I am already direct and honest. Not playing games like you suggest. Christ didn't mince words either.
You are indeed "direct."
I am not at all certain you are "honest." You are certainly arrogant, stubborn, graceless, foolish, and manifestly unchristlike.
Your position is false. Israel is not the church.
That's true, Gal. 6:16 notwithstanding. In terms of OT examples and arguments, I usually rely on things that predated the Law and Obsolete Covenant, mainly the original Creation. When I do cite examples like Deborah and Huldah, it is usually to show that even under the greater strictures of the Old ways before the Church, some few women were called to the highest positions in the people of God.
And your position relies on Galatians 3:28 to cancel out the rest of scripture. Your position arises from western feminism, and not scripture. Eisegesis of the text is used to prooftext and existing belief. Your position denies 1 Timothy 2, it denies 1 Timothy 3, it denies others.
No, we do not rely on just that one verse. It also relies on Acts 2, Rom. 16, Col. 4:15, among many others.
No, our understanding is not rooted in western feminism and read into the text. It arises from observing apparent conflicts among various Scriptures, and studying to resolve them.
No, our position does not "deny" 1 Tim. 2 or 3, or Tit. 1. It denies some particular translations, interpretations, and applications of those passages.
You want what you want, and bollocks to scriptures that disagree.
You need to stop using your twisted bollocks to do your thinking.
I hope you found that sufficiently "direct" and free of "game-playing."