Welcome, Guest. Login or register to use the forums.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 11, 2010, 08:36:54 PM
Home Help Search Login Register
GCM Home | Bible Search | Rules | Bookstore | Support | Newsletter


+  Christian Forums
|-+  Christian Interests
| |-+  Theology Forum
| | |-+  How God Speaks?
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3 Go Down Print
Author Topic: How God Speaks?  (Read 1872 times)
apokalupsis
Member
***

Manna: 21
Offline Offline

Mood:

Gender: Male
Posts: 241


Following That Jesus Guy

Blog entries (0)

View Profile WWW
« Reply #15 on: July 15, 2007, 03:19:58 PM »


When Paul wrote those words in Ephesians, the Scriptures were not all written, and so the people did not have them all to fully teach them the will of God.  It was vital that those who had been appointed as apostles and prophets in that day go around and provide by inspiration what was not yet existent in Scripture, until it had been completed.

With the Scriptures complete, we can look to the writings and see the will of God and the ways of Christ when He was on the earth.  With the totality of Scripture we can be imitators of Christ without an apostle or a prophet. 

I think we misunderstand and misrepresent what a prophet is. 

Scripture says:  Keep the Sabbath holy.
A prophet would say:  Thus saith the Lord, if you keep breaking the Sabbath I'm going to withhold rain from you.

Jesus said:  You will be persecuted.
A prophet told Paul:  Your hands will be bound like this....

At other times, a prophet with forth-tell as well, or take the Word and apply it to our life which is exactly what we should do today.

We all prophecy in part.  There are times when God speaks to you, and applies the Word to your life, and times when the Holy Spirit warns you about something ahead, or gives a reassurance or promise about something.

Can there be a prophet who speaks the future as Isaiah did?  Well, that's simply not my job to decide who and when and why, it's God's. (I Corinthians 12:4ish)  But I would suggest a real prophet would apply the Scripture to today, occasionally have a promise or a warning about things to come, and most definitely would have to be a man or woman of great prayer and study.

Consider this passage: 2 Timothy 3:16-17.
All Scripture is inspired by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, for training in righteousness; so that the man of God may be adequate, equipped for every good work.

Paul stated that all Scripture is sufficient for the man of God to know all he needs to know so as to do all that God wants him to do.  If this is true, and I believe it is, then what will a so called prophet reveal now that is not already found in Scripture? 

When Paul said that, the Scriptures weren't put together yet as we now have them.  We should take his statement, and any Scripture written afterwards should be considered unnecessary?  Dispose of John & Revelation and others? (Revelation might disappear to some applause)

A prophet would reveal today what prophets revealed in Paul's day.  Application, promises and warnings all consistent with and based from Scripture.

The biggest reason prophets are less needed today is that we ALL have the gift of the Holy Spirit and we can ALL hear the direction and guidance of God, and ALL can have the Scriptures revealed to us and God's will revealed to us. 

The only reason God uses them today is perhaps because so few of us pray enough or he wouldn't have to go through someone else.

I'm as skeptical as you with most so-called prophets.  The term brings up bad connotations these days.  Nevertheless, God still speaks through people today, and God speaking through someone is prophecy.
Logged

Christian Forums
« Reply #15 on: July 15, 2007, 03:19:58 PM »

 
 Logged
angeleyes
Senior Member
****

Manna: 28
Offline Offline

Mood:

Gender: Female
Posts: 637


The steps of the righteous are ordered by God

Blog entries (0)

View Profile
« Reply #16 on: July 15, 2007, 03:37:20 PM »


When Paul wrote those words in Ephesians, the Scriptures were not all written, and so the people did not have them all to fully teach them the will of God.  It was vital that those who had been appointed as apostles and prophets in that day go around and provide by inspiration what was not yet existent in Scripture, until it had been completed.

With the Scriptures complete, we can look to the writings and see the will of God and the ways of Christ when He was on the earth.  With the totality of Scripture we can be imitators of Christ without an apostle or a prophet. 

I think we misunderstand and misrepresent what a prophet is. 

Scripture says:  Keep the Sabbath holy.
A prophet would say:  Thus saith the Lord, if you keep breaking the Sabbath I'm going to withhold rain from you.

