Author Topic: @TheBarbarian . As I recall it was you, a year or so ago, who .........  (Read 85 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Rella

  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 9642
  • Manna: 663
  • Now it is 12... but they are wrong ~ Amo makes 13.
went into great explanations to say there was no way that Covid could have been "made" in a Wuhan lab.

I just wonder what you think with the news and talk being all about what you said was not....

 DR. LI-MENG YAN: From my first report, I can present solid scientific evidence that Covid 19 actually is not from nature…I work with the top virologists in the world so together with my experience, I can tell you this is created in the lab. This is from…owned by the Chinese military and also, it is spread to the world to make such damage.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2021/05/23/tucker_carlson_coronavirus_was_enhanced_during_reckless_ghoulish_very_dangerous_experiments.html#!

Scott Gottlieb, the former head of the Food and Drug Administration said in a Sunday interview on CBS' "Face the Nation" that the case for COVID-19 originating in a lab has become increasingly likely while the possibility that the virus came from an animal is dwindling.

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/landonmion/2021/05/30/former-fda-head-says-covid-likely-originated-from-wuhan-lab-n2590233


Chinese virologist who was among first to tout Wuhan lab theory says Fauci's emails back up what she's been saying all along - the coronavirus is 'an unrestricted bioweapon' - and blasts Fauci and medical experts for cover-up

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9648687/Chinese-virologist-says-Fauci-emails-claim-coronavirus-unrestricted-bioweapon.html

Or possibly Gain-Of-Function

At issue is whether the National Institutes of Health funded research on bat coronaviruses that could have caused a pathogen to become more infectious to humans and, separately, if SARS-CoV-2 — the virus that causes the disease COVID-19 — transferred naturally from bats to humans, possibly through an intermediate host animal, or if a virus, a naturally occurring one or a lab-enhanced one, was accidentally released from the Wuhan lab.

https://www.factcheck.org/2021/05/the-wuhan-lab-and-the-gain-of-function-disagreement/

As evidence, Wade notes that while researchers have identified a very similar RaTG13 virus in horseshoe bats, they have not so far found a likely progenitor of the COVID-19 coronavirus in any wild or domesticated species.

Wade argues that circumstantial evidence strongly supports the idea that the virus escaped from the Wuhan Institute of Virology. First, the lab has been collecting and doing research on bat coronaviruses for years and, perhaps not so coincidentally, the outbreak begin in Wuhan and nowhere else. Second, he claims that the initial uniformity of the strain of virus at the outset of the pandemic suggests that it was a gain-of-function variant experimentally adapted to be especially good at infecting human cells. Gain-of-function research seeks to improve the ability of a pathogen to cause disease. Wade also puts great evidentiary weight on the fact that the virus supposedly has an unusual furin cleavage site (a specific protein that the virus uses to enter human cells). Wade believes that its presence in the COVID-19 virus suggests lab manipulation.

https://reason.com/2021/05/12/did-covid-19-leak-from-a-wuhan-lab/

As it happens, virologists at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China were doing exactly these kinds of experiments. The program was headed by Dr. Zheng-li Shi, known as Bat Lady in China because of her intense interest in bat viruses. Dr. Shi had gathered many coronaviruses, the type to which SARS2 belongs, from caves in Yunnan in southern China. Her research focused on the spike proteins which stud the surface of the virus and latch on to its target cells.

The exact nature of the spike proteins determines which kind of animal species the virus can infect. Shi was taking spike protein genes from different viruses, inserting them into a series of virus backbones, and trying to find the combination that would best attack humans.

“It is clear that the Wuhan Institute of Virology was systematically constructing novel chimeric coronaviruses and was assessing their ability to infect human cells and human-ACE2-expressing mice,” says Richard H. Ebright, a molecular biologist at Rutgers University and leading expert on biosafety.

How do we know for sure that this is what Shi was doing? Because, by a strange twist in the story, she was funded by grants from the National Institutes of Health — channeled through Daszak. And these grant proposals, a matter of public record, spell out exactly what experiments she planned to do.

https://nypost.com/2021/05/09/theory-that-covid-escaped-from-a-lab-may-not-be-far-fetched/

« Last Edit: Mon Jun 07, 2021 - 20:45:32 by Rella »

 

     
anything