Seve said...
The Physical Making of the 1st Firmament of Heaven on the 2nd Day.
The firmament of heaven Made (Gen 1:6-8) was like a glass container (simile) in which God would build above the firmament. The firmament protected Adam's Earth from the water which completely surrounded this firmament. The verses below reveal this since God places water inside the firmament of heaven above....
Gen 1:6-8 And God said, Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters. 7 And God made the firmament, and divided the waters which [were] under the firmament from the waters which [were] above the firmament: and it was so. 8 And God called the firmament Heaven. And the evening and the morning were the second day.
You do understand what firmament means, right? It means the sky...and God placed it to separate the waters that would become part of the earth from the waters in the atmosphere that what's left is the ozone layer (the thin layer of water molecules that surrounds the earth and protects it from the full bombardment of the sun's radiation rays). The firmament did not "protect" Adam's earth from the water above the expanse, the water above the expanse was protecting the earth...
Perhaps, the Bible Dictionary by Easton below - should help you understand better and correct the error of your religious assumption. Let me know if still don’t get it. http://www.biblestudytools.com/dictionaries/eastons-bible-dictionary/firmament.html
Dictionaries - Easton's Bible Dictionary - Firmament
Firmament [N]
from the Vulgate firmamentum, which is used as the translation of the Hebrew raki'a . This word means simply "expansion." It denotes the space or expanse like an arch appearing immediately above us. They who rendered raki'a by firmamentum regarded it as a solid body. The language of Scripture is not scientific but popular, and hence we read of the sun rising and setting, and also here the use of this particular word. It is plain that it was used to denote solidity as well as expansion. It formed a division between the waters above and the waters below ( Genesis 1:7 ). The raki'a supported the upper reservoir ( Psalms 148:4 ). It was the support also of the heavenly bodies ( Genesis 1:14 ), and is spoken of as having "windows" and "doors" ( Genesis 7:11 ; Isaiah 24:18 ; Malachi 3:10 ) through which the rain and snow might descend.
Here's another similar image below for your visualization - just to give you an idea what I am talking about - it's not exactly the way I see it but close.
So, just so I understand where you are coming from, which parts of this picture are not according to your view?
I an not sure why the quotes are being cross out but you can read them anyway - It must be contrary to the forum's or your religious view, is it? 
Perhaps the forum, but I don't own it, otherwise things would be done very differently here...
Do a study on the lifespan of human beings before and then after the flood (the floodgates of heaven was opened), because most of the water that was above the expanse was allowed to fall to the earth and help to flood it, leaving only the thin layer that remains today. The radiation that comes through that thin layer today is part of the reason why the human lifespan was greatly reduced after the flood...from 900 years to 100.
WRONG AGAIN. It has nothing to do with your seemingly, extreme left wing Environmental point of view of our present world.
The Lord was totally disgusted to see the daughters of men forming a union of marriage with the prehistoric beings or sons of God. Gen 6:3 since the Lord knows that those combinations would produce men of brutish beast - mighty men of old. Therefore, he cuts mankind's lifespan to 90%.
Yah....rrrrrrrrriiiiiiight...you are really way out in left field here. You are not as Scripturally astute as you might think you are, sir. Read the first chapters of Genesis again, as I suggested to you, and mark the age of men before and immediately after the flood. If you had any kind of creationist science background, you would know that the function of the ozone layer is, and matching that with the descriptors of the events in human history both before and after the flood, that it is based upon scientific measurements and findings regarding the entities involved. I have studied science as it has to do with creation for over 30 years now, and what I present is based upon that accumulation of scientific data from various reputable sources, the Institute for Creation Research, for starters.
Here, perhaps this will help you...
Genesis 11:11-25
11 And Shem lived after he fathered Arpachshad
500 years and had other sons and daughters. (that's over 500 years total lifespan)
12 When Arpachshad had lived
35 years, he fathered Shelah.
13 And Arpachshad lived after he fathered Shelah
403 years and had other sons and daughters. (that's 438 years total lifespan)
14 When Shelah had lived
30 years, he fathered Eber.
15 And Shelah lived after he fathered Eber
403 years and had other sons and daughters. (that's 433 years total lifespan)
16 When Eber had lived
34 years, he fathered Peleg.
17 And Eber lived after he fathered Peleg
430 years and had other sons and daughters. (that's 464 years total lifespan)
18 When Peleg had lived
30 years, he fathered Reu.
19 And Peleg lived after he fathered Reu
209 years and had other sons and daughters. (that's 239 years total lifespan)
20 When Reu had lived
32 years, he fathered Serug.
21 And Reu lived after he fathered Serug
207 years and had other sons and daughters. (that's 239 years total lifespan)
22 When Serug had lived
30 years, he fathered Nahor.
23 And Serug lived after he fathered Nahor
200 years and had other sons and daughters. (that's 230 years total lifespan)
24 When Nahor had lived
29 years, he fathered Terah.
