GCM Home | Bible Search | Rules | Donate | Bookstore | RSS | Facebook | Twitter

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 10
41
We are living in "the days of noah."

It is not about equality, it is about being sexual...liberals love sexual immorality...it is the perfect way to break down a society.

It is a sad state of affairs, indeed...but we know how things turn out in the end, amen?   ::clappingoverhead::

I watched a replay of a speaker at a recent lesbian conference, not more than two weeks ago.  She told the truth.  She said that homosexuals really did not care about marriage and don't want to be married.  She said that their ultimate goal is to destroy the institution of marriage.  I guess they envision people like a pack of dogs running together and doing you-know-what whenever the time is right. 

I didn't know about this bare-breasted march in New York, but I know that they did the same thing not long ago in San Francisco and nothing was done about it there either.  Of course, San Francisco is the country's capital of liberal social mores (I hope that doesn't offend anyone but it is true), but I didn't think they would stoop this low in New York. 
42
Theology Forum / Re: Salvation by works?
« Last post by Lively Stone on Today at 02:17:47 PM »
If I could humble myself that Lively could teach me or if she could humble herself to be open to the possibility that I might teach her something, then yes. Have we seen much of that kind of himility? No we are divided up on our idealogical amen or manna teams with our ears and hearts closed.

I have no lack of confidence in God's word, only in our ability to oroperly interpret it, with so many of man's traditions and teachings muddying up the water.

Just because I have no doubt about what the Lord says doesn't mean my heart and ears are closed. I have been walking with Jesus for 50 years, and have had a lot of time to put what He teaches to the test.

I also have NO DOUBT about what the Lord says and have been walking with Christ 48 years and have had a lot of time also to put what he has said to the test. when we have no doubt it is not impossible to get through, but it is didficult and we tend to sluff off what others have to say. I know you and I do this and I'm sure other confident ones are that way also. This is why division is perpetuated in the Body of Christ, and Jesus said we should be one in the Spirit. We are not as Christians.

I don't slough off what people say. I take it in, think about it, and in light of scriptural truth, I can either accept it as truth or reject it as false. Holy Spirit in me shows me what to do. He would not let me rest if it was false.

He is trustworthy. We aren't left here by God to make such determinations all on our own. The trouble is, people give way to others to show them what truth is. As Bereans, we must search the word and allow God to reveal to us what is true. It isn't hard once you become familiar with His voice.
43
'Gay Paree' takes on new meaning.

http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/french-president-signs-gay-marriage-law-19208829#.UZfhOZx2NhE
By ANGELA CHARLTON Associated Press
PARIS May 18, 2013 (AP)

France will see its first gay weddings within days, after French President Francois Hollande signed a law Saturday authorizing marriage and adoption by same-sex couples and ending months of nationwide protests and wrenching debate.

Hollande's office said he signed the bill Saturday morning, a day after the Constitutional Council struck down a challenge to the law and ruled it in line with France's constitution.

Hollande, a Socialist, had made legalizing gay marriage one of his campaign pledges last year. While polls for years have shown majority support for gay marriage in France, adoption by same-sex couples is more controversial.
44
Blue, you seem to have a talent for putting words in people's mouths.  I didn't say any of the things you accuse me of.

Just one question. If a woman going shirtless is immoral as you say, where is your scriptural support? Do you have a 'thou shalt not show thy nipples' tucked up your sleeve?

are you serious? You need the word of God to tell you not to go topless. It is common sense. I guess the Bible proof would be rev where it talks about those being naked before God because they have no robe and there shame.

If you can't see anything wrong with a woman going topless, then answer my questions do you let your kids if under 18 or grand kids look at pictures of topless women?

The true is the bible doesn't need to tell a woman not to show her breast if she doesn't know that simple thing, she is not much of a woman at all.
45
I'm referring to Catholics and Church of Christ members or any other group that doesn't know their saved.

This is an interesting question... never heard it before...  but I don't quite follow you.  they are members of these churches and do not know if they are saved or not... 

Let me ask if you will...  what prompted you to ask this question...

There are plenty of people in various denominations who think it is presumptuous for a person to claim that he possesses eternal life. They think God will make that determination after their physical death, and it is not our place to prejudge the matter.

Will those people make it to heaven or not? Answer: God knows those who are His. It's best if we stay out of the business of deciding whose beliefs entitle them to heaven and whose beliefs exclude them from heaven. It is safe to generalize salvation in this way, however: Whoever calls on the name of the Lord shall be saved.
46
This is from the Book of Acts commentary, by Gareth L. Reese, which was used at the Bible college I attended.

This is under the heading of Special Study #4 which deals with "Speaking In Tongues."  This is not written to be complimentary but is written as a piece which condemns those who speak in tongues.  I'm going to give you an excerpt from page 102 and will skip over to page 105 where Reese names names and organizations and is critical about those who "speak in tongues."

