Christian Forums and Message Board

There are other Daves here, so I had to look at this one to see if you were refering to me or someone else.

I am not a lawyer so if you could elaborate that would be helpful.

OK, gotcha.

I would have to say no to that question. At least for traditional Judaism.  Messianic Judaism is another story and without the long history, one that is not able to be told yet.

Going back to Moses, who was a Levite, a prophet and a judge; there were many times listed in the Pentetuch that some issue came up (the guy carrying sticks on the sabbath, the girls whose father died with no brother to inherit the family property, etc) where Moses had to go to God and pray to find out what to do. After him, the priests and judges had to do the same thing. 

When the pharasees rose up to fill in the gap left by an ineffectual priesthood they started doing the same thing. For the first few centuries that was just oral tradition or the "traditions of the fathers" as Paul calls it. Following the bar Kochba revolt of 135 ad, they decided to write it down and hence we got the Mishnah (200 ad) and Talmuds. (500 ad)  The process of rabbinic decrees continues to this day. Added to "work" prohibited on the sabbath: driving a car, flipping a light switch.

Again if I may,

(since you are the only Messianic Jew on the forum)

I have made several friends inside of the Messianic Jewish faith and all of them, including yourself refer back to the original Talmuds and practices of traditional Judaism for answers to a lot of issues concerning the various things in life that regularly fall outside of clear explanation of the Law and scripture.

Just wondering since you, yourself admit that they went beyond what was written if possibly some of the practices of falling back on traditional Judaism beliefs when there is no clear directive is somewhat flawed at times.

IT absolutely is flawed at times.  That is in large part what was argued against by Jesus that has been mistakenly attributed to the Mosaic scriptures themselves. He opposed many points where they went off-script.  But interestingly, on some points He seemed to agree and uphold extrabiblical ideas.

His sparing the life of the woman caught in adultery (Jn 8) is a good example.  "Let he who is without sin cast the first stone" is not found in scripture. It is however found in rabbinic literature that the person who throws the first stone has to be one of the original accusers and must be completely innocent of any complicity in the matter at hand.  (it was intended to make it very difficult to perform capital punishment)

Another example is the rabbinic heirarchy of OT commands. A negative (thou shalt not ...) command is always trumped by a positive one (thou shalt ...) with 2 excpetions: the prohibitions against idol worship and adultery.  HE used that one a few times in justifying healing on the sabbath, actually using it as taught by Hillel.