News:

Our Hosting and Server Costs Are Expensive! Please Subscribe To Help With Monthly Donations.

Main Menu
+-+-

+-User

Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
 
 
 
Forgot your password?

+-Stats ezBlock

Members
Total Members: 89501
Latest: Reirric
New This Month: 0
New This Week: 0
New Today: 0
Stats
Total Posts: 897729
Total Topics: 90324
Most Online Today: 350
Most Online Ever: 31148
(Tue Oct 13, 2026 - 23:44:57)
Users Online
Members: 1
Guests: 370
Total: 371
Cally
Google (3)

Not a complaint; just a question

Started by Brian Kelley, Fri Nov 30, 2007 - 01:41:52

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Brian Kelley

What is the purpose of rule 3.3?  It's a bit annoying to me.  I know there has to be a purpose though, so that's why I'm asking.  It just seems to me that it would be better to see what new members had to say through their links instead of waiting so very long for their allowance to post them.  I've been curious on a number of occasions and may never find out what those links would have been to.  That's my issue.  Maybe you can put my mind to rest by giving the basis for the rule?  I'd appreciate it.

Bon Voyage

Quote from: Brian Kelley on Fri Nov 30, 2007 - 01:41:52
What is the purpose of rule 3.3?  It's a bit annoying to me.  I know there has to be a purpose though, so that's why I'm asking.  It just seems to me that it would be better to see what new members had to say through their links instead of waiting so very long for their allowance to post them.  I've been curious on a number of occasions and may never find out what those links would have been to.  That's my issue.  Maybe you can put my mind to rest by giving the basis for the rule?  I'd appreciate it.

The vast majority of those who start out with a bunch of links are spammers.  It isn't too much to ask to stay around awhile before posting links.

Jaime

twenty posts (which is the minimum for posting a link, I believe) is only 2 or 3  of days for if one is active at all.

I made the mistake of opening up several since I have been here that were pornographic to the max. Of course the moderators quickly removed the link and the perv was banned.

Nevertheless

New members [<20 posts] are allowed to include a web address in their post without making it a link, right?

Jimbob

A link is a link and a web address is a link.  However, there's no prohibition as I understand it, on them including their website in their profile like all other members, so long as it fits Lee's guidelines and has a link-back.

DCR

The display may try to automatically display web addresses as links anyway.  But, I think posting any kind of external web addresses is not allowed under the rule.

(oops... jmg and I were posting at the same time)

Basherbelding

Well, New members may spam using links the more cool members wont. I am a new member but i dont spam.

+-Recent Topics

AI, chatgpt, etc by Cally
Today at 03:54:11

When was Abraham justified by Dave...
Yesterday at 13:51:09

What does a Christian do concerning immigrants, and obeying the law of the land? by The Barbarian
Yesterday at 12:16:25

Creation scientists by The Barbarian
Yesterday at 12:06:24

Revelation 12:7-9, Archangel Saint Michael by pppp
Yesterday at 11:20:33

SDA Issues by Amo
Yesterday at 09:07:53

Roman politics by Amo
Yesterday at 09:07:15

Sabbath, Sunday, and Legalism by Amo
Yesterday at 08:50:12

Unresolvable Contradictions from a literal Rich Man and Lazarus by Amo
Yesterday at 08:06:12

Philippians 2:2, Unity by pppp
Wed Oct 21, 2026 - 12:17:02

Powered by EzPortal