England

[Amo]

More about the problems in the UK.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lm53Eln4yVI

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R1LJoKb4opk

[Amo]

This explains a lot of what is happening in the UK.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keir_Starmer

Quotes from article below are from link above. Emphasis is mine.

Sir Keir Rodney Starmer KCB KC (/ˈkɪər/ ⓘ KEER; born 2 September 1962) is a British politician and barrister who has served as Prime Minister of the United Kingdom since 5 July 2024 and as Leader of the Labour Party since 2020. A lifelong member and supporter of the Labour Party, he previously served as Leader of the Opposition from 2020 to 5 July 2024, has been Member of Parliament (MP) for Holborn and St Pancras since 2015, and was Director of Public Prosecutions from 2008 to 2013.

Born in London and raised in Surrey, Starmer attended the selective state Reigate Grammar School. He was politically active from an early age and joined the Labour Party Young Socialists when he was 16. Starmer graduated with a Bachelor of Laws degree from the University of Leeds in 1985 and gained a postgraduate Bachelor of Civil Law degree from the University of Oxford where he was a student at St Edmund Hall, Oxford in 1986. After being called to the bar, Starmer practised predominantly in criminal defence work, specialising in human rights. He served as a human rights adviser to the Northern Ireland Policing Board and was appointed a Queen's Counsel in 2002. During his tenure as Director of Public Prosecutions and head of the Crown Prosecution Service, he dealt with a number of major cases, including the Stephen Lawrence murder case. He was appointed Knight Commander of the Order of the Bath (KCB) in the 2014 New Year Honours for services to law and criminal justice.

Starmer was influenced by his Northern Ireland policing work to pursue a political career, and was elected to the House of Commons at the 2015 general election. He supported the Remain campaign in the 2016 European Union membership referendum and advocated a proposed second referendum on Brexit. He served in Jeremy Corbyn's shadow cabinet latterly as Shadow Brexit Secretary, and following Corbyn's resignation after Labour's defeat at the 2019 general election, Starmer succeeded him by winning the 2020 leadership election on a left-wing platform. As opposition leader, he moved Labour toward the political centre and emphasised the elimination of antisemitism within the party, and his party made significant gains in the 2023 and 2024 local elections.

Starmer led Labour to a landslide victory at the 2024 general election, ending 14 years of Conservative government, with Labour becoming the largest party in the House of Commons. Domestically, Starmer said he will focus on economic growth, planning system reforms, infrastructure, energy, healthcare, education, childcare, and strengthening workers' rights, all of which were outlined in the 2024 election manifesto. He is also establishing a Border Security Command to replace the Rwanda asylum plan, and is in the process of establishing a national violent disorder programme amid ongoing riots across the country following the Southport stabbing. In foreign policy, Starmer has supported Ukraine in its war against Russia and Israel in its war against Hamas, but has also called for an immediate ceasefire in the Gaza Strip since February 2024, after previously declining to call for one..............

In his teenage years, Starmer was active in Labour Party politics and was a member of the Labour Party Young Socialists at the age of 16. He was a junior exhibitioner at the Guildhall School of Music and Drama until the age of 18, and played the flute, piano, recorder and violin. In the early 1980s, Starmer was caught by police illegally selling ice creams while trying to raise money during a holiday on the French Riviera. He escaped the incident without punishment, beyond the ice creams being confiscated. Starmer studied law at the University of Leeds, becoming a member of the university's Labour Club and graduating with first-class honours and a Bachelor of Laws (LLB) degree in 1985, becoming the first member of his family to graduate. He undertook postgraduate studies at the University of Oxford where he was a student at St Edmund Hall, Oxford, graduating with Bachelor of Civil Law (BCL) degree in 1986...................

Starmer was called to the bar in several Caribbean countries, where he defended convicts sentenced to the death penalty. In 1999, he was a junior barrister on Lee Clegg's appeal. Starmer assisted Helen Steel and David Morris in the McLibel case, in the trial and appeal in English courts, also represented them at the European court. Starmer was appointed Queen's Counsel on 9 April 2002, aged 39. In the same year, he became joint head of Doughty Street Chambers. In 2005, Starmer stated "I got made a Queen's Counsel, which is odd since I often used to propose the abolition of the monarchy". Starmer marched and authored legal opinions against the Iraq War following the 2003 invasion of Iraq, stating in 2015 that he believed that the war was "not lawful under international law because there was no UN resolution expressly authorising it".......................

