline

Mood:

Posts: 6035

Blog entries (0)

View Profile
« Reply #98 on: June 02, 2008, 09:33:40 AM »

Is someone here saying we have no choice???  I'm just confused reading these posts, I guess.  Everyone chooses God I think we can agree, that to me is not the issue......The issue is that choice is providential, it cannot be made unless and until God first chooses us.  We have no way to choose Him in and of ourselves.

Don, I think we agree on that, except I believe God draws everyone.

Joh 3:16  "For God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life.

I believe God does love the whole world, not just parts of it, and he wills and draws all to him. The difference I believe all of mankind has a free will choice to accept or reject. I don't believe God has predestined some for hell. That would make him a respector of persons which he said he is not.

Scripture clearly says God draws man first. We agree on that. I just don't believe there is selective drawing and by definition selective condemnation on God's part. Man condemns himself. God has offered all salvation.

It's like the example I have used before. All acorns are predestined to become oak trees, but not all will.
Jaime, your reasoning might  sound good but How do you account for the fact that about a third of the world has never even heard the Gospel? Paul asks a rhetorical question in Rom 10:14 . "And how can they believe in the one they have not heard?" Also in vs. 17 he states that "faith comes thru hearing the word of God."

...which is why Jesus commanded His disciples to go into all the world and preach the gospel to "every creature."  Romans 10:14-15 continues on to say, And how can they hear without someone preaching to them? And how can they preach unless they are sent? As it is written, "How beautiful are the feet of those who bring good news!"

As you point out from Romans 10, faith comes through hearing the word of God.

This fits in with John 6:44-45, which says, "No one can come to me unless the Father who sent me draws him, and I will raise him up at the last day. It is written in the Prophets: 'They will all be taught by God.' Everyone who listens to the Father and learns from him comes to me.

Now, did the original disciples literally go into all the world and preach the gospel to each and every person in the world?  Has this ever happened?  I would venture to say no.  What of those in the world who have never heard and will never hear the gospel?  The Bible is somewhat silent on those folks.  So, any conjecture on that changes nothing in this discussion, IMO.  The bottom line is that God desires us to go to everyone in the world and preach the gospel (thus, His drawing is extended to everyone in the world since He has commanded the disciples to bring the word to everyone in the world)... whether we accomplish that to the fullest extent or not.
DCR  You say the Bible is silent on the fate of those that have not heard the Gospel, but the answer is in John 3:18 where it says "whoever does not believe stands condemned already"  I have found out that this is sometimes a rather touchy subject when it should not be. It is directly from God's word and is quite clear. I realize many might not like this answer because it does not make God out to be "fair." But where in the Bible does it say God has to be fair?  Afterall what is the incentive for sending out evangelist and missionaries if one can be saved without hearing the Gospel?

To believe implies having heard.  One cannot believe or not believe in something he knows nothing about.  That is why we are to go and teach.

DCR is exactly correct, God has not said what His plans are for those who have not heard.  We know only what is in store for those who hear and either believe or reject.
Logged
DCR
Global Moderator
Lee's Inner Circle Member
*****

Manna: 423
Offline Offline

Mood:

Gender: Male
Posts: 11083

Blog entries (0)

View Profile
« Reply #99 on: June 02, 2008, 09:34:02 AM »

Afterall what is the incentive for sending out evangelist and missionaries if one can be saved without hearing the Gospel?

Just for the sake of discussion, I could rephrase that question and ask... what is the incentive for sending out evangelists and missionaries if God has already determined who will be saved regardless of what we do?

Where God being "fair" is concerned, perhaps the closest thing to that is when we read passages such as Acts 10:34-35, which says:

Opening his mouth, Peter said: "I most certainly understand now that God is not one to show partiality, but in every nation the man who fears Him and does what is right is welcome to Him."

(or "God is no respecter of persons" as the KJV says)

There, the condition seems to fall back on man fearing God and doing what is right (which we must be careful with, lest someone get the impression that Peter is teaching works-based salvation there, since as the KJV says, "in every nation he that feareth him, and worketh righteousness, is accepted with him." Look around ).

