When B. Hussein Obama spoke at Georgetown University earlier this year he asked for religious symbols to be covered or removed.  Georgetown resembles a Catholic University.  They don't act like Catholics, but they still have the old window dressing.

High above the podium where Obama was to speak was the monogram IHS a representation of Jesus' name.  Obama had it blacked out.




Before Obama, when Jesus' name wasn't offensive:

Then we should outlaw doctors!

Any argument in a storm, I guess.

This is something we can do something about, as every other free nation on Earth does.  To not do so is inexcusable.

 Marc, I guess my problems with Government healthcare, maybe different than some. The first is constitutional, if we were given gold to belong to this healthcare, and the majority of people do not want it, the it just is us being ruled by the government. Next, it was the way Obama wanted the bill on his desk to sign before the break in August, no one knew what was in the bill, no one had read it including Obama. He wanted to just have a power grab. I have a problem that he and congress, and unions have an elite private insurance, and will. I have a problem with Dr, shortages, and being told, what medicine I can take, and cannot depending on cost. I have a condition myself, and do not want to change medication's. Elder care, you know we will be old one day, and they seem not to value the elderly and their lives much. I am sure the poor will also be put on waiting list. In the Military the is a saying rank has its privileges. They have nothing in place, and do not seem ( both parties) to know how to find their butt with both hands, and that includes Obama. We are going to be taxed, so much as it is with cap and trade, health care, they want a national sales tax, all kinds of bull. You and I will be lucky if we bring home after all this 30% of what we make. My parents were PS teachers, and  I know you and I cannot afford such a thing. It is like king George rules again. I know you disagree, but, the poor will have to buy expensive insurance, or be fined, maybe jailed. I am willing to listen to your side, I do not always have to be right, infact, I hope I am wrong on this issue. BTW. I am very compassionate to the poor, I have given my last dollar in college more than once. I never turn anyone down that ask. So it is no a matter of selfishness on my part.

1. It's pretty much everybody except us.  To argue that Australia, GB, France, Germany, Canada, etc. aren't free is absurd.

2. There is no cause and effect between medical care and living/dying?  Really?

3. Do you think it's right that people die because they don't have as much money as other people?  Do you think it's right to be able to stop this, yet refuse to do so?

1. Living in a socialist country does not meet the American definition of freedom.   No I do not consider a nanny state where the majority of what you earn is confiscated for  "the common good" true freedom.  If you like it so well move there and be happy.

2. The cause and effect was between health insurance and death not medical care.  There are many ways to get medical care without medical insurance. 

3. I will answer you question with another question.  Do you believe it is right in a free nation to take what one person has earned and give it to someone else by force?  If one man chooses a job or works and earns enough money to afford good health insurance and another does not yes it is fair for the one able bodied man to do without rather than take by force of law what someone else has earned.  That is not freedom.   

I absolutely think that doing what we can do to save people's lives is right.  I don't give a whit for ideology; I believe right and wrong triumph politics.

Does anyone dare answer my third question directly?  

I can't control my gag reflex when a liberal says they're concerned with saving people's lives.  50 million dead in our own country and they think abortion laws are too restrictive.  How many million will it take to satisfy their blood lust?