During the 2016 European Union membership referendum, Starmer supported the Britain Stronger in Europe campaign for the UK to remain in the European Union (EU). He became a member of the parliamentarian groups Labour Friends of Israel and Labour Friends of Palestine and the Middle East. Starmer was urged by a number of activists to stand in the 2015 Labour Party leadership election following the resignation of Ed Miliband as Leader of the Labour Party after the party's defeat at the 2015 general election. He ruled this out, citing his relative lack of political experience at the time. During the leadership election, Starmer supported Andy Burnham, who finished second to Jeremy Corbyn.....

[Amo]

https://www.lifesitenews.com/analysis/uks-new-prime-minister-keir-starmer-moves-toward-digital-tyranny-in-response-to-civil-unrest/

Quoted article below from link above.

UK's new Prime Minister Keir Starmer moves toward digital tyranny in response to civil unrest

U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer has announced an expansion of facial recognition technology and online censorship in response to widespread civil unrest following the murder of three girls by the 17-year-old son of Rwandan immigrants.

Four weeks later, the nation is wracked by violent disorder following the murder of three girls by the son of Rwandan immigrants.

Three girls aged six, seven, and nine were stabbed to death by Axel Muganwa Rudakubana on Monday, July 29. He is charged with their murder and with the attempted murder of eight further girls aged between five and 10 years old, along with that of two adults – all seriously injured in his attack on a dance class in Hart Street, Southport.

Rudakubana, who took a taxi to kill the children, has been described as a "quiet choir boy" and was formerly featured in a BBC charity video in support of "Children in Need." Mainstream media described him as a "boy from Cardiff." Later reports of his "ferocious attack" confirmed he had been born in the Welsh capital to Rwandan parents.

With nothing said about the decades of open borders which has seen eight million migrants arrive in Britain since 2001, the British state has used the crisis it has created to move towards digital tyranny.

In a statement broadcasted on August 1, Starmer blamed a "tiny mindless minority" for the furious disorder sparked by the killings. He vowed to introduce a "national capability" of mass surveillance in response, whilst threatening censorship and prosecution of social media companies.

"The actions of a tiny, mindless minority in our society," Starmer said, will see him "establish a national capability, across police forces ... shared intelligence ... wider deployment of facial recognition technology."

As Starmer announced a new police unit to crack down on violent disorder, an adviser to the U.K. government has demanded the introduction of "COVID-style" lockdowns to suppress nationwide fury over the lawlessness created by mass migration and a regime openly hostile to those who have to inhabit its consequences.

The term "anarcho-tyranny" is applied to a system of government which terrorizes its own populations with disorder in order to justify crackdowns to increase its own power.

This term seems to fit the picture of Starmer's Britain today.

'Mass surveillance threatens democracy'

Big Brother Watch has warned that the expanded use of facial recognition "threatens rather than protects democracy," as it "turns the public into walking ID cards." In a press release, the group – which campaigns against creeping technological authoritarianism as exampled in the dystopian novel 1984 – said in a press release on August 1:

The Prime Minister's alarming pledge today to roll out facial recognition in an apparent response to recent disorder is a pledge to plunder more vital police resources on mass surveillance that threatens rather than protects democracy.

Big Brother Watch's Silkie Carlo explained the technology is banned in Europe – and may itself be illegal in the U.K.:

This AI surveillance turns members of the public into walking ID cards, is dangerously inaccurate and has no explicit legal basis in the UK. Whilst common in Russia and China, live facial recognition is banned in Europe.

Starmer repeated his threat on Sunday, August 4, to crack down on "far-right thugs," saying "the full force of the law" would be applied those involved – whether online or in person – in the disturbances sparked by the horrific murders, and enabled by years of liberal globalist government policy.

Media reports have blamed "online misinformation" for fueling the violent disorder which has followed the appalling mass killing of English children. Yet critics have also pointed out that Starmer refused to mention the "causes of crime."

In one of two questions, a U.K. reporter gently suggested that government policy and the outrageous murder itself may explain the "motive" behind nationwide civil unrest. Starmer replied, "It doesn't matter."

Starmer vowed instead to "protect Muslims ... and those attacked for their skin color and their faith" as he erased any context except racism for the motives of the outraged.

"This is not [a] protest," he said. "It is organized violent thuggery, and it has no place on our streets or online."

Strongly condemning attacks on "places of worship," he said nothing of the 150 churches which have been burned down in the U.K. between 2017 and 2022. Disgusted by the "violence ... of far-right thugs," he has recently promised three billion pounds per year to Ukraine, and he stated in October 2023 that Israel "has the right" cut off food and water supplies to Gaza in its ongoing genocide. He denied saying this later, despite being recorded doing so.

