News:

Our Hosting and Server Costs Are Expensive! Please Subscribe To Help With Monthly Donations.

Main Menu
+-+-

+-User

Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
 
 
 
Forgot your password?

+-Stats ezBlock

Members
Total Members: 89501
Latest: Reirric
New This Month: 0
New This Week: 0
New Today: 0
Stats
Total Posts: 897379
Total Topics: 90304
Most Online Today: 428
Most Online Ever: 28613
(Thu Aug 06, 2026 - 16:00:30)
Users Online
Members: 1
Guests: 137
Total: 138
4WD
Google (2)

Evidence of Biblical Truth

Started by Bigdog, Wed Apr 02, 2008 - 13:00:38

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Bigdog

 When the Dead Sea scrolls were found. The book of Isaiah was found in two pots they where called part a and part b. The 53rd Chapter was all about Jesus Crucification to get the full understanding one should read it.
The thing is it was written about 700 years before Jesus's birth. Some parts were translated word for word as we have it today. Jesus himself taught from it.
Rob  ::Jesus::

Charles Sloan

The whole thing was word for word, and matched the TR in every respect.

Harold

It would if the TR was Hebrew and not the Greek NT.

The Masoretic Text
The Masortic Text was compiled by the Jewish Masorete scribes in the last few hundred years of the first millenium A.D., with the oldest available editions date between 900 and 1100 AD. It is the Hebrew scriptures used to translate the OT. Its production is legendary and it's accuracy is heralded my many. When compared to the much older Dead Sea Scrolls, it's accuracy is considered by some to be incredible to the point of being miraculous, and does much to prove the accuracy and reliability of the Bible. The scribes themselves went to great pains to be as accurate as possible.

http://www.kjv-only.com/qere.html Interresting read.

FTL


Wycliffes_Shillelagh

Quote from: Charles Sloan on Wed Apr 02, 2008 - 13:05:35
The whole thing was word for word, and matched the TR in every respect.
Well....almost every respect.  There was a difference of a few words.  Nothing that would change doctrine.

Charles Sloan

Quote from: Wycliffes_Shillelagh on Wed Apr 02, 2008 - 18:42:57
Quote from: Charles Sloan on Wed Apr 02, 2008 - 13:05:35
The whole thing was word for word, and matched the TR in every respect.
Well....almost every respect.  There was a difference of a few words.  Nothing that would change doctrine.

I figured someone would say the a-word... But I agree, almost...

But what is amazing this that the copy found predates the birth of Christ by at least 400 years. Which totally squelched the belief that the book of Isaiah was written in the first century. What proof of the Christ fulfilling prophecy!

James Rondon

Before the Dead Sea Scrolls were discovered, some "scholars" were claiming that Isaiah was authored in the first century...

Powered by EzPortal