I find it rather interesting.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/11/17/ap-turns-heads-devoting-reporters-palin-book-fact-check/

Oh man the bad part of me hope she runs again just for the entertainment value. The good part of me hopes that a quality republican candidate runs.

I'm not sure how much I care about the AP putting a dozen reporters to fact check a controversial book. I guess it depends on how objective they are being.

But this article you posted is part of Fox's larger plan to promote Palin. I'm not sure why though. Why would Fox put their money behind Sara Palin at the expense of other much better Republicans?

I would much prefer a fact check on both House and Senate versions of Healthcare Reform.
What defines much better Republicans? Ones that look a lot like Democrats?

I would much prefer a fact check on both House and Senate versions of Healthcare Reform.

Do you seriously listen to Palin and think that you want her to represent you? There are conservative republicans who are reasonable and intelligent and have all sorts of experience with national and international issues. Sara Palin has catch phrases but otherwise no substance.

I have to agree with Logizmo here, I'm a paleo-conservative who thinks Palin is an intellectual junior flyweight with no real grasp of issues, who should not be allowed within a thousand miles of the GOP nomination in 2012.  If she's on the ballot, we lose again - badly.

You betcha.

Here is Obama:

http://www.thefoxnation.com/entertainment/2009/11/17/onion-video-obamas-teleprompter-malfunctions-during-family-dinner


There truly isnt a wits difference in depth between him and Palin.

She is indeed less able to weave jargon into her talks, and her impromptu responses to certain questions are not "sexed up" as good as Obama. But, I think he rattles platitudes in meetings as badly as he does in speeaches, and she MAY actually have more depth than her behind the mic persona portrays.

Im not inclined to be a Palin for Pres person at all. But I blanch when Obama is STILL credited as some intellectual giant. He isnt. Its lipstick on a pig.

His claim he made to Chinese students....what an absurd thing. he says whatever his audience wants at that moment.
It reminds me of Arnold in that Christmas movei where he plays Turboman. he is working on Christmas Eve and telling EVERY customer on the phone "remember you are my number one customer"

 gee Log, of course we do not want a Godly, intelligent, real person.  What? We want a woman like Nancy Pelosi, and super genius Obama, and Harry Reid, you know elitist socialist. I think maybe I will buy my kids a set of unholy evil Nancy, Obama, and Harry dolls for Christmas. Not really, would scare them. My goodness there are loony, and elitist. Log, I hate to tell you this, but, Obama does not like you. I am sorry no beer summits for you, I do not care if you reside in one of the fifty-seven states. ( just joking with you) we only have fifty states.

Rightness or wrongness in policies is different from the qualities of being reasonable and having leadership skill. Both are essentially matters of opinion. If you think Sarah Palin is the best the republican party has to offer in terms of leadership and is the most reasonable spokesperson for your views then support her.