Jesus said:  You will be persecuted.
A prophet told Paul:  Your hands will be bound like this....

At other times, a prophet with forth-tell as well, or take the Word and apply it to our life which is exactly what we should do today.

We all prophecy in part.  There are times when God speaks to you, and applies the Word to your life, and times when the Holy Spirit warns you about something ahead, or gives a reassurance or promise about something.

Can there be a prophet who speaks the future as Isaiah did?  Well, that's simply not my job to decide who and when and why, it's God's. (I Corinthians 12:4ish)  But I would suggest a real prophet would apply the Scripture to today, occasionally have a promise or a warning about things to come, and most definitely would have to be a man or woman of great prayer and study.

Consider this passage: 2 Timothy 3:16-17.
All Scripture is inspired by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, for training in righteousness; so that the man of God may be adequate, equipped for every good work.

Paul stated that all Scripture is sufficient for the man of God to know all he needs to know so as to do all that God wants him to do.  If this is true, and I believe it is, then what will a so called prophet reveal now that is not already found in Scripture? 

When Paul said that, the Scriptures weren't put together yet as we now have them.  We should take his statement, and any Scripture written afterwards should be considered unnecessary?  Dispose of John & Revelation and others? (Revelation might disappear to some applause)

A prophet would reveal today what prophets revealed in Paul's day.  Application, promises and warnings all consistent with and based from Scripture.

The biggest reason prophets are less needed today is that we ALL have the gift of the Holy Spirit and we can ALL hear the direction and guidance of God, and ALL can have the Scriptures revealed to us and God's will revealed to us. 

The only reason God uses them today is perhaps because so few of us pray enough or he wouldn't have to go through someone else.

I'm as skeptical as you with most so-called prophets.  The term brings up bad connotations these days.  Nevertheless, God still speaks through people today, and God speaking through someone is prophecy.


 Amen! God does still speak to day in many different ways, even through dreams and visions. Just thought I'd add that in there.
Logged

Psalms 91:7" A thousand shall fall at thy side, and ten thousand at thy right hand; but it shall not come nigh thee."

Ephesians 6:11-12 " Put on the whole armour of God, and that ye may be able to stand against the wiles of the devil. 12 For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.
Christian Forums
« Reply #16 on: July 15, 2007, 03:37:20 PM »

 Logged
blituri
Hero
*****

Manna: 169
Online Online

Mood:

Posts: 3381

Blog entries (0)

View Profile
« Reply #17 on: July 15, 2007, 03:46:15 PM »

Name it and claim it but don't expect Bible students and the history of such people who MADE the claim and ugly things happened to them. Remember Montanus who first hired a "treasurer" and seduced two women to 'prophesy' through him.  Well, both prophetesses caught on and killed themselves at the same time in different cities.

You are claiming what is NOT claimed and proven and you cannot prove any prophecy or revelation today.

Just don't expect us to drink no KoolAid you cook up.

No manna, you are trying to collect it on the Sabbath which means REST and NOT Worship.
Why is it that I know that from the Bible and you probably PAID someone to be your mediator in song and sermon
and got your anxieties all ruffled so you just feel rotten in the morning and your kid's health care money has been fleeced right out of your holy raised hands.

Why didn't YOU figure that out? Or is the INSTITUTE now taking the money due only to the DESTITUTE because someone CLAIMED that God told them to fleee the widows and orphans?

Logged
angeleyes
Senior Member
****

Manna: 28
Offline Offline

Mood:

Gender: Female
Posts: 637


The steps of the righteous are ordered by God

Blog entries (0)

View Profile
« Reply #18 on: July 15, 2007, 03:56:17 PM »

Name it and claim it but don't expect Bible students and the history of such people who MADE the claim and ugly things happened to them. Remember Montanus who first hired a "treasurer" and seduced two women to 'prophesy' through him.  Well, both prophetesses caught on and killed themselves at the same time in different cities.

You are claiming what is NOT claimed and proven and you cannot prove any prophecy or revelation today.

Just don't expect us to drink no KoolAid you cook up.

No manna, you are trying to collect it on the Sabbath which means REST and NOT Worship.
Why is it that I know that from the Bible and you probably PAID someone to be your mediator in song and sermon
and got your anxieties all ruffled so you just feel rotten in the morning and your kid's health care money has been fleeced right out of your holy raised hands.

