Climate Change Divide

[Amo]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KPJV4fPZ_oc

The Climate Change issue has divided evolutionists, Christian evolutionists, and young earth creationist Christians. Among all of whom, are members subscribing to both sides of the issue. Each claiming the other side is pushing false and or politically motivated science. Though only one side is calling for, or basically demanding major changes to everyone's life, in accordance with their views.

My question to all who are against all of these changes according to what we view as false, politically motivated science, is to how we must move forward to ensure we do not lose all of our freedoms and liberties? To the political intrigues of the Climate Change doom and gloomers.

All bible believing Christians would agree I think, that even the bible itself predicts increasing natural disasters as the end approaches. Atheistic evolutionists also understand well, that there are and will continue to be times of greatly increased disasters as well. As history itself plainly reveals. We both know and understand as well therefore, that authoritarian supporting elitist minded religious and political leaders, will continually use every present and future natural crisis as opportunities to apply fear mongering politics upon and increasingly dumbed down population.

So what can we do, to stem the tide of tyrannical leadership being further established today and in the future, during such crisis? Which we all know is sure to come. More books and communication akin to the linked video by all of at least the three disciplines mentioned will of course help. What else? Your thoughts please.

[Alan]

Buy an EV 

[Amo]

Buy an EV 

Never. They will have to give me one.

[Alan]

Never. They will have to give me one.

Would you drive it if you were given one?

[Amo]

Would you drive it if you were given one?

I suppose, if I had no gas powered vehicle. Then again, I would probably sell it and buy a gas powered vehicle, if it was truly mine. And gas powered vehicles weren't outlawed at the time. 

[Alan]

I suppose, if I had no gas powered vehicle. Then again, I would probably sell it and buy a gas powered vehicle, if it was truly mine. And gas powered vehicles weren't outlawed at the time. 

I kinda feel the same, I don't dislike electric vehicles, and in a very short time I believe they'll get the issues sorted out. What I don't believe is that it is the defacto choice for the purposes of energy conservation; if everyone switched to electric, the electrical grid would be pushed to the brink, requiring more electrical energy plants and much higher consumer electrical bills. Add to that, the initial cost of an EV is far to high ATT, and who would trust even a slightly used EV?

Give me gas or diesel for as long as I'm allowed.

[Texas Conservative]

At this point, the grid could not handle everyone converting over to EV's.  Not by 2030 or probably 2035 either.

[Texas Conservative]

All this drive towards electrification makes me money. 

So on that side of things, let's keep moving.