25 And Nahor lived after he fathered Terah
119 years and had other sons and daughters. (that's 148 years total lifespan)
Humans went from living for almost 1 thousand years old to around 600 or so, then down to 500 and 400, and then down to 200 and 100 years old, within 8 generations after the flood. I am not an environmentalist, so stop making such ridiculous assumptions like that.
Second, God was not disgusted because women were having marrital relationships with "prehistoric beings"...the language is clear in the Hebrew that what you call prehistoric beings were demons, or fallen angels, whichever you prefer.
The more the Heathens get older, the more meaner he gets.
You don't sound that old...
Also, another correction: The entire world of Adam was totally destroyed in the flood therefore, there’s nothing left and has been clean dissolved already; no remnants; no more forever - gone. Read below for your better understanding.
[Isa 24:18-20 KJV] 18 And it shall come to pass, [that] he who fleeth from the noise of the fear shall fall into the pit; and he that cometh up out of the midst of the pit shall be taken in the snare: for the windows from on high are open, and the foundations of the earth do shake. 19 The earth is utterly broken down, the earth is clean dissolved, the earth is moved exceedingly. 20 The earth shall reel to and fro like a drunkard, and shall be removed like a cottage; and the transgression thereof shall be heavy upon it; and it shall fall, and not rise again.
Well, I hate to have to correct you again, young padowan, but Isaiah has nothing to do with the world before the flood. As for your spurious claim above that nothing of the old world survived...the anakim were in the world both before and after the flood, so your theology has some holes in it according to the Scriptures. Trees, animals, humans...all were here both before and after the flood.
He then built solid ground (similar to a man made island) on top of the water under the heaven. Can you visualize our Lord God building a solid ground into the middle of water? IF you can, then, that’s more or less how God divided the waters from the waters.
Where do you get this from? Not Scripture...If God only created a floating island, then He would have called it a floating island (He uses the term island in Scripture in other places, no reason for Him not to use it here if that is what He did). Then your second comment above...my answer is, "not really." If you read the context of the passage, God was dividing the waters from below the expanse (firmament) from the waters above it...He was not dividing the water on the earth through making dry land appear.
Once again: Your pre-conceived notion must have been blurring your reading comprehension.
I posted for other's better visualization and easy understanding explaining how God must have built the SOLID GROUND in the middle of the water to divide the water from the waters.
He didn't build solid ground, He called it into being out from the midst of the water, and no where does it even insinuate that it was floating upon the face of the water.
Solid ground does not float in the water, does it?.
Come on men, use your common sense and gifted mind and correct your premises which is only based on fallacious argument.
I am only one man, not many...and my argument is not fallacious...at least not anywhere near the one you are currently giving.
See? Now, we understand that Adam's firmament/heaven which was made the 2nd Day, Gen 1:8 and the mist that went up from Adam’s Earth on the 3rd Day forming the Earth’s Atmosphere..... the information below added to the account revealed in this verse:
Gen 2:4 These are the generations of the heavens (plural) and of the earth when they were created,in the day that the Lord God made the earth and the heavens,
Notice: As you know, the 1st Firmament called Heaven, was made on the 2nd Day. Gen 1:6-8. However, the immediate cited verse above (Gen.2:4) is speaking of other heavenS (plural) Made in the SAME day as Adam’s Earth. Gen 1:9. The ONLY Day the Earth and the other Heavens could have been made was the 3rd Day.
Wherever you are getting this from pins this whole story upon a single word (heavens) being plural...and that is not the way to do Biblical exegesis. The word heaven is plural because there are three realities of space and time that the Jews called heaven; 1. the atmosphere (air); 2. outer space (the darkness that surrounds the earth in the cosmos); and 3. God's dwelling place. Numbers 1 and 2 were created at the same time, number 3 is outside of time and space in the eternal realm where God dwells, so that one is outside the scope of your analysis.
I don’t follow Ancient Goat Herder Religious Traditional View of the Scripture. I am talking about the actual Making of the 1st Firmament of the Physical Heaven on the 2nd Day NOT the Outer Space or the Invisible Celestial Heaven above were God resides.
Therefore, your argument is out-of-context to topic of the topic presented to support my recorded stand.
Maybe you are that old...(
The more the Heathens get older, the more meaner he gets.
)...there's no "Ancient Goat Herder Religious Traditional View of the Scripture" here...and if that is what you call solid interpretation of the Scriptures according to Biblical principles of interpretation, then you have got some real problems with your personal, homespun theology...isn't that what you would call it?
Not really, and I would further to venture that you will not find very many people that will agree with what you have claimed so far...then I am curious, why quote Rev. 21:1 below, because it has no bearing upon anything that you have stated thus far?
As I have said, I don’t follow traditional view of others who can NOT support their doctrinal faith with Scripture.
I hate to tell you this Seve, but you can't support your personal home spun doctrinal stand with the Scriptures either...so you are in the same boat as those whom you claim not to be.
Good luck with that.
Just curious, do you believe that Jesus is Yahweh in the flesh? Or is that also one of those traditional views that you refuse to espouse?