Why didn't YOU figure that out? Or is the INSTITUTE now taking the money due only to the DESTITUTE because someone CLAIMED that God told them to fleee the widows and orphans?



You know something, you think that you know it all and have a lot to type, but nothing meaningful to say. Wether you want to believe it or not is up to you, but who are you to judge and criticize those of us who do believe in prophets. Furthermore, you don't know anything about me and it is God I serve, live for and answer to, not you. I don't even have kids, what are you talking about. You are full of it.
Logged

Psalms 91:7" A thousand shall fall at thy side, and ten thousand at thy right hand; but it shall not come nigh thee."

Ephesians 6:11-12 " Put on the whole armour of God, and that ye may be able to stand against the wiles of the devil. 12 For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.
Less-of-Me
Guest
« Reply #19 on: July 15, 2007, 05:00:45 PM »

Name it and claim it but don't expect Bible students and the history of such people who MADE the claim and ugly things happened to them. Remember Montanus who first hired a "treasurer" and seduced two women to 'prophesy' through him.  Well, both prophetesses caught on and killed themselves at the same time in different cities.

You are claiming what is NOT claimed and proven and you cannot prove any prophecy or revelation today.

Just don't expect us to drink no KoolAid you cook up.

No manna, you are trying to collect it on the Sabbath which means REST and NOT Worship.
Why is it that I know that from the Bible and you probably PAID someone to be your mediator in song and sermon
and got your anxieties all ruffled so you just feel rotten in the morning and your kid's health care money has been fleeced right out of your holy raised hands.

Why didn't YOU figure that out? Or is the INSTITUTE now taking the money due only to the DESTITUTE because someone CLAIMED that God told them to fleee the widows and orphans?


I have no idea what you're talking about, but I'm going to assume you're reacting against what you perceive to be the "Name it and Claim it" philosophy.  I myself have only heard of this line of belief, and know nothing of it, so I cannot comment.

But allow me to ask you (and anyone else who wishes to answer) a genuine question or two:

Do we really serve a god who would speak to a few elite followerss and then lie silent and dormant for 2000+ plus years, perhaps silent until Christ will come again?  If we serve that kind of god..... why do we serve him?  What's the point?  If all we have to go on is the words of the Bible and nothing more, what makes our God any different from any other silent, dead, pre-frab god which man has fancied throughout the millenia?

Or do we believe our Bibles and understand that we serve a Living God, one of the Living Word, a breathing, passionate, purposeful God, a God who moves and stirs us uniquely to action?  Do we serve a God whose Spirit is not only alive within us but WORKING within us, impacting the world in a way that only a vibrant and alive Being can?

I can't speak for you, but I serve that Living God, that God who not only died for me but actively rose from the dead, as a tangible, literal sign that He is not dead, but ALIVE, that God who promised to send Another (the Spirit) soon after He ascended to take the place beside the Abba.

I can get excited about that God!  I can adore that God!  I can ache to joyfully serve that God!

So back to the original topic question, how does God speak?  Is it only through the dry and dusty words on a page.... or is there something else at work, SomeONE whose thoughts and ways are higher than our own?  If so.... does He really speak only through words written 2000+ years ago?  Or does He live within us, currently, urgently showing Himself alive through us in the here and the now?
Logged
ConnieLard
Guest
« Reply #20 on: July 15, 2007, 05:25:57 PM »

I wouldn't describe the Bible as "dry and dusty words on a page."  Having said that, I do believe the Spirit lives in each of us who are Christians.  Not sure how that works exactly, but I believe it because Jesus said it (I read it in those "dry and dusty words" on the pages of my Bible.

