I maintain that Adam's sin was not laid upon us. God holds no man guilty for the sins of another.
Briefly, well, sorta.....as much as possible.
1st Corinthians 15:21,22~"For since by man came death, by man came also the resurrection of the dead. For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive.
4WD, then you are going against such plain scriptures as this one before us.
You believe God deals with mankind as with a field of corn, where each stalk stands upon its own individual root; but scriptures teach otherwise~ He dealt with all men as with a tree, all the branches of which have one common root and trunk
. If you strike with an axe at the root of a tree, the whole tree falls—not only the trunk, but also the branches: all wither and die. So it was when Adam fell
. God permitted Satan to lay the axe at the root of the tree, and when Adam fell, all his posterity fell with him
. At one fatal stroke Adam was severed from communion with his Maker, and as the result “death passed upon all men.” Romans 5
Here, then, we learn what is the formal ground of man’s judicial condemnation before God. The popular idea of what renders man a sinner in the sight of heaven is altogether inadequate and false. The prevailing conception is that a sinner is one who commits and practices sin. It is true that this is the character of a sinner
, but it certainly is not
that which primarily constitutes him a sinner
. The truth is that every member of our race enters this world a guilty sinner before he ever commits a single transgression personally. It is not only that he possesses a sinful nature, but he is directly “under condemnation.” We are legally constituted sinners neither by what we are nor by what we are doing, but by the disobedience of our federal head, Adam. Adam acted not
for himself alone, but for all who were to spring from him.
On this point the teaching of the apostle Paul is plain and unambiguous. The terms of Romans 5:12-19, as we have shown before on this forum, not once, twice, but a few times over, are too varied and distinct to admit of any misconception: that it is on account of their sin in Adam
, men, in the first instance, are accounted guilty and treated as such, as well as partake of a depraved nature. The language of 1st Corinthians 15:22 quoted above is equally unintelligible except on the supposition that both Adam and Christ sustained a representative character, in virtue of which the one involved the race in guilt and ruin, and the other, by His obedience unto death, secured the justification and salvation of all
who were chosen in him~per Ephesians one. The actual condition of the human race, throughout its history, confirms the same: the apostle’s doctrine supplies the only adequate explanation of the universal prevalence of sin.
The human race is suffering now for the sin of Adam, or it is suffering for nothing at all.
This earth is the scene of a grim and awful tragedy. In it we see misery and wretchedness, pain and poverty, decay and death, on every side. None escape. That “man is born unto trouble as the sparks fly upward” is an indisputable fact. But what is the explanation of it? Every effect must have a previous cause. If we are not being punished for Adam’s sin, then, coming into this world, we are “children of wrath,” alienated from God, corrupt and depraved, and on the broad road which leadeth to destruction, for nothing at all!
But it will be said, It was unjust to make Adam our federal head. How so? Is not the principle of representation a fundamental one in human society? The father is the legal head of his children during their minority: what he does, binds the family. A business house is held responsible for the transactions of its agents. The heads of a state are vested with such authority that the treaties they make are binding upon the whole nation. This principle is so basic it cannot be set aside
. Every popular election illustrates the fact that a constituency will act through a representative and be bound by his acts. Human affairs could not continue, nor society exist without it. Why, then, be staggered at finding it inaugurated in Eden?
Consider the alternative. The race must have either stood in a full grown man living in a body of sin and death, with a full-orbed intellect or stood as babies, each entering his probation in the twilight of self-consciousness, each deciding his destiny before his eyes were half opened to what it all meant. How much better would that have been? How much more just? But could it not have been some other way? There was no other way
that could be more righteous than God's way of doing it. It was either the baby or it was the perfect, well equipped, al~calculating man~the man who saw and comprehended everything. That man was Adam” . Yes, Adam, fresh from the hands of his creator, with no sinful ancestry behind him, with no depraved nature within. A man-made in the image and likeness of God, pronounced by Him “very good,” in fellowship with heaven. Who could have been a more suitable representative for us? NO ONE!
This has been the principle on which and the method by which God has acted all through. The posterity of Canaan were cursed for the single transgression of their parent (Gen. 9). The Egyptians perished at the Red Sea as the result of Pharaoh’s wickedness. When Israel became God’s witness in the earth it was the same. The sins of the fathers were to be visited upon the children: in consequence of Achan’s one sin the whole of his family were stoned to death. The high priest acted on behalf of the whole nation. Later, the king was held accountable for the conduct of his subjects. One acting on behalf of others, the one responsible for the many, is a basic principle both of human and divine government. We cannot get away from it; wherever we look, it stares us in the face.
Finally, a very important consideration~let it be pointed out that the sinner’s salvation is made to depend upon the same principle
. Beware, 4WD, of quarreling with the justice of this law of representation. This principle wrecked us, and this principle alone can rescue us
. The disobedience of the first Adam was the judicial ground of our condemnation; the obedience of the last Adam is the legal ground on which God alone can justify the sinner. The substitution of Christ in the place of His people, the imputation of their sins to Him and of His righteousness to them, is the good news of the gospel. But the principle of being saved by what another has done is only possible on the ground that we are lost through what another did. The two stand or fall together
. If there had been no covenant of works there could have been no death in Adam, there could have been no life in Christ's life, death, and resurrection. Selah