So far, his government has not suspended arms sales to Israel.

As one concerned citizen pointed out on X, the state denouncing violence against itself has "made up a virus, injected people with poison, divided societies ... destroyed the economy whilst simultaneously robbing it," saying that these are "the same people who are ... allowing your country to be invaded & are trying their hardest to start World War Three."

By contrast, Starmer's no-context remarks erase the past and present actions of the liberal globalist order he represents.

Starmer: healing the nation?

Starmer, who became prime minister four weeks ago, has stated his preference "for Davos" over Westminster in the past, clearly signaling his preference for the globalist order over the national sovereignty and democracy of the British Parliament.

Record low turnout in the July 4 general election saw the Labour Party win a massive majority with over 400 seats – on the smallest number of votes it has won in 84 years.

In his first speech as prime minister on July 5, Starmer promised to end the "chaos" in Britain and assured the nation his government would rebuild public trust by its actions – not its words

This lack of trust can only be healed by actions, not words. I know that. ... Whether you voted Labour or not, in fact, especially if you did not, I say to you directly: my government will serve you. Politics can be a force for good. We will show that. ... Because no matter how fierce the storms of history [are], one of the great strengths of this nation has always been our ability to navigate away to calmer waters.

Starmer has made two public addresses in the aftermath of the mass killing of children by the son of Rwandan immigrants. The outrage follows weeks of reports of migrant crime, following decades of the organized rape of British children "on an industrial scale" by immigrant "grooming gangs."

In 2015, Labour MP for Rotherham Sarah Champion said up to one million children had been raped by largely immigrant sex gangs. The latest report from January 2024 on the nationwide scandal says children have been "left at the mercy" of rapists, who are roaming free.

Starmer's approval ratings have plummeted, with many saying he has added fuel to the fire. Starmer repeated his charge that "far-right racist thugs" are the problem, vowing to protect immigrants from the British people outraged at the crime wave fueled by mass migration driven by globalist wars.

Starmer is an activist lawyer, like Tony Blair before him. He is joined in his agenda by at least one more activist lawyer, who is suggesting Nigel Farage's Reform Party be thrown out of Parliament on the same charges of far-right extremism.

Farage has said Starmer "hasn't got a clue," as attacks on the Reform leader rise in the press. Reform won over four million votes to return five members of Parliament, all of whom may now face expulsion for the charge of "giving legitimacy to violent protesters."

British deep state intelligence asset Paul Mason has called for all media to be shut down which disagrees with the liberal globalist agenda he serves.

Starmer sets the nation ablaze

Fair Cop, a campaign group seeking to "remove politics from policing," has joined many critics in saying Starmer's words had turned a tragedy into a national crisis.

"Last week, Starmer set the nation on fire."

'Two-tier Keir'

The group reposted a statement from the U.K.'s most senior civilian police commissioner. Now withdrawn due to suspected government pressure under Starmer's information crackdown, it accused the prime minister of pursuing a "two-tier" policing policy, with "the full force of the law" thrown at "far-right" protesters – but not at the armed and masked migrants and Muslims seen roaming Britain's streets.

Starmer said on Sunday, "To those who feel targeted because of the colour of your skin ... or your faith ... I know how frightening this must be."

Videos have circulated showing police standing by as mobs attack white British protesters, then leave a man critically injured. The police did not pursue the attackers.

"I think he's dead."

After this attack, police politely requested the same mob to leave their weapons at the mosque.

One Sky News report on "violent far-right riots" saw an armed masked gang of men of migrant background pass by, with no police in sight.

Even the BBC reported on the violence used by immigrant mobs against police and "pro-British demonstrators."

Rebellion against mass migration?

Donna Jones, police and crime commissioner for Hampshire, was quoted in local news as saying the government was refusing to admit that "mass uncontrolled immigration" was fuelling the same "rebellion that has played out across France". Jones explained that the protestors, whose violence she condemned, did indeed have motives which mattered. Her public statement was taken down after attracting widespread support – and criticism – from each side of the divide. She said:

Whilst the devastating attacks in Southport on Tuesday were a catalyst, the commonality amongst the protest groups appears to be focused on three key areas; the desire to protect Britain's sovereignty; the need to uphold British values and in order to do this, stop illegal immigration.

She warned of the public mood, comparing it to that of France, which has seen widespread rioting and police and former generals warning of civil war.