The problem with claiming to "hear" a special message from God directly is that none of us is ever free of our own desires and preferences.  It is hard to sort those out from what God is trying to speak to us sometimes. I am a little leery of people who start every sentence with "God told me" this or that.  Not that I question their sincerity, just their maturity and their ability to actually be certain that what they think they heard may not actually be just their own desires and preferences (unbeknownst to them).  Some of the most profoundly spiritual people throughout the years have admitted difficulty in this.  I think of Thomas Merton's famous prayer:

"My Lord God, I have no idea where I am going.
I do not see the road ahead of me.  I cannot know for certain
where it will end.  Nor do I really know myself, and the fact that
I think I am following Your will does not mean that I am
actually doing so.  But I believe that the desire to please You
does in fact please You.  And I hope I have that desire in all that
I am doing.  I hope that I will never do anything apart from that
desire.  And I know that, if I do this, You will lead me by the
right road, though I may know nothing about it.  Therefore, I
will trust You always though I may seem to be lost and in the
shadow of death.  I will not fear, for You are ever with me, and
You will never leave me to face my perils alone."
                                                           (Thoughts In Solitude)
Logged
Christian Forums
« Reply #20 on: July 15, 2007, 05:25:57 PM »

 Logged
Less-of-Me
Guest
« Reply #21 on: July 15, 2007, 05:41:22 PM »


I wouldn't describe the Bible as "dry and dusty words on a page."


I wouldn't either (not necessarily), but some interpret the Bible in such a way as to render it dry and dusty.

Quote

"My Lord God, I have no idea where I am going.
I do not see the road ahead of me.  I cannot know for certain
where it will end.  Nor do I really know myself, and the fact that
I think I am following Your will does not mean that I am
actually doing so.  But I believe that the desire to please You
does in fact please You.  And I hope I have that desire in all that
I am doing.  I hope that I will never do anything apart from that
desire.  And I know that, if I do this, You will lead me by the
right road, though I may know nothing about it.  Therefore, I
will trust You always though I may seem to be lost and in the
shadow of death.  I will not fear, for You are ever with me, and
You will never leave me to face my perils alone."
                                                           (Thoughts In Solitude)


I love that too.  I have that framed and sitting beside my computer -- and I pray it often.
Logged
soterion
Hero
*****

Manna: 83
Offline Offline

Mood:

Gender: Male
Posts: 2491

Blog entries (0)

View Profile
« Reply #22 on: July 15, 2007, 05:48:47 PM »

It has been suggested that Paul was referring to the Old Testament and maybe the gospel accounts only when he penned 2 Timothy 3:16-17.  If that was the case, then all the rest of Scripture serves no good purpose and is not needed.

Remember that Paul said all Scripture is profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, for training in righteousness, that the man of God may be adequate, equipped for every good work. 

If just a limited amount of the Scriptures can do that for us, why do we need the rest?  I believe this should tell us that Paul was speaking both practically and prophetically of ALL Scripture, even that which had not yet been written (John's writings, for example).

Another suggested that the letters are not Scripture.  One reason I disagree with this is because Peter considered Paul's letters to be Scripture (2 Peter 3:15-16).

I was asked why do I believe we still have apostles but not prophets.  I don't believe we still have apostles today.  Read my post again.

So, why do I believe no more prophets (nor apostles) today?  The passage says ALL Scripture and EVERY good work.  What words from God are we lacking that we need more?  The answer is none.  Why do we need people who are receiving direct revelations from God to tell the rest of us His will if He gave all of that to everybody in ALL Scripture?  The answer is we don't need them.

If we want to say that God still speaks the same way He always has, then what is the meaning of Hebrews 1:1-2?  That passage says He doesn't still speak the same way that He used to.  Jesus has sent the Spirit to the apostles to remind them of all He taught them and to teach them all things (John 14:25-26; 16:12-15).  Now, all have the words they penned by the Spirit available to whoever wants them.

If prophets have been going around ever since the first century, then where are their words?  What words do we still need that we cannot otherwise know and do the will of God?  I still maintain that with all Scripture we are not lacking any words from God.
Logged

God bless...
blituri
Hero
*****

Manna: 169
Online Online

Mood:

Posts: 3381

Blog entries (0)

View Profile
« Reply #23 on: July 15, 2007, 05:57:50 PM »

You have to live longer than most preachers of a "direct voice from God" which misused Calvin calls "fanatics" to understand that SPIRIT means MIND.  You can get sermonized and versified and classified for 90 years and still not have a remote clue about the story line and the purpose of the Bible.

