Of course all... of that response is given in error, leaving out important Scripture, with a totally confused mindset.
2 And Jesus said unto them, 'See ye not all these things? verily I say unto you, There shall not be left here one stone upon another, that shall not be thrown down.'
3 And as He sat upon the mount of Olives, the disciples came unto Him privately, saying, 'Tell us, when shall these things be? and what shall be the sign of Thy coming, and of the end of the world?'
The 'subject' of Christ's Olivet discourse is that "... when shall these things be? and what shall be the sign of Thy coming, and of the end of the world?" Keeping to that idea throughout the whole Chapter is REQUIRED.
What Preterism tries to do instead is LEAVE that idea right off the bat with supplanting that Scripture with another idea foreign to the context of the Chapter. And their idea is that all this was fulfilled in 70 A.D., so much so, that the worst group of Preterist lies is the false idea that Jesus' 2nd coming already happened back in the days of His Apostles!
Crazy idea that is, because there is so much Bible Scripture of future events to occur with Christ's 2nd coming that have NEVER happened yet. And the main one is the literal, physical gathering of His Church to Him to reign with Him in Jerusalem! (Zechariah 14; 1 Thessalonians 4).
Let's see, does Jerusalem today recognize Jesus of Nazareth as Messiah? No, of course not, the orthodox Jews still reject Him!
It is so... easy to recognize Preterism is a lie, and a doctrine of devils. All one need do is keep to God's Word as written.
Yes, you are correct.
This is an excellent example of how the translators who placed the punctuations and the paragraphs and chapters in place
cause a lot to be read, as it was written but mis -understood as the context was broken up.
Let me give you an easy example of how we all can be led wrong.
A verse we all can quote by heart Luke 23:43 kjv
“And Jesus said unto him, Verily I say unto thee, To day shalt thou be with me in paradise.”
Through the centuries we have been taught and preach to that the thief went, on crucifixion day to be with Jesus in Paradise.
Had to be right... right? It is in the unerring KJV... and also the older ones as well.
But we know that could not be because Jesus had other things to do first before he could be in paradise with the thief.
NOW move a comma, that was NOT originally there.
“And Jesus said unto him, Verily I say unto thee To day,
shalt thou be with me in paradise.”
All meaning is changed to verifying Jesus' promise that the thief was told today... and would be ~ at some point~ with Jesus in paradise.