GCM Home | Bible Search | Rules | Donate | Bookstore | RSS | Facebook | Twitter

Author Topic: Questions about BEING PRUDE  (Read 3480 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline BAH-BLAH

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1621
  • Manna: 44
    • View Profile
Re: Questions about BEING PRUDE
« Reply #15 on: January 21, 2010, 06:59:32 AM »
Ive skimmed, will read better, but let me ask this


Why have I seen no one engage his claims scripturally, and only one person engage him vaguely Biblically?

Rather its just Jon Stewartisms coming after him, or specious questions of his motive.

For the benefit of someone who may be impressionable, it may be good to come back with some real refutations here folks

Christian Forums and Message Board

Re: Questions about BEING PRUDE
« Reply #15 on: January 21, 2010, 06:59:32 AM »

Offline chosenone

  • Global Moderator
  • King James Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23024
  • Manna: 474
  • Gender: Female
    • View Profile
Re: Questions about BEING PRUDE
« Reply #16 on: January 21, 2010, 08:20:30 AM »
Bahblah dont we all know that the Bible says not to comitt adultery or lust after other women? If he wants the verses for that then I am happy to write them here.

Christian Forums and Message Board

Re: Questions about BEING PRUDE
« Reply #16 on: January 21, 2010, 08:20:30 AM »

Offline Mac

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1088
  • Manna: 50
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: Questions about BEING PRUDE
« Reply #17 on: January 21, 2010, 08:31:12 AM »
And there is nothing wrong with a man having several women.   So Tiger Woods did nothing wrong.  

Umm, it is called fornication... I believe that is in the bible.. Last time I looked...

Oh, and I think that God thought so little about it, that He said fornicators would not inherit the Kingdom...

9Or do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived; neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor homosexuals,  10nor thieves, nor the covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers, will inherit the kingdom of God.

Test yourself... 2 Cor 13:5
5Test yourselves to see if you are in the faith; examine yourselves! Or do you not recognize this about yourselves, that Jesus Christ is in you--unless indeed you fail the test?

Question you should ask yourself, What would Jesus do? Wouldn't Jesus have slept with women if it was ok for "men to have many women"? Or at least tell us it was ok? What about the apostles?

On the contrary, the Word calls it fornicating.. You have allowed yourself to be deceived ...  

Christian Forums and Message Board

Re: Questions about BEING PRUDE
« Reply #17 on: January 21, 2010, 08:31:12 AM »

Offline Mere Nick

  • Lee's Inner Circle Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 12399
  • Manna: 300
  • Gender: Male
  • Reckon you could make me some biscuits?
    • View Profile
Re: Questions about BEING PRUDE
« Reply #18 on: January 21, 2010, 08:47:14 AM »
Ive skimmed, will read better, but let me ask this


Why have I seen no one engage his claims scripturally, and only one person engage him vaguely Biblically?

Rather its just Jon Stewartisms coming after him, or specious questions of his motive.

For the benefit of someone who may be impressionable, it may be good to come back with some real refutations here folks

From what I've seen, Memphis Dwight is a one trick pony and folks have already gone round and round with him about it many times before.  If you lived in Mayberry, how long would it take you to realize you can't have an intelligent conversation with Ernest T. Bass?

Christian Forums and Message Board

Re: Questions about BEING PRUDE
« Reply #18 on: January 21, 2010, 08:47:14 AM »

Offline BAH-BLAH

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1621
  • Manna: 44
    • View Profile
Re: Questions about BEING PRUDE
« Reply #19 on: January 21, 2010, 08:55:15 AM »
Ive skimmed, will read better, but let me ask this


Why have I seen no one engage his claims scripturally, and only one person engage him vaguely Biblically?

Rather its just Jon Stewartisms coming after him, or specious questions of his motive.

For the benefit of someone who may be impressionable, it may be good to come back with some real refutations here folks

From what I've seen, Memphis Dwight is a one trick pony and folks have already gone round and round with him about it many times before.  If you lived in Mayberry, how long would it take you to realize you can't have an intelligent conversation with Ernest T. Bass?

Fair enough.....I lacked historical perspective

Christian Forums and Message Board

Re: Questions about BEING PRUDE
« Reply #19 on: January 21, 2010, 08:55:15 AM »



Offline Hot Ice

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 452
  • Manna: 16
    • View Profile
Re: Questions about BEING PRUDE
« Reply #20 on: January 22, 2010, 07:06:51 PM »
The question is this:  If you are wrong on some of this, are you willing to unlearn your error?  

