Christian Forums and Message Board

While using "opposers" for the lack thereof of a better word, I just wanted to better underdstand why people don't like Obama so much? Now I'm a black guy from Indiana and all I ever hear when I ask other black people I know why they think other people oppose Obama they alsways try to make it out to be a race issue. I know racism still exists in the world but I don't think its the main underlying platform for "Obama-haters".

I don't really know too much when it comes to politics. "A soldier has the pleasure of looking his enemy in the eye", Maximus Decimus Meredius, Gladitor

But really I'm an independent by default so I'm really just asking.

While using "opposers" for the lack thereof of a better word, I just wanted to better underdstand why people don't like Obama so much?

He seems a likable guy and would probably be a better guy to go with fishing or to a ballgame than most politicians.  He seems a strong family man and I suspect that is due in part to his family situation growing up.

What do I not like about him?  In short, his policies are a disaster.  He comes across as a hyper-statist and, accordingly, most folks are economically hunkered down and not so concerned about building for the future right now but just trying to weather the storm.

I respect all Presidents and their demonstrated personal grit and intelligence to have gotten where they are . . .

One could say the exact same thing about cat burglars.

There is a new book out by D'Souza called "The Roots of Obama's Rage".  It presents a very scary picture of the man that is POTUS.  I am not sure that what is presented there is really what has so many people down on Obama, but certainly some of it is.

It is very interesting reading.  An interesting aspect of the book is that the author is Indian (India not Native American) and so perhaps sees Obama from a little different perspective that many of us.

One of the points that D'Souza makes, and perhaps what is frustrating even Obama's black supporters, is that Obama does not identify with the typical black in the racial overtones of America's past.  He has not endured the quiet racism of even today.  He has not experienced the effects of segregation of even his immediate family, since they did not experience that.  His mother was white, his father was black Kenyan.  The history of American segregation is foreign to him.  He, in a lot of ways, enjoyed a very sheltered upbringing so far as any racism is concerned.

One of the other points that D'Souza makes is that much of Obama comes from his own efforts to connect with his fathers ideology of anti-colonialism.  Much of that, D'Souza gleans from Obama's own book, "Dreams From My Father".  I have not read that book, but I plan to.

All of this goes to suggest that much of the opposition that has risen against Obama is because Obama isn't really the person that anyone, black or white, right or left, thought he was.

Personally, I think a lot of the animosity stems from the fact that Obama is fundamentally a secular socialist and is working very hard to turn America into a secular socialist nation and only about 20% of the population is in agreement with that effort.  That is, most people do not like the direction that they see Obama trying to move the country.  They simply do not like his policies.

It's not surprising that conservatives disagree with many of Obama's policies.  What is odd is how vehement and over-the-top the oppositions is.  He's trying to destroy the country! We've got to take our country back!  He's a socialist!  He's a communist!  He's a Luo tribesman!  He wants to impose the secular socialist machine!

The health care law is strikingly similar to Romneycare, to Dole/Baker/Daschle's proposal, and to Chafee's bill from 1993.  The individual mandate was originally a conservative proposal.  TARP and the auto bailouts happened under Bush.  Bush practiced stimulus spending during his term too.  Bush added more to the deficit than Washington to Reagan combined.  On the wars and the expansion of government power post-9/11, Obama is right in line with Bush. 

The facts suggest Obama is a conventional, relatively centrist, liberal who is married to the existing power structures of American politics and believes in making incremental progress (as he sees it) through political compromise. 

Many conservatives can rightly claim that they were opposed to many of Bush's policies too.  Many conservatives can rightly claim to not liking McCain either.  However, the opposition to Bush policies and dislike of McCain was not on the same level as the reaction to Obama.

How can we explain the intensity of opposition to Obama?  I think subconsciously it's easier to strongly dislike Obama because he is different.  I think economic suffering also amplifies discontent.

Ultimately, however, I think it is mainly just that Obama is on the other team.  The us vs. them postures that both sides adopt in their struggle for power obscures the reasonableness of we...that WE are actually all on the same team.  Many liberals have an irrational hatred of Bush.  Many conservatives have an irrational hatred of the Clintons (impeachment over Lewinsky, suspicions that the Clintons murder their enemies, etc.).  Obama's continuation of many Bush-era policies doesn't prompt the same response that they did under Bush.

I think a lot of folks hope he would one to tear down walls, but he appears to many as extremely divisive. His fault or not.

I also think a lot of his associations in the past have dismayed some folks.
It's politics, every opposition has claimed to want to "take back" the country for decades. It isn't at all because a black man is in the Whitehouse.

There is a new book out by D'Souza called "The Roots of Obama's Rage".  It presents a very scary picture of the man that is POTUS.  I am not sure that what is presented there is really what has so many people down on Obama, but certainly some of it is.

David Frum's take on the D'Souza's thesis, his cover story in Forbes, and Gingrich taking the ball and running with it: link.  Money quote:

Conservatives object to the Obama administration as too expensive, too regulatory, too intrusive, too beholden to Democratic special interest groups, and too apologetic about America’s role in the world. It’s a libel to claim that we object to the administration as too black or too alien. Bad enough when the libel is issued by liberals. Much worse when it is heard from our own writers, from magazines that speak to us, from political leaders who would speak for us.

From Andrew Ferguson's (senior editor at The Weekly Standard) review of D'Souza's book (link):

...Jack Kemp, a man not known for terseness: President Clinton, Kemp said, had brought to Washington something it had never seen before, the “first frankly left-wing administration in history.

Just so long as the Left doesn't take this election coming up seriously. Obama will be rescued to be a good President by a Republican House and hopefully a Republican Senate, just as Clinton was.

Or he could go the way of Carter with a Democrat Congress.

I think that Carter should thank Obama.  Obama is probably the only thing that will make Carter look good by comparison.