The growth of feeling across the country has mirrored (to a lesser extent) the rebellion to illegal immigration that has played out across France over the last 12 months.

Jones said the Government is not addressing the cause but the symptoms of the problem – which has been caused by the liberal globalist policies of three decades of successive Labour and Conservative governments.

The Government must acknowledge what is causing this civil unrest in order to prevent it.

Arresting people, or creating violent disorder units, is treating the symptom and not the cause.

Reflecting the fact that every U.K. government elected since 1993 has promised to bring down immigration, she said this was the question which remains unanswered.

The questions these people want answering; what is the Government's solution to mass uncontrolled immigration?

She complained that in an extraordinary move, neither she nor any of the U.K.'s community-elected crime commissioners had been invited to government meetings to shape the response to this mounting national crisis. She now faces calls to resign. Fair Cop greeted the news of the removal of her statement with a simple message:

Welcome to Keir Starmer's police state.

Culture of silence

One reason for Starmer's silence on the causes of this crime against the British nation is his own complicity in it. In 2003, Starmer was the lawyer who acted to secure the automatic right to free money, food, and hotel accommodation for a group of illegal migrants. Twenty-one years on, an estimated seven million immigrants have arrived in Britain. With migration levels rocketing, the U.K. population is projected to rise to almost 80 million by 2046, adding 16 million in the next 20 years – largely due to immigration.

Astonishingly, Starmer used his second address to the nation to say "people in this country have a right to be safe," as the nation is wracked by fury at the fact their children can be killed at any time in the chaos he has helped to create.

As he said the motive behind public anger "doesn't matter," Starmer said "the motivation for vast majority of the people in this country is to see their streets safe."

Whilst Starmer can see no motive beyond "racist ... far-right thuggery," Tony Blair himself has warned of the danger of failing to address the crisis caused by mass migration.

Rachel Reeves, Starmer's Chancellor of the Exchequer, warned in 2016 that "riots could sweep Britain if immigration is not curbed" – a surmise marked by its absence from the Labour government's move to designate the victims of crime as the enemy of the state. It is a move towards the digital identities Blair himself has promoted as recently as last week. The move will require the "a little persuading" of the public, Blair claimed last month, as he touted digital IDs as a means of managing mass migration.

"We should move as the world is moving to digital ID," he said at the Tony Blair Institute for Global Change conference, saying digital ID was a way to "control immigration."

The plan appears to replace not only the population, but democracy itself – with a transition to AI-driven digital governance powered by the liberal globalist algorithm.

In response to Starmer's divisive digital tyranny, thousands of ordinary Britons have identified themselves as "far-right thugs." The polarizing statements of the prime minister have united ordinary people against them, which ignore their outrage over the danger to the public presented by uncontrolled mass migration.

Former police and armed forces members, parents and grandparents are among those embracing the label under #FarRightThugsUnite.

One "far-right" black man notes the contrast between Starmer's response to the Black Lives Matter riots and the protests by British people.

In an historic moment of sectarian unity, Irish Nationalists and Ulster British Nationalists have united to fight back against the chaos of mass migration. 500 years of sectarian division in Northern Ireland made the unity of Irish people an impossible dream. Until now.

Globalist 'democracy'

The demand to lower immigration has been made for 30 years through the electoral process, as the liberal globalist consensus has pursued its own agenda regardless of the will of its electorate. Democracy has denied the British people a voice for decades.

Starmer has divided the nation, vowing to use the law to prosecute those who complain of the living hell these globalist policies have made of their lives. His strategy of digital surveillance and censorship reflects the last resort of liberal globalism, which has taken similar measures across the U.S. and Europe. These governments cannot fix the problem, because their policies have created the problem.

Liberal globalists are the problem, and they are using the name of the law to criminalize and silence anyone who disagrees with them, in words or in action. This is the last resort of the liberal order – and it is deeply illiberal to imprison your political enemies.

The enemy of the liberal globalist order are their own populations, and this order is now creating chaos in the name of the law to justify a permanent digital tyranny. It is fighting for its life against those of its own people.

It is hard to see how any words or actions from Keir Starmer can restore order to a Britain broken by globalist regime change. How far wrong can he be? So far, there is plenty of force promised by Keir Starmer's government, but none of it for good.

[Amo]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DJqyfMfPC4k

Watch out Americans. Now the UK will come after you, if you dare to post that which the UK government deems illegal on social media. Of course they will have the support of the Democrats and lefties here for doing so. Not to mention the support without a doubt, of every petty tyrannical globalist elitist form of international government already trying to destroy any and all personal or national sovereignty. The UK is demonstrating to all, what lies ahead for all of humanity under the ever increasingly intoxicating influence of BABYLON THE GREAT.

If I remember correctly, Joe Biden's Hate Crime Bill, already allows for such actions against those who would author anything the lefty loonies might claim as the cause of any problems which might arise for their agendas. As long as they can tie the supposed perpetrators to that written in any way shape or form. As in the perpetrators may have actually read what someone wrote, that they can therefore blame the perpetrators actions upon the author. I'll have to look back into that to be sure. 

[Amo]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u1nwwF2mw5E

Coming to America soon?

[Amo]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HwPPuS5C1o4

Unwanted unsustainable migration everywhere.

[Amo]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0lyCmcJLVFU

More from the UK soon to arrive in the USA. Odd is it not, that the USA, UK, and so much of Europe are all going through such similar experiences. Gee, I wonder who could be behind all of this? Globalist elitist organizations of course come to mind. To whom obviously, our politicians are listening to over and above their citizens.

[Amo]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UBVP7x3Dgis

Nigel Farage.

[Amo]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lDrLeCbwB4s

Yet another stabbing in the UK. Another woman dead, teenage girl and elderly man in serious condition. Stabbings obviously on the increase. Poor Brits. They have been disarmed of one of the worlds best equalizers for self defense, and are increasingly falling victim to knife wielding loonies and or terrorists.

A perfect example of their own traitorous government causing a dangerous situation for its own citizens, and then using the crisis they caused as an excuse to set up unwanted authoritarian  government control over all. This through mass migration of peoples and or cultures that will not or simply do not integrate with British society unto eventual civil unrest. Many of the migrants themselves coming from countries of authoritarian governments, who will no doubt more readily accept the imposition of said forms of government to resolve such issues.

The intentional destabilization of free republics or democracies, through mass migrations, unto authoritarian government to rectify the situation. Asymmetrical warfare. Crimes against humanity and sovereign peoples and nations, by globalist international organizations, and their minion politicians and citizens from within the various sovereign nations they betray. All of course steering toward the real ultimate goal of a global authoritative government and economic system.

Who could be behind such a villainous plot? Emphasis in the following quote is mine.

Excerpt from -
ENCYCLICAL LETTER
CARITAS IN VERITATE
OF THE SUPREME PONTIFF
BENEDICT XVI
TO THE BISHOPS
PRIESTS AND DEACONS
MEN AND WOMEN RELIGIOUS
THE LAY FAITHFUL
AND ALL PEOPLE OF GOOD WILL
ON INTEGRAL HUMAN DEVELOPMENT
IN CHARITY AND TRUTH

67. In the face of the unrelenting growth of global interdependence, there is a strongly felt need, even in the midst of a global recession, for a reform of the United Nations Organization, and likewise of economic institutions and international finance, so that the concept of the family of nations can acquire real teeth. One also senses the urgent need to find innovative ways of implementing the principle of the responsibility to protect and of giving poorer nations an effective voice in shared decision-making. This seems necessary in order to arrive at a political, juridical and economic order which can increase and give direction to international cooperation for the development of all peoples in solidarity. To manage the global economy; to revive economies hit by the crisis; to avoid any deterioration of the present crisis and the greater imbalances that would result; to bring about integral and timely disarmament, food security and peace; to guarantee the protection of the environment and to regulate migration: for all this, there is urgent need of a true world political authority, as my predecessor Blessed John XXIII indicated some years ago. Such an authority would need to be regulated by law, to observe consistently the principles of subsidiarity and solidarity, to seek to establish the common good, and to make a commitment to securing authentic integral human development inspired by the values of charity in truth. Furthermore, such an authority would need to be universally recognized and to be vested with the effective power to ensure security for all, regard for justice, and respect for rights. Obviously it would have to have the authority to ensure compliance with its decisions from all parties, and also with the coordinated measures adopted in various international forums. Without this, despite the great progress accomplished in various sectors, international law would risk being conditioned by the balance of power among the strongest nations.The integral development of peoples and international cooperation require the establishment of a greater degree of international ordering, marked by subsidiarity, for the management of globalization. They also require the construction of a social order that at last conforms to the moral order, to the interconnection between moral and social spheres, and to the link between politics and the economic and civil spheres, as envisaged by the Charter of the United Nations.

Gee I wonder who the Vatican considers the moral authority which all others should conform to, to be?