One Hebrew word has--it has been claimed--been translated by 61 different english words. The KJV says that they picked one word over the other at times for "pleasing variety" probably to keep it from being dry. I have read that the story of Genesis uses only about 70 root words and none of these have "definitions." Rather, we are faced with reading contemporaneous literture to see how a specific word is actually used down through the ages. If I am not wacko (my dog loves me), I can look at a passage and immediately see that it is a motiff or 'pattern' used many times: Jesus said that truth had been hidden in parables from the foundaton of the world and he spoke to the MASSES using parables.  The creation story is repeated at the flood, at the Red Sea and Israel was in the same void and empty state: ignorant and self-wasted. The same flood and Red Sea pattern was a type of baptism showing how God saves us OUT of the ignorance of the masses.

My great dilema is that I can take a chapter just about anywhere and spread it out on my computer. Then look up the Hebrew, Greek and Latin words. And, behold, the message is repeated in all of the "legends" which they called history and were not just myths. That is why the books of Moses debunks the Babylonian Legends which the same Hebrews had come out of and were condemned to return.  I have collected many of the translations 3,000 years older than Moses. You begin to see that God had Moses write a COUNTER CULTURAL prescriptive to prevent the Hebrews from falling back under superstition: it didn't work then and doesn't work now.

Frustration comes when one passage from Paul where he POINTS to Greek concepts, gods or worship, can fill a week and many pages which I try to crosslinek to parallels.  I think that as long as you listen to sermonizing--which came out of paganism about the time that singing did-- you will be purposfully prevented from becoming a Disciple. Until then, as Amos, Isaiah and others note, the rituals and music are MEANS to starve you to death for lack of the word.  Here is a small fraction of available information about the Music in Amos which was repeating the musical idolatry in the temple.  I don't claim to be prosey but this is a tiny collection of data about their worship. If I were ten people I could keep us busy just researching and posting raw data which no scholar ever heard about because they thought that it was DRY and the "audience" didn't care.

Link removed per forum rules.

I wail through outer space that the INSTITUTES have gulped up all of the money, created the anxiety Jesus died to remove, and intentionally PREVENTED the laity from knowing or speaking as the ekklesia demands. After 76 years I can say that I have never questioned a preacher who did not get defensive or hostile when I tried to share any truth with them. But, tougher than I, it seems that God has no use for the blind who can be led by the blind.

If the Bible is just dust, you might consider whether you are a christian which means STUDENT.  Jeremiah says that he ATE God's word. You may be in Babylon and need to escape.
« Last Edit: July 25, 2007, 08:34:08 AM by spurly » Logged
Christian Forums
« Reply #23 on: July 15, 2007, 05:57:50 PM »

 
 Logged
Less-of-Me
Guest
« Reply #24 on: July 15, 2007, 07:56:44 PM »

You have to live longer than most preachers of a "direct voice from God" which misused Calvin calls "fanatics" to understand that SPIRIT means MIND.  You can get sermonized and versified and classified for 90 years and still not have a remote clue about the story line and the purpose of the Bible.

One Hebrew word has--it has been claimed--been translated by 61 different english words. The KJV says that they picked one word over the other at times for "pleasing variety" probably to keep it from being dry. I have read that the story of Genesis uses only about 70 root words and none of these have "definitions." Rather, we are faced with reading contemporaneous literture to see how a specific word is actually used down through the ages. If I am not wacko (my dog loves me), I can look at a passage and immediately see that it is a motiff or 'pattern' used many times: Jesus said that truth had been hidden in parables from the foundaton of the world and he spoke to the MASSES using parables.  The creation story is repeated at the flood, at the Red Sea and Israel was in the same void and empty state: ignorant and self-wasted. The same flood and Red Sea pattern was a type of baptism showing how God saves us OUT of the ignorance of the masses.

My great dilema is that I can take a chapter just about anywhere and spread it out on my computer. Then look up the Hebrew, Greek and Latin words. And, behold, the message is repeated in all of the "legends" which they called history and were not just myths. That is why the books of Moses debunks the Babylonian Legends which the same Hebrews had come out of and were condemned to return.  I have collected many of the translations 3,000 years older than Moses. You begin to see that God had Moses write a COUNTER CULTURAL prescriptive to prevent the Hebrews from falling back under superstition: it didn't work then and doesn't work now.

