It is actually not his money log, it is yours, and mine, tax payer money spent on his hiding facts. how do you like them apples. Maybe that is what his Nobel Peace prize money is going towards. That or planned parenthood.

You know when the truth of Obama's birth comes out it will mean chaos in the U.S. All the laws, that he signs as President will become null and void, because he is not constitutionally qualified to be President. Which makes him illegitimate, as President, and the laws passed under him or like wise.

All the freedoms he is now trying to take from us will be returned in one shot if it is proven that he is not a natural born citizen, or worse. The suits by Phillip J. Berg are not to prove that he is not natural born, but that he is an illegal alien all together, if he proves his case, not only will Obama be removed from office, but he could be deported, or worse.

Logis, you'll see, or pretend to see, what you want. You blindly defend Obama no matter how obvious this whole thing is. He's hiding something. And I know that because...he's hiding something.

No, not the one we're talking about. There were others thrown out, with one judge even citing "FactCheck.org" as a source. But not Judge Carter, who is a federal judge. The case goes to trial January 5th.

There it is, you're right. It wasn't reported where I was looking. They have appealed and there are 5 other cases outstanding. I think it's interesting that it appears the issue is on who has jurisdiction to remove him. It's a chicken or the egg type thing. Obama's lawyers literally made the case that since he's already the President, that he can't be removed even if he wasn't eligible to be the President in the first place. The judge actually said to them that if he was not eligible then technically he really never was the President. But I guess even he has wimped out. That's a shame. Here's what the article that you linked to said:

U.S. District Court Judge David O. Carter dismissed the case Thursday and said in a written opinion that the U.S. Constitution does not give the court jurisdiction to decide the matter.

Carter says in court papers that the court cannot "sweep away the votes of over 68 million Americans with the stroke of a pen."

But again, if he wasn't eligible to run in the first place, then it wouldn't matter. It almost sounds like an admission of guilt...that Obama really isn't natural born but that the judge is saying it's not his place to remove Obama. It's really simple, if he didn't have anything to hide, he wouldn't be hiding. I think the Judge knows that and....has decided to pass the buck. What a shame. But the beat goes on. It has been appealed and there are other outstanding cases.

It's amazing that rather than simply legally force Obama to prove he's qualified by showing his birth certificate, legal semantic games are being played. It's so simple and his birth certificate would show it all...and for obvious reasons by now, Obama doesn't want his birth certificate to show the truth. Stunning!

Okay so you deny that the law defining natural born citizens allows non-military US citizens outside the US to give birth to natural born citizens. Then I ask you to quote the phrase from the law that says that such people must be in the military and you refuse. I ask you to tell me what the phrase "may be included in order to satisfy the physical-presence requirement " means and you just ignore it. I think I've asked these questions several times now. Why are you avoiding these simple questions? It seems like you're the one hiding. If you're going to make a claim, then support it.

I'm way more shocked by the fact that Lou Dobbs is married to a Mexican woman (being that he is so wildly anti-Mexican immigration).