I do not think divorce is absolutely prohibited, thats obvious. But chose, this line of thinking is what leads people who DO NOT have grounds to think its hunky dory to divorce...its really a bad rationale because its full on relativism. You could take this rationale for anything sinful and say "oh yea thats sin BUT so is this and this"....what does that actually SAY about each individual sin, in Gods eyes?    NOTHING! Its a 100% human idea to say yes thats bad but so is this , the implication being therefore the first thing isnt as bad as we were told it was. Each and every sin is judged on its own, in a vacuum, God isnt standing 2 people next to each other and comparing there sins to mitigate one. I say all this because I belive this manner of thinking, not only in divorce, but as Christians in general, is very bad, even dangerous for our own thinking and decisions. There is but ONE standard for each sin...GODS standard, and it has ZERO to do with the other. Its like the little boy who breaks a vase saying , "yea dad, but Jimmy down the street broke a WINDOW (therefore take it easy on me).

Fact is, most divorces have no Biblical grounds. The moment we begin to accept that is the moment the church can stop doubleminded treatment of it. There is no need to make divorce illegal or change laws in any way. BUT hearts need some work, and rationalizing and splitting hairs aint cuttin it. One cyysical) common rational (seen right here) is to IMMEDIATELY bring up abuse. Realize abuse (physical) is a ground in less than 5% of divorces. So informing our view on divorce using 5% is insane really.

Anyway, Im not sure whats up with the OP. But frankly I prefer that extreme over the one that exists now, which is to take as circuitous a path through the Bible as we need to find a way to justify, essentially, divorce for any reason, by calling anything and everything either abandonement or abuse. Best stay with first principles, and what gives with this urge Christians have to get as close to the line God has drawn on this as possible anyway? Why not err safe side? Its a mess.

Is that true Bah Blah that most divorces are not for abuse or adultery?. Of all the divorces in my family, my husbands family and my ex husbands family, they were nearly ALL for adultery.(and there have been many believe me)  With divorced people among friends, again they were nearly all for sexual immorality

.The only one that I can think of that wasnt, was my husbands divorce where his wife said he wasnt meeting her needs, but then she met another man and committed adultery anyway.