Frustration comes when one passage from Paul where he POINTS to Greek concepts, gods or worship, can fill a week and many pages which I try to crosslinek to parallels.  I think that as long as you listen to sermonizing--which came out of paganism about the time that singing did-- you will be purposfully prevented from becoming a Disciple. Until then, as Amos, Isaiah and others note, the rituals and music are MEANS to starve you to death for lack of the word.  Here is a small fraction of available information about the Music in Amos which was repeating the musical idolatry in the temple.  I don't claim to be prosey but this is a tiny collection of data about their worship. If I were ten people I could keep us busy just researching and posting raw data which no scholar ever heard about because they thought that it was DRY and the "audience" didn't care.

http://www.piney.com/Amos-Five.html

I wail through outer space that the INSTITUTES have gulped up all of the money, created the anxiety Jesus died to remove, and intentionally PREVENTED the laity from knowing or speaking as the ekklesia demands. After 76 years I can say that I have never questioned a preacher who did not get defensive or hostile when I tried to share any truth with them. But, tougher than I, it seems that God has no use for the blind who can be led by the blind.

If the Bible is just dust, you might consider whether you are a christian which means STUDENT.  Jeremiah says that he ATE God's word. You may be in Babylon and need to escape.


Ooooooooooooooooo-kay.  I see where you're coming from now.  And I can see we will disagree on pretty much every thing.  So........

Peace to you, as I step out.  :o)
Logged
Christian Forums
« Reply #24 on: July 15, 2007, 07:56:44 PM »

 Logged
Less-of-Me
Guest
« Reply #25 on: July 15, 2007, 08:05:27 PM »

It has been suggested that Paul was referring to the Old Testament and maybe the gospel accounts only when he penned 2 Timothy 3:16-17.  If that was the case, then all the rest of Scripture serves no good purpose and is not needed.

Remember that Paul said all Scripture is profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, for training in righteousness, that the man of God may be adequate, equipped for every good work. 

If just a limited amount of the Scriptures can do that for us, why do we need the rest?  I believe this should tell us that Paul was speaking both practically and prophetically of ALL Scripture, even that which had not yet been written (John's writings, for example).

Another suggested that the letters are not Scripture.  One reason I disagree with this is because Peter considered Paul's letters to be Scripture (2 Peter 3:15-16).

I was asked why do I believe we still have apostles but not prophets.  I don't believe we still have apostles today.  Read my post again.

So, why do I believe no more prophets (nor apostles) today?  The passage says ALL Scripture and EVERY good work.  What words from God are we lacking that we need more?  The answer is none.  Why do we need people who are receiving direct revelations from God to tell the rest of us His will if He gave all of that to everybody in ALL Scripture?  The answer is we don't need them.

If we want to say that God still speaks the same way He always has, then what is the meaning of Hebrews 1:1-2?  That passage says He doesn't still speak the same way that He used to.  Jesus has sent the Spirit to the apostles to remind them of all He taught them and to teach them all things (John 14:25-26; 16:12-15).  Now, all have the words they penned by the Spirit available to whoever wants them.

If prophets have been going around ever since the first century, then where are their words?  What words do we still need that we cannot otherwise know and do the will of God?  I still maintain that with all Scripture we are not lacking any words from God.

Based on your words, I believe you and I view the Bible (and thus "the will of God" and the role of Christians, etc.) differently.  It would be difficult for me to explain further because I lack the patience -- my failing, I admit -- to show someone where I'm coming from via a discussion forum.  As someone who has spent years purposefully attempting to see other viewpoints in order to test my own, I understand how difficult it is to step outside of a personal belief system -- and I wouldn't want to ask that of someone who is unwilling to do so.

That sounds pretty snotty as written, but I mean it respectfully towards you.  You and I will have to agree to disagree.  :o)
Logged
apokalupsis
Member
***

Manna: 21
Offline Offline

Mood:

Gender: Male
Posts: 241


Following That Jesus Guy

Blog entries (0)

View Profile WWW
« Reply #26 on: July 15, 2007, 10:57:46 PM »

Amen! God does still speak to day in many different ways, even through dreams and visions. Just thought I'd add that in there.