As far as my statement goes about the Bible being silent on those who hear the Gospel... I was more referring to our hypothetical discussions we wrangle over, regarding the little boy in some remote tribe who will never hear the Gospel, or something of that nature.  Obviously, I didn't mean to suggest that one could be saved without the Gospel or through any other than Jesus Christ.  On the other hand, the "whoever does not believe" in John 3:18 could be said to refer to those who heard but refuse to believe.  But, I prefer to leave those things to the wisdom of God.

Logged
Christian Forums
« Reply #99 on: June 02, 2008, 09:34:02 AM »

 Logged
da525382
Guest
« Reply #100 on: June 02, 2008, 09:56:33 AM »

Is someone here saying we have no choice???  I'm just confused reading these posts, I guess.  Everyone chooses God I think we can agree, that to me is not the issue......The issue is that choice is providential, it cannot be made unless and until God first chooses us.  We have no way to choose Him in and of ourselves.

Don, I think we agree on that, except I believe God draws everyone.

Joh 3:16  "For God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life.

I believe God does love the whole world, not just parts of it, and he wills and draws all to him. The difference I believe all of mankind has a free will choice to accept or reject. I don't believe God has predestined some for hell. That would make him a respector of persons which he said he is not.

Scripture clearly says God draws man first. We agree on that. I just don't believe there is selective drawing and by definition selective condemnation on God's part. Man condemns himself. God has offered all salvation.

It's like the example I have used before. All acorns are predestined to become oak trees, but not all will.

Yes, Jaime, you delineate Arminianism to the tee.  It's hard to know where to begin with your post.  It is based on presumptions that do not reflect the concept of scriptural predestination or election, but obviously something only you have been told.  And, of course, all of your presumptions must be scripturally established to pass the validity test, or they're just interesting conversation.

For example, stating that man has a free will means nothing except what you define it to be.  There is no mention of "free will" scripturally except as a "free will" offering in the Old Testament.  Man absolutely has no "free will" of any kind scripturally, he serves either the prince of darkness or God, there is no inbetween, no neutrality scripturally.  I would like to see the scriptural establishment of your use and definition of "free will".

God draws all men of all nations, the gospel goes out to Jew and Gentile alike.  Nowhere does scripture state that all men individually are drawn, for they would therefore then be saved, that then becomes universalism, which is the extrapolation of your reasoning.  Not all men have ever been saved, not all men are saved now, nor will all men ever be saved in the future.  Universalism is an invention of the mind of man.  It sounds nice and logical to his concept of "fairness", a secular humanistic-type mindset, however, it exists nowhere in scripture.

John 3:16 similarly does not preach universalism, which seems to be your point here.  Only those who believe upon Him shall not perish.  It is the same concept as "many are called, few are chosen".   Everyone of us deserves condemnation.  We have all condemned ourselves.  This has nothing to do scripturally with God choosing to condemn anyone....he passes over those He has not elected.  He could have just left us all alone to our own eternal destruction which we all possessed, but because and only because of His grace, He always intended not to.....Otherwise, the use of the word "elect" would have no meaning whatsoever in scripture.  It is a word based in the concept of choice, and choice is a fundamental characteristic of God.....he is a God of choice.


Don, my only point I was trying to make and I'm sure I didn't do a good job of it it that the Gospel is good nows to all men. If some are predestined to hell, then it's not good news to them.

I don't believe in universalism in the sense that all will be saved, I do believe all have an opportunity to be saved. As to the people in the world that someone else brought up that haven't heard the Gospel, God will have to sort that out.

Yes there is a conflict in God wanting that all be saved and the concept of the elect. I don't understand it all for sure, but just because elect is mentioned and God loving the "whole world" so much he gave his son is mentioned, elect does not cancel out the other nor vice versa. I still believe it is Both/And not either/or.

I will let others debate this century's old debate because I admit I don't have all the answers. The one answer I believe I do know is that the Gospel is good news for ALL men.

