1) When a cold, hard fact is considered to be "patently lame" (with no proof offered to show that that was the case) then nothing can be shown.
2) If the claims of the critics were so true, then why do they have to lie so much about EGW?
3) If the claims of the critics are so true, then how come they don't explicitly disown any of the lies that are told about EGW?
I haven't talked about Ellen White, beyond saying that no one needs her as an authoritative source. The Bible, and the Bible alone is the only authoritative source for doctrine and theology.
I have asked you how you keep the Sabbath. You won't answer.
I have asked you how we are supposed to get saved, if we are not already. You won't answer.
I have asked how we are supposed to keep the Sabbath. You won't answer.
I've asked you to show me scripture that shows God instituted the Sabbath for mankind at creation, as you claim and you constantly repeat Genesis 2:2-3. That isn't a proof text.
I've asked you how you can keep the Sabbath when you do not have a sacrifice as Numbers 28 commands you to have. You won't answer.
I've asked you why you continue to claim that God insituted the Sabbath for mankind at creation when Deuteronomy 5 says He did not. You won't answer.
Any one of these questions should be simple for you to answer, if you had ample biblcal proof for your assertions and were confident of your position. Are you interested in defending Ellen White, or are you interested in sound doctrine?