Christ had some strong pronouncements regarding adding to or taking away from true doctrine.  That should make anyone claiming to be a christian take notice and beware of what they teach.  

First thing to know is that there are no new sexual ethics introduced into the new testament.  All morality in the new testament has its basis in the old testament.  

Another fact to keep in mind is that the "rules" regarding sexual behavior didn't originate within the false premise that sexual activity is inherently evil and can only be made acceptable within a Roman Catholic sanctioned marriage.  The truth of the matter is that there are other not-so-surprising reasons that the particular relations are regulated.  For example, if a girl is betrothed, she belongs to the man to whom she is betrothed.   If another man were to come along and sleep with her, then the transgression has its origin not in the false premise that sex is evil but rather that his rights to her were being violated.  

When God gave directives in the book of Leviticus regarding men lying with men, there was no corresponding condemnation of women lying with women.  In fact, there is no clear teaching ng against what we might call lesbianism in the whole bible.  

Here is a good article explaining what is meant in Romans 1:26-27.  It clearly shows that the women had stopped having procreative vaginal sex and instead engaged in anal sex.  

We always think SHAME ON YOU man if you like looking at women in skimpy clothing.  But guess what?  That is how man is made.   It is natural to like the shape of a woman.  Wide hips, ample breasts and color in the cheeks and lips means she is healthy and fertile.  And God has given the command to be fruitful and multiply and there is nothing wrong with that.  

And there is nothing wrong with a man having several women.   So Tiger Woods did nothing wrong.  
Romans 1:27 says that the women being talked about were "burning in their lust one toward another"  Two women are incapable of having anal sex with their bodies, and there was only the mention of the wrong use of their bodies.

Further more, look at verse 29:  It tells about that same group mentioned in 26-28 as being filled with unrighteousnes, wickedness, fornication, coveteousness,  and more.  And there was no mention of man being held accountable, while women are free to just do as they wish.  No mention of man being allowed to just go ahead and sleep with who he wants, despite the VOWS made before a HOLY GOD.  In fact, the Word makes it clear that God is without partiality, that He is no respecter of persons.

How can a woman "marry" another woman (let alone, just have sex with her) and, at the same time, obey what God says about fornication?  How can she have sex with another woman, "in the name of the Lord Jesus, giving thanks to God and the Father by Him" (Colossians 3:23)?

Nothing wrong with "having" several women?  Do you really HAVE them, if you're only USING  them?  When Romans 5:33 commands each man to love his own wife as his own flesh, why was there no mention of other wives?  Why did God not command each man to leave his father and mother and cleave to his wives?  Why did He just mention that the TWO shall become one flesh?

Hebrews 13: 4--Marriage [is] honourable in all, and the bed undefiled: but whoremongers and adulterers God will judge.

Leviticus 18:20--Moreover thou shalt not lie carnally with thy neighbour's wife, to defile thyself with her.

Christian Forums and Message Board

Re: Questions about BEING PRUDE
« Reply #20 on: January 22, 2010, 07:06:51 PM »

Offline chosenone

  • Global Moderator
  • King James Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23024
  • Manna: 474
  • Gender: Female
    • View Profile
Re: Questions about BEING PRUDE
« Reply #21 on: January 22, 2010, 08:44:18 PM »
Good post hotice. Anyone who thinks that God is OK with the things that MD advocates hasnt read the Bible properly. Two women having sex is just as bad as two men. A man having sex with a women who isnt his wife is adultery or fornication. Gods intention was always for a man and a women to marry and to be faithful to each other. He has never changed that.

Also MD why is it SOOO important for you to believe that is it
a) OK for two women to have sex?
and
b) to think that it is OK for a man to have sex with loads of women like Tiger Woods did.? 
and
c) Ok for men to look at other women who are not wearing much.???????

The godly thing for you to do is to look after and cherish and be faithul to the wife of your youth as the Bible tells us. Let HER satisfy you at ALL  times.

Offline lightshineon

  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5182
  • Manna: 125
  • Gender: Female
    • View Profile
Re: Questions about BEING PRUDE
« Reply #22 on: January 22, 2010, 10:45:51 PM »
 Where do these types come from ::help::