And I agree, the debate will go on.  No one that I know of has ever argued that the gospel is not good news.  And no one has argued that it should not be preached to all men individually.  So, to me, that is a created strawman-type issue.

The other created issue, ISTM, is the use of "predestined for hell'.  That is not in any sense an accurate understanding of election.  That is a created nuance of argument that also is a strawman-type argument, ISTM. 

So, really I don't see your or my disagreement here.  The gospel is to be preached to everyone.  Not everyone will hear.  That is because they are not of the elect, the chosen of God.  That is my only point of difference perhaps with you.
Logged
Jaime
(Pronounced Hi-Me, not Ja-Me)
Global Moderator
Lee's Inner Circle Member
*****

Manna: 380
Online Online

Mood:

Gender: Male
Posts: 13380


I am a genius you know!

Blog entries (1)

View Profile
« Reply #101 on: June 02, 2008, 10:04:08 AM »

That's good to hear Don. But you know me after 30 or so threads of this subject, I can't leave well enough alone.  Smile

I guess as to the predestined for hell comment I made. It seems to me if some are predestined for heaven and some not. Then how are the one's that are not predestined for salvation............... ......not predestined for hell? I am sorry if I am using terminology that might seem damning to one point of view or the other, but I think in simple terms. If some are predestined for salvation, then what are the other's predestined for? My simple mind says it must be hell if not heaven.

I assume not purgatory!  Doh!
Logged

Proverbs 3: 5-6  Trust in the Lord with all your heart and lean not on your own understanding. In all your ways acknowledge Him and He will make your paths straight.

                                          
CLICK HERE ---->My New Blog
DCR
Global Moderator
Lee's Inner Circle Member
*****

Manna: 423
Offline Offline

Mood:

Gender: Male
Posts: 11083

Blog entries (0)

View Profile
« Reply #102 on: June 02, 2008, 10:11:11 AM »

And no one has argued that it should not be preached to all men individually.  So, to me, that is a created strawman-type issue.

Neither was anyone teaching universalism as some previous posts charged... which could be said to be another strawman-type issue.
Logged
Christian Forums
« Reply #102 on: June 02, 2008, 10:11:11 AM »

 Logged
James.
Global Moderator
King James Member
*****

Manna: 435
Offline Offline

Mood:

Gender: Male
Posts: 21066


With a smile on the face and a finger on the verse

Blog entries (0)

View Profile
« Reply #103 on: June 02, 2008, 10:20:18 AM »

I agree       Watching the show and eating popcorn
Logged

“Only he who believes is obedient and only he who is obedient believes.”
~ Dietrich Bonhoeffer
Jimmy
Legendary Member
******

Manna: 170
Offline Offline

Mood:

Posts: 6035

Blog entries (0)

View Profile
« Reply #104 on: June 02, 2008, 10:38:08 AM »

That's good to hear Don. But you know me after 30 or so threads of this subject, I can't leave well enough alone.  Smile

I guess as to the predestined for hell comment I made. It seems to me if some are predestined for heaven and some not. Then how are the one's that are not predestined for salvation............... ......not predestined for hell? I am sorry if I am using terminology that might seem damning to one point of view or the other, but I think in simple terms. If some are predestined for salvation, then what are the other's predestined for? My simple mind says it must be hell if not heaven.

I assume not purgatory!  Doh!

The word predestined is one of those words which I spoke about above concerning the article that Dave posted.  The word has become so engulfed in calvinese as to preclude free discussion.  It is an entire theology unto its own.  So much so that one cannot simply discuss a topic using the word without benefit of the all encompassing theology that is carried along with it.

The word like so many has baggage.
Logged
Can man come to Jesus in and of their own freewill? - Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 ... 49 Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  



Login with username, password and session length

Grace-Centered Christian Forums
Bible concordance | abortion ticker | is God real? | galaga | play tetris | copter game | mini golf games | arcade | donkey kong | Christian marriage help | articles | privacy
Powered by SMF | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC