No, Im saying Jesus was not made of Mary's corrupt flesh. And how is it Catholics are not saying the same thing?
Jesus was not made of Mary’s corrupt flesh because she didn’t have corrupt flesh.
Well, Phil. 2:5-7 says 'in the likeness of men" . Rom. 8:3 says "in the likeness of sinful flesh". Like but somewhat different.
So what? How does that say that Jesus had a special body created just for him?
You ignore the point John 1:14. That is John 1:3. "All things are made by Him". The same word is used there to speak of all that God created.
I’m not ignoring the point. Make is not necessarily the same as created
Again, I believe the Scripture. It says from the woman's seed. And it speaks of man having seed.
Does it? Where?
I thought I did address them as they all speak to lineal descent. And I said at the begining that I'm not saying that Jesus is not connected to the lineage of Mary.
No, you didn’t address them. You tried to sidestep them with vague ‘lineal descent’ and ‘connected to the lineage’ without any explanation. as to what you meant by that.
And you never answered my question. Was the flesh of Adam celestial, or other worldly or what, when God made it?
I never said that Adam’s flesh was celestial or that Jesus’ flesh was celestial. Adam was made from the dust of the earth. Jesus was ‘made/caused to be/come into being
’ from Mary.
Here is a reminder of the scriptures you are ignoring:
3. Gal 3:16
"Now the promises were made to Abraham and to his offspring. It does not say, "And to offsprings," referring to many; but, referring to one, "And to your offspring," which is Christ."
If Christ was a brand new creation he could not have descended from Abraham.
4. Gen 22;18
“and by your descendants shall all the nations of the earth bless themselves, because you have obeyed my voice."
We are blessed through Christ. So he had to be a descendant of Abraham.
5. Rom 1:3
“…the gospel concerning his Son, who was descended from David according to the flesh”.
If Christ was a brand new creation he could not have descended from David according to the flesh
6. Rom 9:4-5
“They are Israelites, and to them belong the sonship, the glory, the covenants, the giving of the law, the worship, and the promises; to them belong the patriarchs, and of their race, according to the flesh, is the Christ.
Again, if Christ was a brand new creation he could not have been an Israelite according to the flesh
7. Gal 4:4
“But when the time had fully come, God sent forth his Son, born of woman, born under the law”
The Greek for ‘born’ here is gemenenon, Strong 1096:
“A prolonged and middle form of a primary verb; to cause to be
(“gen” -erate), that is, (reflexively) to become (come into being
The KJV translates it as made
Again this implies that Jesus body is generated (made) from Mary.
8. Lk 1:31
“And behold, you will conceive in your womb and bear a son, and you shall call his name Jesus”
By any normal interpretation conceive
means to become pregnant with material from the mother.
9. Lk 1:32
“He will be great, and will be called the Son of the Most High; and the Lord God will give to him the throne of his father David”.
If Christ was a brand new creation he could not have descended from David and therefore David could not be called his father and he would have no legitimate claim to the throne of David. God’s promise to David (2Sam 7:16) would have been broken:
“And your house and your kingdom shall be made sure for ever before me; your throne shall be established for ever.”