Good point.  I think He does.  Announcement Sleeping
Logged

soterion
Hero
*****

Manna: 83
Offline Offline

Mood:

Gender: Male
Posts: 2491

Blog entries (0)

View Profile
« Reply #27 on: July 15, 2007, 11:30:28 PM »

It has been suggested that Paul was referring to the Old Testament and maybe the gospel accounts only when he penned 2 Timothy 3:16-17.  If that was the case, then all the rest of Scripture serves no good purpose and is not needed.

Remember that Paul said all Scripture is profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, for training in righteousness, that the man of God may be adequate, equipped for every good work. 

If just a limited amount of the Scriptures can do that for us, why do we need the rest?  I believe this should tell us that Paul was speaking both practically and prophetically of ALL Scripture, even that which had not yet been written (John's writings, for example).

Another suggested that the letters are not Scripture.  One reason I disagree with this is because Peter considered Paul's letters to be Scripture (2 Peter 3:15-16).

I was asked why do I believe we still have apostles but not prophets.  I don't believe we still have apostles today.  Read my post again.

So, why do I believe no more prophets (nor apostles) today?  The passage says ALL Scripture and EVERY good work.  What words from God are we lacking that we need more?  The answer is none.  Why do we need people who are receiving direct revelations from God to tell the rest of us His will if He gave all of that to everybody in ALL Scripture?  The answer is we don't need them.

If we want to say that God still speaks the same way He always has, then what is the meaning of Hebrews 1:1-2?  That passage says He doesn't still speak the same way that He used to.  Jesus has sent the Spirit to the apostles to remind them of all He taught them and to teach them all things (John 14:25-26; 16:12-15).  Now, all have the words they penned by the Spirit available to whoever wants them.

If prophets have been going around ever since the first century, then where are their words?  What words do we still need that we cannot otherwise know and do the will of God?  I still maintain that with all Scripture we are not lacking any words from God.

Based on your words, I believe you and I view the Bible (and thus "the will of God" and the role of Christians, etc.) differently.  It would be difficult for me to explain further because I lack the patience -- my failing, I admit -- to show someone where I'm coming from via a discussion forum.  As someone who has spent years purposefully attempting to see other viewpoints in order to test my own, I understand how difficult it is to step outside of a personal belief system -- and I wouldn't want to ask that of someone who is unwilling to do so.

That sounds pretty snotty as written, but I mean it respectfully towards you.  You and I will have to agree to disagree.  :o)

I do want to try to understand your point of view but giving up at the beginning doesn't help.  I know that I come across as so set in my ways that I am not willing to change, but I have changed my stance on a few things in the past due to discussions like this.  Sometimes we find that it was a matter of semantics rather than our having so radically different views.

How about trying to answer the questions in my post and I may see your point of view better?
Logged

God bless...
Christian Forums
« Reply #27 on: July 15, 2007, 11:30:28 PM »

 Logged
chandrus
Jesus Is Real!
Senior Member
****

Manna: 17
Offline Offline

Mood:

Gender: Male
Posts: 665


Blog entries (0)

View Profile WWW
« Reply #28 on: July 15, 2007, 11:35:55 PM »

Psm 25:14 The secret of the LORD is with them that fear him; and he will
shew them his covenant.
Logged

Col 1:28 Whom we preach, warning every man, and teaching every man in
all wisdom; that we may present every man perfect in Christ Jesus:

My Cup runneth over!

Know Jesus, Know Change.
No Jesus , No Change.
apokalupsis
Member
***

Manna: 21
Offline Offline

Mood:

Gender: Male
Posts: 241


Following That Jesus Guy

Blog entries (0)

View Profile WWW
« Reply #29 on: July 15, 2007, 11:57:49 PM »

It has been suggested that Paul was referring to the Old Testament and maybe the gospel accounts only when he penned 2 Timothy 3:16-17.  If that was the case, then all the rest of Scripture serves no good purpose and is not needed.

Remember that Paul said all Scripture is profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, for training in righteousness, that the man of God may be adequate, equipped for every good work. 

If just a limited amount of the Scriptures can do that for us, why do we need the rest?  I believe this should tell us that Paul was speaking both practically and prophetically of ALL Scripture, even that which had not yet been written (John's writings, for example).

Another suggested that the letters are not Scripture.  One reason I disagree with this is because Peter considered Paul's letters to be Scripture (2 Peter 3:15-16).

I was asked why do I believe we still have apostles but not prophets.  I don't believe we still have apostles today.  Read my post again.

So, why do I believe no more prophets (nor apostles) today?  The passage says ALL Scripture and EVERY good work.  What words from God are we lacking that we need more?  The answer is none.  Why do we need people who are receiving direct revelations from God to tell the rest of us His will if He gave all of that to everybody in ALL Scripture?  The answer is we don't need them.

I fear we've got apples and oranges. What IS prophecy?  Speaking the words of God?  How were they used in the past? Prophets made specific statements to individuals or groups.  They expound what has already been taught in Scripture, are consistent with and based in principles from Scripture, but they revealed specific information for a particular person or group.

Scripture can give you a principle or a rule, which is all you need to know regarding that principle or a rule.   Prophecy in the Bible, and prophecy in general gives specific information from God. 

Does God still speak through people? Didn't the Scripture say to eagerly desire the gift of prophecy? Was the Scripture wrong about dreams and visions in the last days?

What Scripture prophecied the end of God speaking to us? I Corinthians 13?

I Corinthians 13 says plainly prophecy will no longer be needed when we see Christ face to face because THEN "we will know fully even as we are fully known."

Or else knowledge is also gone.

Or else we must quit singing that hymn about seeing him face to face since it must have been talking of the coming of the New Testament instead of the Second Coming? 

Nah, we've just got a twisted view of prophecy because some kooks are claiming to be prophets.  My opinion.

If we want to say that God still speaks the same way He always has, then what is the meaning of Hebrews 1:1-2?  That passage says He doesn't still speak the same way that He used to.  Jesus has sent the Spirit to the apostles to remind them of all He taught them and to teach them all things (John 14:25-26; 16:12-15).  Now, all have the words they penned by the Spirit available to whoever wants them.

Jesus sent the Spirit to everyone. Acts 2:38. 
1Co 12:13  For by one Spirit we were all baptized into one body—whether Jews or Greeks, whether slaves or free—and have all been made to drink into one Spirit.

A barren relationship indeed if we are not on speaking terms with the Spirit.

Hebrews 1:1-2 was speaking of this Dispensational Period, and he went on to write that Jesus was the perfect representation of God and therefore what more needs to be said or proclaimed other than Jesus Christ in regards to God or our relationship with God? He spoke of the difference between this covenant and the earlier one by quoting:

Heb 10:16  "THIS IS THE COVENANT THAT I WILL MAKE WITH THEM AFTER THOSE DAYS, SAYS THE LORD: I WILL PUT MY LAWS INTO THEIR HEARTS, AND IN THEIR MINDS I WILL WRITE THEM,"
Heb 10:17  then He adds, "THEIR SINS AND THEIR LAWLESS DEEDS I WILL REMEMBER NO MORE."

How does writing words on more paper fully explain writing them on my heart?  They are written on my heart by the Spirit.  The New Covenant is not a new set of instructions, but a relationship, a new life.  It is the transforming power of the Spirit within everyone who believes.

An example is after Christ had come and returned to the Father, the Holy Spirit still needed to tell Phillip to "run up to that chariot."  There is no Scripture for me today that says, "go to that house on 2nd Street" yet the same Holy Spirit who is in me is the same one who told Phillip to "run up to that chariot."  God certainly speaks today in the same way, and if He does, He is speaking more specifically than just the Scriptures.

If prophets have been going around ever since the first century, then where are their words? 

I would say many prophetic things have been stated by men and women of God for centuries.  Those things are written down or recorded in many places.

What words do we still need that we cannot otherwise know and do the will of God?  I still maintain that with all Scripture we are not lacking any words from God.

Again, Scripture doesn't give you the specific "run up to that chariot" message or "take that job" message or "if you don't shape up I'll judge you" message or "I will take care of you and your family through this crisis message." 

Scripture cannot be that specific regarding individuals or individual groups, but prophecy is exactly that.

Logged

How God Speaks? - Pages: 1 [2] 3 Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  



Login with username, password and session length

Grace-Centered Christian Forums
Bible concordance | abortion ticker | is God real? | galaga | play tetris | copter game | mini golf games | arcade | donkey kong | Christian marriage help | articles | privacy
Powered by SMF | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC