K.K.K. HISTORY

[jeager]

The K.K.K. was started by disgruntled DEMOCRATS in the SOUTH.
Decidedly ticked because the South lost the Civil War and ended slavery.
At least slavery was ended by law but NOT in practice.
The original targets of the Ku Klux Klan were Republicans, both black and white, according to a new television program and book, which describe how the Democrats started the KKK and for decades harassed the GOP with lynchings and threats.

An estimated 3,446 blacks and 1,297 whites died at the end of KKK ropes from 1882 to 1964.
From:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2309727/posts

Google it. Lots of information on the net about the K.K.K. and the RELIGIOUS and
POLITICAL roots of the hate organization that STILL exists and is VERY ACTIVE to this day!

Few people today know the Klan also lynched CATHOLICS and Catholic priests with
reckless abandon!
Jews were also targeted, lynched, homes burned, kids murdered..........................
So did people rely on the local law for protection?
NO!
The local law WERE the Klan leaders!
The K.K.K. was a public political party for a long time but went pretty much underground
when the South lost the Civil War.
Klan membership isn't accurately known for obvious reasons but is estimated to be
several millions.
THERE ARE MORE KLAN MEMBERS IN THE NORTH THAN THE OLD SOUTH!

Working people today are sick and tired of minority groups crying for more
welfare and freebies because maybe, long ago, my great, grand pappy could have
perhaps been a salve.
Gimme, gimme, gimme, mo'!
I call em' "gimme" people.
Bear in mind I was a white police officer in a city over 50% "ethnic" and suffered 13
serious injuries at the hands of ethnic criminals.
Those injuries include my back being broken FOUR times.
I endured NINE months, five days a week, 5 hours a day, in painful rehab.
I lost use of my left leg and told I'd never walk again unaided.
Nine grueling months later I walk just fine but with permanent intractable pain.
Still I don't hate anyone or any group.
Fact is this po' white boy was RAISED by loving black people!

[chosenone]

What point are you trying to make?

[Rella]

What point are you trying to make?

I am not certain off the point the OP is trying to make but  for a very long time I have questioned why the blacks, in particular, generally vote democrat in this country.

Yes, it is all about the gimme that the OP has stated but it goes further.

They are the first to scream about slavery.. which was horrendous in its own right.

But they fail to realize that by being on the side of the democrats, for all the freebie stuff they are given, they are still under a form of slavery.

Just like slave masters housed and fed their "property" so do the political establisment
'take care ' of those who vote for them... thus the politicians are so elevated to the lives they want... knowing they are secure by the job of brainwashing they have done.

Yes.. I know that is only my opinion... but it is my opinion

[4WD]

There is a very interesting book, Unfounded Loyalty: An In-Depth Look Into The Love Affair Between Blacks and Democrats by Wayne Perryman.  Perryman, a black professor at Washington State University (I think), gives some new insights into the false assumptions about the role the Democratic Party as supporters of civil-rights and black voters. In an investigative style, Perryman reveals the deceptions which are part of America's untold history. Unfounded Loyalty is a compelling, well researched and documented historical study.

The book doesn't say it directly, but it points out the deficiency of the Republican message to the black community.  What Perryman shows is that almost every benefit to the Blacks in America as a result of legislative action have come by way of the Republicans not the Democrats.

[RB]

There is a very interesting book, Unfounded Loyalty: An In-Depth Look Into The Love Affair Between Blacks and Democrats by Wayne Perryman.  Perryman, a black professor at Washington State University (I think), gives some new insights into the false assumptions about the role the Democratic Party as supporters of civil-rights and black voters. In an investigative style, Perryman reveals the deceptions which are part of America's untold history. Unfounded Loyalty is a compelling, well researched and documented historical study.

The book doesn't say it directly, but it points out the deficiency of the Republican message to the black community.  What Perryman shows is that almost every benefit to the Blacks in America as a result of legislative action have come by way of the Republicans not the Democrats.

Of course this is so. There are some good black people whose eyes have been opened to the false affection shown toward their race by lying democrats just to receive their votes, and once received, then they are neglected as though they do not exist. Actually, the white democracts are much more racists than white republicans, the proof is in their actions. The black race has a few enemies within their camp, lying radical democrats, Jesse Jackson, and Al Sharpton, Condoleezza Rice's look alike. 

[Texas Conservative]

There is a very interesting book, Unfounded Loyalty: An In-Depth Look Into The Love Affair Between Blacks and Democrats by Wayne Perryman.  Perryman, a black professor at Washington State University (I think), gives some new insights into the false assumptions about the role the Democratic Party as supporters of civil-rights and black voters. In an investigative style, Perryman reveals the deceptions which are part of America's untold history. Unfounded Loyalty is a compelling, well researched and documented historical study.

The book doesn't say it directly, but it points out the deficiency of the Republican message to the black community.  What Perryman shows is that almost every benefit to the Blacks in America as a result of legislative action have come by way of the Republicans not the Democrats.

The black community was hooked on Democrats and the black family (as a whole) destroyed with LBJ's Great Society.

[4WD]

There is a very interesting book, Unfounded Loyalty: An In-Depth Look Into The Love Affair Between Blacks and Democrats by Wayne Perryman.  Perryman, a black professor at Washington State University (I think), gives some new insights into the false assumptions about the role the Democratic Party as supporters of civil-rights and black voters. In an investigative style, Perryman reveals the deceptions which are part of America's untold history. Unfounded Loyalty is a compelling, well researched and documented historical study.

The book doesn't say it directly, but it points out the deficiency of the Republican message to the black community.  What Perryman shows is that almost every benefit to the Blacks in America as a result of legislative action have come by way of the Republicans not the Democrats.

The black community was hooked on Democrats and the black family (as a whole) destroyed with LBJ's Great Society.

LBJ's Great Society  --  The great utopia straight out of Karl Marx's The Communist Manifesto.  And that was just another in a long line of moves to the hard left that is destroying the country.

[Pkbrother]

Some history is that the KKK was started by the democrats and there First Grand Master or whatever
was Jefferson Davis exconfederate president who had just been released by the north after being investigated for the assasination of lincoln.  I believe Johnson made a statement about enslaving blacks to vote democrat for 200 years if they could get them on foodstamps.

[Jd34]

Some history is that the KKK was started by the democrats and there First Grand Master or whatever
was Jefferson Davis exconfederate president who had just been released by the north after being investigated for the assasination of lincoln.  I believe Johnson made a statement about enslaving blacks to vote democrat for 200 years if they could get them on foodstamps.

The KKK are disgusting on their own. So much so that it's unfair to even the Democratic way of governing to suggest or to imply that the ungodly organisation  has any part of it.

[Pkbrother]

I am not hear to slam the democrats as the republicans have their own problems.....
I am from Texas and have seen close friends caught up in controlling churches or movements that are almost cultic!!!!!
This is my definition of slavery or controlling group or cult or whatever you might call it:
You are not able to criticize or disagree with the group or leader without being scolded or reprimanded with fear mongoring:
The leader of the group has all authority....
Leaving the group is highly criticized and disfellowshiped for life.....
I am applying this to the Democrats as I dont believe very few ever criticized the President without being called racists or bigots or....homophobes......
In fact the only ranking democrat  I know to have ever disagreed publicly with Obama was Bill Clinton!!!!!!!
I have seen Blacks who have been covertly and overtly criticized just because they are black republicans.....
Is this pressure to conform prominent among democrats blacks.... or am i missing something....

[The Barbarian]

The K.K.K. was a public political party for a long time but went pretty much underground
when the South lost the Civil War.

It wasn't founded until after the Civil War.

Why do blacks vote democrat?   They didn't use to do that.   Wasn't until the republicans embraced segregationists that they shifted their loyalty.    Like every other American subgroup, they vote for people who are willing to do what they want.   If republicans changed back, black voters would change back.   

Minorities are just like everyone else in that respect.   George W. Bush liked and respected Hispanics, and got a large number of them to vote for him.    Other republicans just don't like them very much, and of course, Hispanics aren't dumb.   They don't vote for people like that.

No mystery there.

[dpr]

Something else, the idea that the war between the states began over the issue of slavery is propaganda against the Southern people.

The majority of the Southern people didn't even own slaves; only about 10% of Southerners owned slaves. And there were also Black Confederate units that fought on the side of the Confederacy. One should give a listen to Mr. H.K. Edgerton, a Black supporter of Black Confederates that fought for the Confederacy...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BUw_P6w8Rdw


What actually began the war between the states in America? It was because of violation by the industrialists and politicians in the North of the Constitution of The United States of America against the Southern states.

Prior to the war, wealthy and influential Southerners were trading with Europe, selling cotton to Europe and buying manufactured goods from Europe. Northern industrialists and politicians apparently saw Southern trade with Europe as a threat to their power in the North. So the Northern industrialists and politicians got a Tariff passed forcing the South to sell their cotton to the North and buy manufactured goods from the North only, and at the prices the Northern industrialists set.

The people in the Southern U.S. saw that as a direct violation of states rights per the U.S. Constitution, and thus began to secede from the Union which was a right provided the states per the U.S. Constitution. In retaliation, Lincoln, serving the Northern industrialists and politicians, illegally invaded the South with 75,000 Union troops.

Abraham Lincoln was not who Northern propaganda history paints him as. In the Lincoln - Douglas debates when campaigning for President, Lincoln then had said if between the white man and black man one must be superior, he preferred the white man. Lincoln also said in those debates that he had no intention of ending slavery. Those debates are recorded in the U.S. Congressional Record if anyone doubts that Lincoln said those things.

The reason why Lincoln said he had no intention of ending slavery when running for President was because there were many slave owners in the North also. The first slaves brought into the American colonies actually came in to New York and Boston, not the South which was later. Slavery was originally a British institution. By the time of the 1830's Britain was in the process of ending slavery in their own country.

Many of the Northern peoples complained that the war was "a rich man's war". Once the small army Lincoln sent to invade the South was defeated, he began a draft. The people of New York city burned down two draft houses, that's how much the Northern people were against what Lincoln and the rich industrialists and politicians were doing.

By 1862 the Confederate armies were defeating the Union armies. That is when Lincoln agreed with Congress and Northern bankers to issue millions of dollar "greenbacks", fiat paper dollars not backed by any coin, to finance the Union side. (thus Northern bankers increased another step towards control of the U.S. economy, on the way to the Federal Reserve Act of 1913).

In 1863, Lincoln proposed the Emancipation Proclamation about freeing the slaves in both the North and the South. That... is when slavery became an issue for the Northern peoples, as the Union armies did not know originally what they were fighting about before, but now, they had a cause, freeing the slaves.

The fact that the Proclamation came out in 1863, three years after the war had begun, is a major sign that the issue of slavery is not actually what caused the war between North and South. It was an issue of debate before the war, but was not the actual issue that caused the war. The rich industrialists and politicians are who caused it. And today it's easy to see the final result of what they have done to the American people, controlling our wealth, our freedom, our livelihood, our children's education, and their continual thirst for wealth made from fake wars.

[Texas Conservative]

It isn't propaganda.  Slavery wasn't the whole issue but it was a big part of it.

[dpr]

Slavery was not a big part of the war between the states until... 1863 when Lincoln drafted the Emancipation Proclamation. The war had been going on for 3 years before that proclamation was made. Thus the idea that slavery was the issue that caused the war between the states is nothing but propaganda, and Lincoln was a tyrant and puppet of the wealthy industrialists and bankers. And since the victors get to write the history, ever since then American children have been taught a lie.

It isn't propaganda.  Slavery wasn't the whole issue but it was a big part of it.