The Roots of Pentecostalism can be traced back to John Wesley and his beginnings of Methodism in the 1780's.  Wesley placed great emphasis on an experience that every Christian should have after conversion.  He called it "perfect love," and meant by that term what is called sanctification or a second work of grace.  Charles G. Finney  (1792-1876), a famous revival preacher, took Wesley's idea and modified it a bit.  He was the first to say that the "experience after conversion" is the same as "the baptism of the Holy Spirit" that one can read about in the Bible.  About the same time of the Civil War, Methodism's emphasis on perfect love had fallen into decline, and a reaction to the Holiness Movement was born in an effort to reiterate the emphasis on the forgotten second experience.  However, the Holiness people had difficulty in deciding on a criteria by which to judge if a person was "holy" or not.  This is where the peculiar emphasis of the Pentecostals comes in.  Pentecostals, once the movement was born, began to teach that "speaking in tongues" is evidence that a man has been baptized of the Holy Spirit (experienced the sanctifying work of the Holy Spirit after conversion. 

On page 105 Reese lets us know who we should avoid as false teachers.  They are:

The Full Gospel Business Men's Fellowship
Women's Aglow Fellowship
Melody Land Christian Center
John Sherrill
Harold Bredesen
David Wilkerson
George Otis
Kathryn Kuhlman
Dennis Bennett
Demos Shakarian
Jamie Buckingham
David J. DePlessis
J. Rodman Williams
Logos Publishers
Whittaker House
Living Waters Publications

Throughout the commentary Reese names contemporary people whom he views as false teachers.  If you are willing to take an honest look at this commentary then you must conclude that too much of the book is dedicated to condemning others and not enough time spent on the Bible. 

If you read a commentary by a legitimate theologian, like Mounce or Geisler, you won't see rubbish like this.
47
Theology Forum / Re: God Doesn't Care About Your Sins
« Last post by Lively Stone on Today at 02:10:42 PM »
God cares about man breaking His Law , Commandments
and He calls this transgression SIN.
When we break human laws we call it 'crime.
Both these actions violate certain rules and regulations !
Does it matter ???

The Commandments are written on our hearts. In this part of God's economy, we are blessed to be in intimate relationship with the Father through the Son, and once forgiven of all our sin, as we walk with Him, we are continually cleansed and forgiven as we go. Jesus'  blood flows constantly like a river. We are no longer considered sinners, but righteous. God doesn't hold anything against us, but calls us His own and desires to shower us with His love and favour. We forfeit that when we succumb to the false thinking that we must live according to rules and regulations and that one slip-up renders us far from God.

You miss this intimacy when you promote your legalism. The only way to break out of that bondage is to take some time with God and ask Holy Spirit to come and baptize you with Himself. He will then give you a revelation of who you are in Christ and break those chains of rules and regulations that are impossible to live up to.
48
Blue, you seem to have a talent for putting words in people's mouths.  I didn't say any of the things you accuse me of.

Just one question. If a woman going shirtless is immoral as you say, where is your scriptural support? Do you have a 'thou shalt not show thy nipples' tucked up your sleeve?
49
Theology Forum / Re: Are the Olympics pagan?
« Last post by Firewing on Today at 02:04:19 PM »
Maybe at first, but over time they've evolved and changed and now anyone can participate in them, regardless of their religion background, and even some thank God for their special abilities or to even be allowed to do what they love to do.

Also, if one was to not watch the Olympics because they had origins in a pagan culture, and try to not participate it in anything with a pagan origin, then it would be extremely difficult to operate in the world today.

The names of the week? All pagan in origin (Sunday for Sun worship, Monday or Moon worship, Thursday is Thors-Day, Saturday is Saturn's Day)...same with the names of the Months - all pagan in origin.
How about something as simple as cereal? Nope..also pagan from Ceres.

Just because we use the term 'Monday'...does not mean that we automatically are worshiping the moon...or if we eat cereal that we are honoring some pagan god.
50
Theology Forum / Re: Salvation by works?
« Last post by Jaime on Today at 01:59:23 PM »
If I could humble myself that Lively could teach me or if she could humble herself to be open to the possibility that I might teach her something, then yes. Have we seen much of that kind of himility? No we are divided up on our idealogical amen or manna teams with our ears and hearts closed.

I have no lack of confidence in God's word, only in our ability to oroperly interpret it, with so many of man's traditions and teachings muddying up the water.

Just because I have no doubt about what the Lord says doesn't mean my heart and ears are closed. I have been walking with Jesus for 50 years, and have had a lot of time to put what He teaches to the test.

I also have NO DOUBT about what the Lord says and have been walking with Christ 48 years and have had a lot of time also to put what he has said to the test. when we have no doubt it is not impossible to get through, but it is didficult and we tend to sluff off what others have to say. I know you and I do this and I'm sure other confident ones are that way also. This is why division is perpetuated in the Body of Christ, and Jesus said we should be one in the Spirit. We are not as Christians.
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 10