Repeating, I would say that shows a desire to not see anything different.
Of course you do. That fits your agenda. What is not being said (because most everyone else already understands this) is what I have told you. Focusing on systems is doomed to fail from the start. Every system is corruptible. Even yours. What we need to focus on is finding sound quality candidates and vote for them. If you want to get a million people together to do something get them to vote for good candidates. This is basic and should just be understood but I will explain this to you anyway, if you are not voting then no good candidate can be voted for. That is antithetical to the change you say you want. You are throwing out the baby with the bath water.
And your repeated accusation is, again, not honest. It is possible is shows something much different as I have just explained to you.
Agreed- "sound quality candidates". And by making a unified statement of not
supporting the unsound and unqualified, we can hopefully see the sound and quality emerge. Get those million (or more) together to vote for good, but do not
simply vote for that which is the least bad. As stated several times now, the unified action of not voting is not intended to go on forever. It is a statement, and there would be much more to the statement than simply not voting. It is saying, we, this group, united, will no longer support the flawed. We will go another way and if you want us back you have to come that way. We will no longer follow, but will now lead. And BTW, as Christians that is what we suppposed to do. Lead.