Welcome, Guest. Login or register to use the forums.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 19, 2010, 07:29:54 PM
Home Help Search Login Register
GCM Home | Bible Search | Rules | Bookstore | Support | Newsletter


+  Christian Forums
|-+  Christian Interests
| |-+  Organized Religion and Religious Movements Discussions
| | |-+  Calvinism
| | | |-+  Arminianism (part 1)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 Go Down Print
Author Topic: Arminianism (part 1)  (Read 4395 times)
Jimmy
Legendary Member
******

Manna: 172
Online Online

Mood:

Posts: 6065

Blog entries (0)

View Profile
« Reply #105 on: September 21, 2009, 11:42:18 AM »

Skala,

Misquoting random fragments of verses does not an argument make. God wants EVERYONE to be saved (see Tim), including you and me.

Angelos, do you realize that you just did what you accused me of?  

You said:

Quote
Misquoting random fragments of verses does not an argument make.

And then you referenced a random fragment of a verse to make an argument:

Quote
God wants EVERYONE to be saved

And worse, that verse is being used out of context by you! (1 Tim 2:4)

Oh, the hypocrisy! Frowning

Please tell us, what is the context of 1 Tim 2:4.  Just what did Paul mean when he said that?

BTW, How do you figure that he referenced a random fragment of a verse?  I wouldn't bet my life on it, but I think you could find some indication that God wants everyone to be saved in most every book in the NT.  The hypocrisy here is that you think that God wants to save you but there are those He doesn't want to save.  Now that is real hypocrisy.  Maybe hypocrisy is not quite right.  Let's try arrogance or pride or conceit or puffed up or boastful or........
Logged
canuck
Member
***

Manna: 28
Offline Offline

Mood:

Posts: 391

Blog entries (0)

View Profile
« Reply #106 on: September 21, 2009, 02:00:42 PM »

That God wants all men to be saved yet does not save all men is part of the mystery of godliness related in 1 Tim. 3:16.

Can we humans sort this out? Hardly...We must accept Scripture as it stands without attempting to scrub out certain portions to suit our particular brand of theology.

Preach the truth and where the sovereignty of God and the responsibility of man is concerned, always assert both sides of the equation.

canuck
Logged
Christian Forums
« Reply #106 on: September 21, 2009, 02:00:42 PM »

 Logged
Jimmy
Legendary Member
******

Manna: 172
Online Online

Mood:

Posts: 6065

Blog entries (0)

View Profile
« Reply #107 on: September 21, 2009, 02:45:17 PM »

That God wants all men to be saved yet does not save all men is part of the mystery of godliness related in 1 Tim. 3:16.

Can we humans sort this out? Hardly...We must accept Scripture as it stands without attempting to scrub out certain portions to suit our particular brand of theology.

Preach the truth and where the sovereignty of God and the responsibility of man is concerned, always assert both sides of the equation.

canuck

Why do you think that we humans can't sort that out?  I don't find it particularly difficult to comprehend.  Given that God places conditions upon man in order to receive salvation that some refuse to meet answers that question perfectly.  No mystery there.  There are enough mysteries surrounding God's dealing with mankind without inventing additional ones.
Logged
skala
Member
***

Manna: 4
Offline Offline

Mood:

Posts: 106

Blog entries (0)

View Profile
« Reply #108 on: September 22, 2009, 10:24:54 AM »

I'm not so sure it's as cut and dry easy as you make it out to be Jimmy.   Let's be honest and deal with actual, real life facts.

If God wants all to be saved, why does God not make sure that 100% of the people that ever live at some point hear the gospel?  Millions of people live full lives and die without ever hearing the name of Jesus.  Much less a full, accurate gospel presentation that explains that we are guilty under God's law and that Christ Jesus's work on the cross is the only satisfactory atonement for sins in God's sight.

Why does God not paint the gospel in the clouds for all to see?  Remember, general revelation (ie, seeing the creation) is not sufficient for saving souls.  The gospel alone is the power of God unto salvation. 

Next, if God wants all to be saved, some of His actions are very curious.  For example, Christ tells us in Matthew 11 that Chorazin and Bethsaida were in trouble for not repenting.  But then Jesus tells us that the "mighty works" done in those cities, if they had been done in Tyre and Sidon, they most assuredly would have repented.  He also tells us if those mighty works would have been done in Sodom, it wouldn't have been destroyed:

Mat 11:21-24
(21)  "Woe to you, Chorazin! Woe to you, Bethsaida! For if the mighty works done in you had been done in Tyre and Sidon, they would have repented long ago in sackcloth and ashes.
(22)  But I tell you, it will be more bearable on the day of judgment for Tyre and Sidon than for you.
(23)  And you, Capernaum, will you be exalted to heaven? You will be brought down to Hades. For if the mighty works done in you had been done in Sodom, it would have remained until this day.
(24)  But I tell you that it will be more tolerable on the day of judgment for the land of Sodom than for you."


The question is this: If it was a certainty that Tyre and Sidon and Sodom would have repented if certain works had been done - by God - in them, why did God not do them? 

While you ponder that question, Jesus continues with an answer from the perspective of God's sovereignty and how He dispenses His grace in whatever way He wants to, hiding some things from some men and revealing some things to other men:

Mat 11:25-27
(25)  At that time Jesus declared, "I thank you, Father, Lord of heaven and earth, that you have hidden these things from the wise and understanding and revealed them to little children;
(26)  yes, Father, for such was your gracious will.
(27)  All things have been handed over to me by my Father, and no one knows the Son except the Father, and no one knows the Father except the Son and anyone to whom the Son chooses to reveal him.

While you may accuse me of being "disgusting" for believing in Sovereign grace and that God gives or withholds his grace whenever He wants, however He wants, Jesus in fact finds this fact a reason to stop in his tracks and worship. For some reason I just don't think you would have followed suit Jimmy.  Then he puts the nail in the coffin of the debate and outright says that nobody can know the Father unless the Son chooses to reveal the Father to that person. 

Curious that Jesus does not reveal the Father to every single person in human history, being that he wants them all to be saved. Curious that God does not do "mighty works" in certain places when He knows full well that it would result in repentance and salvation.

Next you should consider, oh, lets say, the entire course of human history in the old testament.  God revealed himself to Israel alone, and set his love upon them, and rescued them from paganism.  God handpicked Abraham alone, for no good reason other than a reason in God Himself, and gave him blessings and promises.  There were millions of people on earth at that time, and Abram was hand picked.

God left the other nations of the earth in total darkness and ignorance, never revealing himself to them.  He did not give them the laws, nor the prophets, nor promises, nor the sacrificial system.  I thought He wanted them all to be saved?  No, it sounds like God sovereignly dispensed his undeserved grace in whatever way he found fit.

Next consider that God says to Pharaoh:

"For this reason I raised you up, to show my power in you.."

So Pharaoh was raised to a position of authority and power for a reason.  "For this reason" I did this. Therefore you cannot say that God raised Pharaoh up with the plan of offering salvation to Pharaoh, but Pharaoh was in a position of pride and power such that he would not bow the knee to God. No, God says "For this reason I raised you up".  Pharaoh was in the position he was in on purpose. It was God's doing.  Could Pharaoh have suddenly repented, thwarting God's eternal plan to do what he wanted? God says "I raised you up on purpose to show my power in you" Tell me, at what point did God plan on saving Pharaoh and giving him grace and mercy?  If Pharaoh could have suddenly repented, does that mean God's plan of "raising him up on purpose to show his power in him" would have been thwarted? Would God have then said "I raised you up on purpose to show my power in you, but then you threw a wrench in my plans by repenting and believing!"

Then, consider this passage:

Rom 11:7-8
(7)  What then? Israel failed to obtain what it was seeking. The elect obtained it, but the rest were hardened,
(8)  as it is written, "God gave them a spirit of stupor, eyes that would not see and ears that would not hear, down to this very day."

It is interesting that God would actually give people eyes that cannot see and ears that cannot hear, when in fact he is desperately trying to save them all, and he wants them all to come to their senses and "be saved". Or maybe He isn't.  /shrug

Next we learn that Christ speaks in parables on purpose to hide the truth from some and reveal it to others.

Mat 13:10-14
(10)  Then the disciples came and said to him, "Why do you speak to them in parables?"
(11)  And he answered them, "To you it has been given to know the secrets of the kingdom of heaven, but to them it has not been given.
(12)  For to the one who has, more will be given, and he will have an abundance, but from the one who has not, even what he has will be taken away.
(13)  This is why I speak to them in parables, because seeing they do not see, and hearing they do not hear, nor do they understand.
(14) Indeed, in their case the prophecy of Isaiah is fulfilled that says: "'You will indeed hear but never understand, and you will indeed see but never perceive.

It is curious that the Old Testament example used by Jesus is one where God tells Isaiah that he will make people's hearts dull and blind their eyes so that they cannot see or hear or understand, so that they will not turn and be healed.  Isaiah asks "How long Lord?" And God answers "Until cities lie waste without inhabitant, and houses without people, and the land is a desolate waste.." (Isa 6:9-11)

Jesus speaks parables for the exact same reason that the event in Isa 6 happened: Because God was shutting eyes and ears, hiding the truth from some, a form of justice and punishment, because it pleased him to do that rather than giving mercy which is never owed.  But for some reason, I just don't think you would agree with God's decision here Jimmy.  You would protest to Jesus saying "that's disgusting! My god would never do that!" as you have so lovingly told me several times at my mention of believing in a God who sovereignly extends or withholds grace whenever He wants. ;)

Remember, these are not the opinions of a Calvinist Jimmy. These are facts that you and I must deal with.  These are facts that literally actually happened in the course of human history.  God does not makes sure the gospel reaches every single person that is alive.  Millions live and die without ever hearing the gospel.

Is that because God put all of his eggs in the basket of evangelists and missionaries and now it's not working out how he wanted?  Or is it because he has not determined to reveal Himself to and save 100% of all people in both Old and New Testaments?

A very interesting study nonetheless.
Logged
Jimmy
Legendary Member
******

Manna: 172
Online Online

Mood:

Posts: 6065

Blog entries (0)

View Profile
« Reply #109 on: September 25, 2009, 06:58:13 AM »

Yes, it is an interesting study.  And just as interesting is to see how you interpret various passages of scripture within the constraints of your own theology.  Of course we are all guilty of that aren't we.  But, the question that you have to ask yourself in this regard is whether the hardening is the original cause of their unbelief or whether it is punishment for their unbelief.  You can decide that for yourself and I can make a pretty good guess at what your decision would be.

But let's take a look at just one of the examples you cited- Romans 11.  If you look at it closely I think you will find the following facts concerning the hardening you speak of.  (1) Whatever the nature of the hardening, it is not the cause of anyone's unbelief.  The only ones hardened are those who have already rejected God's righteousness in Christ.  (2)  Whatever the nature of the hardening, it is not irrevocable and final.  Those hardened are still able to come to faith.  (3) God's purpose for this hardening is to use it as a means of converting many Gentiles, which in turn will be a means of converting many of the hardened Jews themselves.

So what we find is somewhat of a paradox in the sense that the ultimate goal and result of the hardening is the salvation of those who were hardened.  You can see this in the sequence of events laid out.  First the bulk of the Jews reject the Gospel, then they are hardened; as a result Gentiles are saved; and as a result of that many of the hardened Jews are made jealous and are saved; and as a consequence of that even more Gentiles are saved.

So needless to say, I don't find this to be any support for the reformed thinking of this as some eternal decree of reprobation that predestines some to hell (going along with the unconditional election that predestines others to heaven).

I could continue, but I will just end it by saying that I do not find in God the ogre of reprobation that you seem to see.

So yes, let's be honest and deal with the actual, real life facts.

One final note I would add.  You said
Quote
If God wants all to be saved, why does God not make sure that 100% of the people that ever live at some point hear the gospel?  Millions of people live full lives and die without ever hearing the name of Jesus.  Much less a full, accurate gospel presentation that explains that we are guilty under God's law and that Christ Jesus's work on the cross is the only satisfactory atonement for sins in God's sight.

It is important to note that we do not know how God intends to deal with those who have not and/or will not hear the Gospel at some point in their lives.  We know only that we have been told to preach and teach the Gospel to the world.  And we know the result of accepting or rejecting that Gospel.  Beyond that we do not know God's intentions.
Logged
zoonance
Legendary Member
******

Manna: 226
Offline Offline

Mood:

Gender: Male
Posts: 7934


Blog entries (0)

View Profile
« Reply #110 on: September 25, 2009, 08:00:27 AM »

maybe we aren't telling people.  Perhaps God will judge those who know and don't tell to a much higher standard than we would be comfortable to admit, with the souls of the untold on our heads.
Logged
Christian Forums
« Reply #110 on: September 25, 2009, 08:00:27 AM »

 Logged
Jimmy
Legendary Member
******

Manna: 172
Online Online

Mood:

Posts: 6065

Blog entries (0)

View Profile
« Reply #111 on: September 25, 2009, 11:05:44 AM »

I was going to let this one pass then decided not to. 

Next, if God wants all to be saved, some of His actions are very curious.  For example, Christ tells us in Matthew 11 that Chorazin and Bethsaida were in trouble for not repenting.  But then Jesus tells us that the "mighty works" done in those cities, if they had been done in Tyre and Sidon, they most assuredly would have repented.  He also tells us if those mighty works would have been done in Sodom, it wouldn't have been destroyed:

Mat 11:21-24
(21)  "Woe to you, Chorazin! Woe to you, Bethsaida! For if the mighty works done in you had been done in Tyre and Sidon, they would have repented long ago in sackcloth and ashes.
(22)  But I tell you, it will be more bearable on the day of judgment for Tyre and Sidon than for you.
(23)  And you, Capernaum, will you be exalted to heaven? You will be brought down to Hades. For if the mighty works done in you had been done in Sodom, it would have remained until this day.
(24)  But I tell you that it will be more tolerable on the day of judgment for the land of Sodom than for you."


The question is this: If it was a certainty that Tyre and Sidon and Sodom would have repented if certain works had been done - by God - in them, why did God not do them? 

The better question is how could that have possibly be true?  Either they had been among the sovereign elect and predestined before creation or they were not.  If they weren't then no amount of mighty works would have made any difference.  And what is Jesus thinking?  Did He not know who were the elect and who were not?  The passage you quote which you think supports one point in your theology seems to deny another.  I think that it doesn't support any aspect of your theology.

Is it not true that Chorazin and Bethsaida and Tyre and Sidon were, by eternal decree of reprobation, predestined to hell?
Logged
skala
Member
***

Manna: 4
Offline Offline

Mood:

Posts: 106

Blog entries (0)

View Profile
« Reply #112 on: September 25, 2009, 11:55:14 AM »

Quote
But, the question that you have to ask yourself in this regard is whether the hardening is the original cause of their unbelief or whether it is punishment for their unbelief.  You can decide that for yourself and I can make a pretty good guess at what your decision would be.

If your guess was that my answer is the latter, you would be wrong.   Hardening is always the punishment for unbelief, never the cause of unbelief.

You see, unbelief is what all men have, according to our fallen, sinful natures.  Therefore when God hardens men, it is justly done, not injustice.

But God doesn't always respond to unbelief with justice.  If he did so, all men would go to hell. Sometimes he responds with mercy and grace.  He mercifully softens hearts, changes hearts, and grants the gift of faith and repentance.

A person's salvation always depends on grace and nothing else.

My question is this.  If you agree with me that all men are guilty sinners before God and no men deserve mercy, but all men justly deserve to be hardened and sent to hell, why then do you mock that it is unjust of God to mercifully soften some men? (but not all men)

How can it be injustice that some are given mercy, not justice? Mercy is not a form of injustice.

To say that those hardened and given justice were treated unjustly or unfairly is to presuppose that men deserved mercy in the first place.

But mercy cannot be deserved.  That is the very definition of mercy: Undeserved kindness.
« Last Edit: September 25, 2009, 12:03:49 PM by skala » Logged
skala
Member
***

Manna: 4
Offline Offline

Mood:

Posts: 106

Blog entries (0)

View Profile
« Reply #113 on: September 25, 2009, 12:02:16 PM »


Is it not true that Chorazin and Bethsaida and Tyre and Sidon were, by eternal decree of reprobation, predestined to hell?

Very possible.  And God's means of accomplishing that end was to purposely not do the mighty works in them that would, guaranteed, lead to repentance.
Logged
zoonance
Legendary Member
******

Manna: 226
Offline Offline

Mood:

Gender: Male
Posts: 7934


Blog entries (0)

View Profile
« Reply #114 on: September 25, 2009, 12:07:46 PM »

 Tread mill Tread mill Tread mill
Logged
Christian Forums
« Reply #114 on: September 25, 2009, 12:07:46 PM »

 Logged
Jimmy
Legendary Member
******

Manna: 172
Online Online

Mood:

Posts: 6065

Blog entries (0)

View Profile
« Reply #115 on: September 25, 2009, 02:13:30 PM »

Quote
But, the question that you have to ask yourself in this regard is whether the hardening is the original cause of their unbelief or whether it is punishment for their unbelief.  You can decide that for yourself and I can make a pretty good guess at what your decision would be.

If your guess was that my answer is the latter, you would be wrong.   Hardening is always the punishment for unbelief, never the cause of unbelief.

You see, unbelief is what all men have, according to our fallen, sinful natures.  Therefore when God hardens men, it is justly done, not injustice.

But God doesn't always respond to unbelief with justice.  If he did so, all men would go to hell. Sometimes he responds with mercy and grace.  He mercifully softens hearts, changes hearts, and grants the gift of faith and repentance.

A person's salvation always depends on grace and nothing else.

My question is this.  If you agree with me that all men are guilty sinners before God and no men deserve mercy, but all men justly deserve to be hardened and sent to hell, why then do you mock that it is unjust of God to mercifully soften some men? (but not all men)

How can it be injustice that some are given mercy, not justice? Mercy is not a form of injustice.

To say that those hardened and given justice were treated unjustly or unfairly is to presuppose that men deserved mercy in the first place.

But mercy cannot be deserved.  That is the very definition of mercy: Undeserved kindness.

First we are not cursed with the total inability that you would claim.  You and your bogus fallen sinful natures.

Second, the injustice is the nonuniform application of (perceived) mercy.  If you come across an entire village that is starving to the point of death and you have the food to feed the entire village, it would not be counted as merciful if you withheld food from all but  one or two to whom you decided to give food.  At least not in my book.   But that is how you present the God of Calvin.  Enough food for ten villages, but only feed a couple of people.  And since you are the one being fed, you smile and call it mercy.  Go figure.
Logged
Jimmy
Legendary Member
******

Manna: 172
Online Online

Mood:

Posts: 6065

Blog entries (0)

View Profile
« Reply #116 on: September 25, 2009, 02:14:51 PM »


Is it not true that Chorazin and Bethsaida and Tyre and Sidon were, by eternal decree of reprobation, predestined to hell?

Very possible.  And God's means of accomplishing that end was to purposely not do the mighty works in them that would, guaranteed, lead to repentance.

Gross!!!
Logged
skala
Member
***

Manna: 4
Offline Offline

Mood:

Posts: 106

Blog entries (0)

View Profile
« Reply #117 on: September 25, 2009, 04:35:57 PM »

Your analogy of the starving villagers woefully misses the mark.

When we are talking about sinners, we are not talking about innocent people that need and deserve some help from fellow human beings. We are talking about guilty lawbreakers, enemies of God, deserving of eternal torture in hell, deserving of God's eternal hatred.  We are talking about people who deserve the kind of thing God Himself describes as justice in his own words:

Isa 63:3
(3)  I have trodden the winepress alone; and of the people there was none with me: for I will tread them in mine anger, and trample them in my fury; and their blood shall be sprinkled upon my garments, and I will stain all my raiment.

When we speak of fallen man, sinners, we are speaking of people that God is storing up wrath against so that he can crush them so much that their blood splatters and stains his clothes.

Now, if God were to give mercy to some of those people, then that is amazing grace indeed.  But he is not required to give any mercy.  None deserve salvation so it cannot possibly be unjust to withhold it from them.  But this is what you are arguing. Which means your presupposition can't be anything other than this: "All men deserve salvation."

Your analogy fails. Your presupposition (that men deserve salvation) is not Biblical.  You ignored the majority of the scriptural proofs/evidence that God does in fact withhold mercy.  He has every right to do so as it is undeserved to begin with. Stomping your feet saying "I don't like that!" and "That's gross!" doesn't do anything to advance your argument.  It's the very Bible that is saying these things.  It's not as if I wandered over to this board and wrote a bunch of fictional bible passages.  I copied those verses right out of the Bible itself.  It's the Bible you find "Gross".
Logged
Christian Forums
« Reply #117 on: September 25, 2009, 04:35:57 PM »

 Logged
Jimmy
Legendary Member
******

Manna: 172
Online Online

Mood:

Posts: 6065

Blog entries (0)

View Profile
« Reply #118 on: September 25, 2009, 04:57:47 PM »

Your analogy of the starving villagers woefully misses the mark.

When we are talking about sinners, we are not talking about innocent people that need and deserve some help from fellow human beings. We are talking about guilty lawbreakers, enemies of God, deserving of eternal torture in hell, deserving of God's eternal hatred.  We are talking about people who deserve the kind of thing God Himself describes as justice in his own words:

Isa 63:3
(3)  I have trodden the winepress alone; and of the people there was none with me: for I will tread them in mine anger, and trample them in my fury; and their blood shall be sprinkled upon my garments, and I will stain all my raiment.

When we speak of fallen man, sinners, we are speaking of people that God is storing up wrath against so that he can crush them so much that their blood splatters and stains his clothes.

Now, if God were to give mercy to some of those people, then that is amazing grace indeed.  But he is not required to give any mercy.  None deserve salvation so it cannot possibly be unjust to withhold it from them.  But this is what you are arguing. Which means your presupposition can't be anything other than this: "All men deserve salvation."

Your analogy fails. Your presupposition (that men deserve salvation) is not Biblical.  You ignored the majority of the scriptural proofs/evidence that God does in fact withhold mercy.  He has every right to do so as it is undeserved to begin with. Stomping your feet saying "I don't like that!" and "That's gross!" doesn't do anything to advance your argument.  It's the very Bible that is saying these things.  It's not as if I wandered over to this board and wrote a bunch of fictional bible passages.  I copied those verses right out of the Bible itself.  It's the Bible you find "Gross".

No my analogy doesn't fail.  We are not talking about deserving anything.  We never were, at least I wasn't.  We are talking about mercy.  Something the god of Calvin simply doesn't display.

And not it is not the Bible I find gross, it is your interpretation that I find gross - each and every petal on your TULIP.
Logged
skala
Member
***

Manna: 4
Offline Offline

Mood:

Posts: 106

Blog entries (0)

View Profile
« Reply #119 on: September 25, 2009, 05:14:10 PM »

Jimmy, I didn't interpret those passages.  I simply pasted them.

Mat 11:21-24
(21)  "Woe to you, Chorazin! Woe to you, Bethsaida! For if the mighty works done in you had been done in Tyre and Sidon, they would have repented long ago in sackcloth and ashes.
(22)  But I tell you, it will be more bearable on the day of judgment for Tyre and Sidon than for you.
(23)  And you, Capernaum, will you be exalted to heaven? You will be brought down to Hades. For if the mighty works done in you had been done in Sodom, it would have remained until this day.
(24)  But I tell you that it will be more tolerable on the day of judgment for the land of Sodom than for you."

Your response: "Gross!!!"

Mat 11:25-27
(25)  At that time Jesus declared, "I thank you, Father, Lord of heaven and earth, that you have hidden these things from the wise and understanding and revealed them to little children;
(26)  yes, Father, for such was your gracious will.
(27)  All things have been handed over to me by my Father, and no one knows the Son except the Father, and no one knows the Father except the Son and anyone to whom the Son chooses to reveal him.

Your response: "Gross!!!"

Mat 13:10-14
(10)  Then the disciples came and said to him, "Why do you speak to them in parables?"
(11)  And he answered them, "To you it has been given to know the secrets of the kingdom of heaven, but to them it has not been given.
(12)  For to the one who has, more will be given, and he will have an abundance, but from the one who has not, even what he has will be taken away.
(13)  This is why I speak to them in parables, because seeing they do not see, and hearing they do not hear, nor do they understand.
(14) Indeed, in their case the prophecy of Isaiah is fulfilled that says: "'You will indeed hear but never understand, and you will indeed see but never perceive.

Your response: "Gross!!!"

Rom 9:17  For the scripture saith unto Pharaoh, Even for this same purpose have I raised thee up, that I might shew my power in thee, and that my name might be declared throughout all the earth.
Rom 9:18  Therefore hath he mercy on whom he will have mercy, and whom he will he hardeneth.

Your response: "Gross!!!"

Tsk tsk.

Next you said:
Quote
.Something the god of Calvin simply doesn't display.

We're not talking about what John Calvin believed.  It is irrelevant.  When have I ever referenced or copy/pasted any of his writings or commentaries? Never.  I've only been using the Bible.

It is becoming more and more clear that the God of the Bible is not the God you worship.  You keep finding Him disgusting and "gross".  You disapprove of His ways.  You gnash your teeth when He is on his throne making Sovereign decisions without consulting His creatures in the matter.  You demand justice and mercy from Him and call Him names when he doesn't give it.

Not a good place to be in, that's for sure.
Logged
Arminianism (part 1) - Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  



Login with username, password and session length

Grace-Centered Christian Forums
Bible concordance | abortion ticker | is God real? | galaga | play tetris | copter game | mini golf games | arcade | donkey kong | Christian marriage help | articles | privacy
Powered by SMF | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC