News:

Buy things on Amazon? Please go to gracecentered.com/amazon FIRST and we'll earn a commission from your order!

Main Menu
+-+-

+-User

Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
 
 
 
Forgot your password?

+-Stats ezBlock

Members
Total Members: 89501
Latest: Reirric
New This Month: 0
New This Week: 0
New Today: 0
Stats
Total Posts: 895734
Total Topics: 90109
Most Online Today: 129
Most Online Ever: 12150
(Tue Mar 18, 2025 - 06:32:52)
Users Online
Members: 0
Guests: 92
Total: 92
Google (2)

The Amazing First Language of Mankind - 111 is Firstborn (Word)

Started by AlephBet, Thu Mar 05, 2015 - 06:27:51

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

AlephBet

Languages is a Seed that makes a root, then branches as a tree.  The Tree of Knowledge is Language.  To know the Aleph Bet (letters / also Father in Hebrew), you must come through the Word (Son). 

Notice how the WORD (111 is Firstborn) is tucked into Genesis 11.  First, who is firstborn over all creation?

Colossians 1

15 The Son is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. 16 For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him. 17 He is before all things, and in him all things hold together.

WORD

Genesis 11:1

Now the whole world had one language and a common speech.

Who is the first one born as the image of God?  Word

What is the Father in Hebrew?  Aleph Bet

 

The Father (Aleph Bet) writes the Word. 

So you don't think this is a cooincidence, read Exodus 11:1

Now the LORD had said to Moses, "I will bring one more plague on Pharaoh and on Egypt. After that, he will let you go from here, and when he does, he will drive you out completely.

Yes.  The killing of the firstborn.  111

www.youtube.com/watch?v=glWG3coAtEg

Jd34

I must just be incredibly stupid or unable to ride the wavelength that you are on AkephBet.. I don't understand what you say half the time. ???

AlephBet

Quote from: Jd34 on Thu Mar 05, 2015 - 06:46:37
I must just be incredibly stupid or unable to ride the wavelength that you are on AkephBet.. I don't understand what you say half the time. ???

Genesis 11:1 (111) is in relation to the firsborn over all creation, also called the WORD in John 1 (Son of God).  The Father is the Aleph Bet.  Aleph Bet is what our language comes from.  We call it alphabet.  ALPHABET writes the Word.  The word Father in Hebrew is Aleph Bet.  He writes the WORD.  Jesus was the Word made flesh.  The Aleph Bet wrote the WORD, who was the Firstborn over all creation.  The Hebrew word fristborn has the Hebrew number equivelant of 111.  In Genesis 11:1, we read about the FIRST language of Man, which is the WORD we spoke, written in HEBREW letters.  The Father (GOD / EL) is the Aleph Bet by title, or the word FATHER, which is spelled Aleph Bet, or Father in Hebrew.  He writes the Word, which is shadowed by letters of DNA making the Son, or firstborn over all creation.  111.  111 is the Hebrew number equivelant to the word Firstborn.  Written by the Aleph Bet (Father). 

I am not unclear.  God is not unclear.  The Word he writes is not unclear.  It's all here to WAKE up our mind to the truth of the Father (Aleph Bet).  First, come through the Word (Son).  No one comes to the Father unless they FIRST come through the Word, which is the reality we are baptized into. 

Watch the video.

Read Exodus 11:1, when the firstborn were put to death to drive out the Hebrews from Egypt (refinery). 


4WD


Red Baker

Quote from: AlephBet on Thu Mar 05, 2015 - 06:54:12Genesis 11:1 (111) is in relation to the firsborn over all creation, also called the WORD in John 1 (Son of God).

You are wrong concerning this point, as I pointed out early in the week, that you did not respond back to (if you did, I did not see it), so what the use to keeping going over the same thing, over and over again. You do have a post that I saw this morning to me, that I will answer. 

The Word in John 1:1 was GOD, not his Son! The Son was conceived by the power of the Highest, and was born of a virgin named Mary two thousand years ago.  That's the record that God has given to us to believe and stand upon.   If I am wrong, then prove it.  Go to my post to you early this week, were I said a few things.

Wycliffes_Shillelagh

Quote from: Jd34 on Thu Mar 05, 2015 - 06:46:37
I must just be incredibly stupid or unable to ride the wavelength that you are on AkephBet.. I don't understand what you say half the time. ???
In this thread, the main thing is a basic understanding of the Hebrew language.

The Hebrew word for "father" is AB, as in "abba Father."

The Hebrew alphabet is called the AlephBet, because the names of the first two letters in Hebrew are Aleph (A) and Bet (B).

Alphabet = Aleph Bet = AB = Father.  That's what he's pointing out.

Hopefully I made it clearer.  ::tippinghat::

Jarrod


Wycliffes_Shillelagh

The video is solid info.  Not sure that there's a point you're driving towards here.  Just trying to educate a bit?

Jarrod

ginger rabbit

I stopped listening when the narrator began to carry forth his thesis based on the young Earth time table.
Homo sapiens sapiens appeared about 130,000 years ago. Semi-permanent human settlements according to the archaeological record of discoveries would place those settlements at about 10,000 B.C.. With the cradle of civilization appearing in what is now Iran area.

This guys trying to go by the Hebrew tradition so as to confine the whole world to a small block of origin. 6,000 year old Earth is preposterous.

Wycliffes_Shillelagh

Quote from: ginger rabbit on Thu Mar 05, 2015 - 12:33:39
I stopped listening when the narrator began to carry forth his thesis based on the young Earth time table.
Homo sapiens sapiens appeared about 130,000 years ago. Semi-permanent human settlements according to the archaeological record of discoveries would place those settlements at about 10,000 B.C.. With the cradle of civilization appearing in what is now Iran area.

This guys trying to go by the Hebrew tradition so as to confine the whole world to a small block of origin. 6,000 year old Earth is preposterous.
I am an Old Earth guy, too.

But phonetic language is not that old.  It started with the Phoenicians (hence, phonetic).  The Phoenicians ARE the Canaanites from the Bible.  They appear in history exactly after the time at which the Bible places the Tower of Babel account (early Bronze age - roughly 2200BC).

The Tower of Babel itself is a historical certainty. A stele was uncovered by archaeologists which included an elevation of the tower and partial floorplan. And the ruins of the tower still exist.  Google "E-temenanki."  That was the name the Babylonians gave the tower.  E-Temenanki translates as "house of the foundations of heaven and earth."

Ruins:


Jarrod

edit: removed pictures, those were bigger than I thought...

ginger rabbit

Tower of Babel is simply the rendering for Tower of Babylon.


The bible myth has its parallel in the story of Enmerkar and the Lord of Aratta.
Aside from the biblical narrative as pertains to the famed Tower of Babel there is no evidence there was ever one language spoken the world over. 

Wycliffes_Shillelagh

Quote from: ginger rabbit on Thu Mar 05, 2015 - 14:50:35
Tower of Babel is simply the rendering for Tower of Babylon.

The bible myth has its parallel in the story of Enmerkar and the Lord of Aratta.
Aside from the biblical narrative as pertains to the famed Tower of Babel there is no evidence there was ever one language spoken the world over. 
Babel is a city.  Babylon is a province (whose capital was Babel).

Thanks for the link.  I don't disagree that it is the same story, nor that the earth is old, neither do I think that all the world spoke one language.

But I DO think that the methodology used in analyzing so-called "Edenics," as portrayed in the OP and video, is valid from a linguistic standpoint.  It is the best available theory (IMO) of how mankind moved from runic language (logograms) to phonetic language (phonograms).

As far as the "confusion" of languages, I believe the modern interpretation is BACKWARDS.  One unified spoken language did not fracture into many.  Language does not work this way.  Rather, many spoken languages came into contact with each other for a prolonged period (the result of a massive collaborative building project?), and the end result was a a synthesis of those languages.

Language does work that way, and we can observe it right now.  When two groups with different languages combine, the languages also combine.  For instance, in the southern U.S., Spanish and English are merging in a bastard language affectionately known as Spanglish by those who speak it.

Going back to the Middle East during the Bronze Age -

There were many different spoken languages in the Middle East, but they all shared a single written language - cuneiform.  The tablets unearthed at Amarna (and many other places) confirm that the kings of Babel, Hatti, and Mittani all shared the cuneiform written language with each other.  Yet they would read that single language with entirely different pronunciations.

I do believe that the creation of phonetic language came about as a result of actively trying to solve this problem.  Necessity is the mother of invention.

Jarrod

AlephBet

Quote from: Red Baker on Thu Mar 05, 2015 - 07:05:07
Quote from: AlephBet on Thu Mar 05, 2015 - 06:54:12Genesis 11:1 (111) is in relation to the firstborn over all creation, also called the WORD in John 1 (Son of God).

You are wrong concerning this point, as I pointed out early in the week, that you did not respond back to (if you did, I did not see it), so what the use to keeping going over the same thing, over and over again. You do have a post that I saw this morning to me, that I will answer. 

The Word in John 1:1 was GOD, not his Son! The Son was conceived by the power of the Highest, and was born of a virgin named Mary two thousand years ago.  That's the record that God has given to us to believe and stand upon.   If I am wrong, then prove it.  Go to my post to you early this week, were I said a few things.

Note the parallel in Red:

John 1

1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. 2 He was with God in the beginning. 3 Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made. 4 In him was life, and that life was the light of all mankind. 5 The light shines in the darkness, and the darkness has not overcome it.

Colossians 1

15 The Son is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. 16 For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him. 17 He is before all things, and in him all things hold together. 18 And he is the head of the body, the church; he is the beginning and the firstborn from among the dead, so that in everything he might have the supremacy. 19 For God was pleased to have all his fullness dwell in him, 20 and through him to reconcile to himself all things, whether things on earth or things in heaven, by making peace through his blood, shed on the cross.

Is Colossians speaking of Jesus, the Son of God on the cross?  Yes. 

1 Peter 3

It saves you by the resurrection of Jesus Christ, 22 who has gone into heaven and is at God's right hand—with angels, authorities and powers in submission to him.

The New Testament does not speak of a separate Son.  Christ is the eternal Son, or the Lamb whose blood was shed from the FOUNDATION of creation. 

Revelation 13:8

All inhabitants of the earth will worship the beast--all whose names have not been written in the Lamb's book of life, the Lamb who was slain from the creation of the world.

Are you implying that the Lamb is NOT the Son of God (Christ)?  I think you would have a hard time selling that to anyone who has read the Bible.  Word is the Son of God. 

John 1 tells you this:

14 The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the one and only Son, who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.

In review, the Firstborn is Jesus / Adam First and Last (Aleph Tav). 

Hebrew 1:6 - And again, when God brings his firstborn into the world, he says, "Let all God's angels worship him."

Who is he speaking of here in Hebrews 1:6?


AlephBet

Quote from: Wycliffes_Shillelagh on Thu Mar 05, 2015 - 12:20:24
The video is solid info.  Not sure that there's a point you're driving towards here.  Just trying to educate a bit?

Jarrod

Yes.  Also, the WORD is written with letters (Aleph Bet).  Father is the author of the Son (Word), as well as the Word we read to know the Son.  DNA is a shadow of the same Word from letters. 

AlephBet

Quote from: Wycliffes_Shillelagh on Thu Mar 05, 2015 - 12:20:24
The video is solid info.  Not sure that there's a point you're driving towards here.  Just trying to educate a bit?

Jarrod

I'm trying to show how amazing it is that no one has noticed that Alpeh Bet writes the Word.  Literally, I am the ONLY person on the Internet saying this.  I have been saying it for years.  To know the Father (Letters of Hebrew), we must know the Word (Son).  This is parallel to what Jesus said after stating he was the Way, Truth and Life.  Anyone who knows what the Way represents would recognize it from all Eastern Religion (including Judaism, which is Eastern) as righteousness.  Truth is Philosophy (West).  He makes one new humanity from the two. 

Ephesians 2:15

by setting aside in his flesh the law with its commands and regulations. His purpose was to create in himself one new humanity out of the two, thus making peace,

Of course, letters of the East write toward Jerusalem.  Letters of the West write toward Jerusalem.  No mistake in this.  I am only scratching the surface here on what can be found.  My hope is that more people start the process to know the Father (Aleph Bet).  No way to know Him apart from the Word, which we all likely know well.  The letters and true names in the Bible are the Keys to knowledge. 

Luke 11:52

"Woe to you experts in the law, because you have taken away the key to knowledge. You yourselves have not entered, and you have hindered those who were entering."



AlephBet

Quote from: ginger rabbit on Thu Mar 05, 2015 - 12:33:39
I stopped listening when the narrator began to carry forth his thesis based on the young Earth time table.
Homo sapiens sapiens appeared about 130,000 years ago. Semi-permanent human settlements according to the archaeological record of discoveries would place those settlements at about 10,000 B.C.. With the cradle of civilization appearing in what is now Iran area.

This guys trying to go by the Hebrew tradition so as to confine the whole world to a small block of origin. 6,000 year old Earth is preposterous.

Time dilation accounts for six literal days being 14 billion years within the span of time by God's perspective, not ours.  Both perspectives are true.  Think of the unwinding of the golden mean in a ratio of 1:1.618.  The first day is the largest.  The last the smallest until we reach a new singularity and it starts over. 

www.youtube.com/watch?v=YNFHJB3oSw0




AlephBet

Quote from: Wycliffes_Shillelagh on Thu Mar 05, 2015 - 14:16:24
Quote from: ginger rabbit on Thu Mar 05, 2015 - 12:33:39
I stopped listening when the narrator began to carry forth his thesis based on the young Earth time table.
Homo sapiens sapiens appeared about 130,000 years ago. Semi-permanent human settlements according to the archaeological record of discoveries would place those settlements at about 10,000 B.C.. With the cradle of civilization appearing in what is now Iran area.

This guys trying to go by the Hebrew tradition so as to confine the whole world to a small block of origin. 6,000 year old Earth is preposterous.
I am an Old Earth guy, too.

But phonetic language is not that old.  It started with the Phoenicians (hence, phonetic).  The Phoenicians ARE the Canaanites from the Bible.  They appear in history exactly after the time at which the Bible places the Tower of Babel account (early Bronze age - roughly 2200BC).

The Tower of Babel itself is a historical certainty. A stele was uncovered by archaeologists which included an elevation of the tower and partial floorplan. And the ruins of the tower still exist.  Google "E-temenanki."  That was the name the Babylonians gave the tower.  E-Temenanki translates as "house of the foundations of heaven and earth."

Ruins:


Jarrod

edit: removed pictures, those were bigger than I thought...

Wow!  Really interesting.  I googled the tern, then went to images.  Very nice. 

Victor08

Quote from: Wycliffes_Shillelagh on Thu Mar 05, 2015 - 15:29:28
Thanks for the link.  I don't disagree that it is the same story, nor that the earth is old, neither do I think that all the world spoke one language.

But I DO think that the methodology used in analyzing so-called "Edenics," as portrayed in the OP and video, is valid from a linguistic standpoint.  It is the best available theory (IMO) of how mankind moved from runic language (logograms) to phonetic language (phonograms).

As far as the "confusion" of languages, I believe the modern interpretation is BACKWARDS.  One unified spoken language did not fracture into many.  Language does not work this way.  Rather, many spoken languages came into contact with each other for a prolonged period (the result of a massive collaborative building project?), and the end result was a a synthesis of those languages.

Language does work that way, and we can observe it right now.  When two groups with different languages combine, the languages also combine.  For instance, in the southern U.S., Spanish and English are merging in a bastard language affectionately known as Spanglish by those who speak it.
Jarrod
SO, you don't believe this happened.

Gen.11
[1] And the whole earth was of one language, and of one speech.
[2] And it came to pass, as they journeyed from the east, that they found a plain in the land of Shinar; and they dwelt there.
[3] And they said one to another, Go to, let us make brick, and burn them throughly. And they had brick for stone, and slime had they for morter.
[4] And they said, Go to, let us build us a city and a tower, whose top may reach unto heaven; and let us make us a name, lest we be scattered abroad upon the face of the whole earth.
[5] And the LORD came down to see the city and the tower, which the children of men builded.
[6] And the LORD said, Behold, the people is one, and they have all one language; and this they begin to do: and now nothing will be restrained from them, which they have imagined to do.
[7] Go to, let us go down, and there confound their language, that they may not understand one another's speech.
[8] So the LORD scattered them abroad from thence upon the face of all the earth: and they left off to build the city.
[9] Therefore is the name of it called Babel; because the LORD did there confound the language of all the earth: and from thence did the LORD scatter them abroad upon the face of all the earth.


By the way, I grew up in Miami and spoke a little Spanglish.

Wycliffes_Shillelagh

Quote from: Victor08 on Thu Mar 05, 2015 - 15:51:31
SO, you don't believe this happened.

Gen.11
[1] And the whole earth was of one language, and of one speech.
[2] And it came to pass, as they journeyed from the east, that they found a plain in the land of Shinar; and they dwelt there.
[3] And they said one to another, Go to, let us make brick, and burn them throughly. And they had brick for stone, and slime had they for morter.
[4] And they said, Go to, let us build us a city and a tower, whose top may reach unto heaven; and let us make us a name, lest we be scattered abroad upon the face of the whole earth.
[5] And the LORD came down to see the city and the tower, which the children of men builded.
[6] And the LORD said, Behold, the people is one, and they have all one language; and this they begin to do: and now nothing will be restrained from them, which they have imagined to do.
[7] Go to, let us go down, and there confound their language, that they may not understand one another's speech.
[8] So the LORD scattered them abroad from thence upon the face of all the earth: and they left off to build the city.
[9] Therefore is the name of it called Babel; because the LORD did there confound the language of all the earth: and from thence did the LORD scatter them abroad upon the face of all the earth.

By the way, I grew up in Miami and spoke a little Spanglish.
I speak a little Spanglish, too.  What are the chances that my Spanglish (from Arizona) is like yours (from Florida)?  There's some stuff in common, but then there's stuff that's not.  You sabe what I digo?

Let's say two people groups come together and their languages merge.  Does 1 consolidated language come out of it?  Nope.  Several different combinations of the languages emerge.  And those
people can't necessarily understand each other.

Now add more languages to the mix, and the whole thing blows up.  Consider Louisiana.  Spanish + English + French = what?  Cajun?  Creole?  Spanglish?  Frenglish?  Franish?  All of the above.

So, I believe that their languages got confused, all right.  Just not quite in the same way that most people do.

Jarrod

AlephBet

Quote from: Wycliffes_Shillelagh on Thu Mar 05, 2015 - 15:29:28
Quote from: ginger rabbit on Thu Mar 05, 2015 - 14:50:35
Tower of Babel is simply the rendering for Tower of Babylon.

The bible myth has its parallel in the story of Enmerkar and the Lord of Aratta.
Aside from the biblical narrative as pertains to the famed Tower of Babel there is no evidence there was ever one language spoken the world over. 

But I DO think that the methodology used in analyzing so-called "Edenics," as portrayed in the OP and video, is valid from a linguistic standpoint.  It is the best available theory (IMO) of how mankind moved from runic language (logograms) to phonetic language (phonograms).

As far as the "confusion" of languages, I believe the modern interpretation is BACKWARDS.  One unified spoken language did not fracture into many.  Language does not work this way.  Rather, many spoken languages came into contact with each other for a prolonged period (the result of a massive collaborative building project?), and the end result was a a synthesis of those languages.

Language does work that way, and we can observe it right now.  When two groups with different languages combine, the languages also combine.  For instance, in the southern U.S., Spanish and English are merging in a bastard language affectionately known as Spanglish by those who speak it.

Jarrod

I could show you different with 10,000 examples just like this.  Let me give you one that cannot be denied.  Hebrew to English.

Ear in Hebrew has the same double meaning as our ear.  We say ear of seed, but know that the ear is also the place where we behold information. 

Adding a Hey to Ear makes HEAR, or behold the seed.



Adding a Tav to Hear, you get Heart, or the soil where the seed expresses.  Taking it to heart is a good description to this.  The Heart is the soil of the ear (seed).



Moving the Hey to the end of the word links, you get this:

EartH.  Earth is the literal soil where we behold. 

It gets deeper. In the Hebrew lexicon, there are three words with the spelling for Ear (EAR, HEAR and BALANCE).  They are spelled this way:

Aleph Zan Nun



Strength to cut the seed.  What is the ability of the Ear to Balance the body?  With two sacks of water in balance.  The Cochlea looks just like a Hebrew Bet (house). 



There is just no way to deny this.

From the Lexicon:

Balance:
A pair of scales used for weighing. From the ear
as the place where balance is determined. 

www.youtube.com/watch?v=wGxeBwtBOYA




Buster D Body Crab

That sounds like a huge stretch for the discipline of Hyper Physics.

I think what a lot of these kind of threads miss when Christians attempt to decipherthe  the Hebrew is that the Hebrews were all about the Gematria. Letters in the Hebrew alphabet corresponded to numbers. The entire Tanakh is a hidden message, or what is defined as an esoteric message.And using numbers to communicate a deeper message and future prophecy.
That's why there are certain numbers that are consistent throughout both the Old and New Testaments. 3, 7, 9. 12.

Some take the scripture in John 1 verse 1: In the beginning was the word and the word was with God and the word was God, to refer to the Bible or the Tanakh.



It is said to be far more than that. Sound, vibration, sacred geometry, are all textual components in the Tanakh and the New Testament. The tree of life, etc...

AlephBet

Quote from: Buster D Body Crab on Thu Mar 05, 2015 - 16:43:14
That sounds like a huge stretch for the discipline of Hyper Physics.

I think what a lot of these kind of threads miss when Christians attempt to decipherthe  the Hebrew is that the Hebrews were all about the Gematria. Letters in the Hebrew alphabet corresponded to numbers. The entire Tanakh is a hidden message, or what is defined as an esoteric message.And using numbers to communicate a deeper message and future prophecy.
That's why there are certain numbers that are consistent throughout both the Old and New Testaments. 3, 7, 9. 12.

Some take the scripture in John 1 verse 1: In the beginning was the word and the word was with God and the word was God, to refer to the Bible or the Tanakh.



It is said to be far more than that. Sound, vibration, sacred geometry, are all textual components in the Tanakh and the New Testament. The tree of life, etc...

Yes.  Four levels of meaning in scripture.

Peshat (פְּשָׁט) — "surface" ("straight") or the literal (direct) meaning.[1]

Remez (רֶמֶז) — "hints" or the deep (allegoric: hidden or symbolic) meaning beyond just the literal sense.

Derash (דְּרַשׁ) — from Hebrew darash: "inquire" ("seek") — the comparative (midrashic) meaning, as given through similar occurrences.

Sod (סוֹד) (pronounced with a long O as in 'sore') — "secret" ("mystery") or the esoteric/mystical meaning, as given through inspiration or revelation.

The numbers interconnect seemingly unrelated passages.  Looking deeper reveals layers of the onion.  It's endless (infinite) and written like you would expect from a quantum computation that is ongoing. 


Jd34

Quote from: Wycliffes_Shillelagh on Thu Mar 05, 2015 - 12:18:38
Quote from: Jd34 on Thu Mar 05, 2015 - 06:46:37
I must just be incredibly stupid or unable to ride the wavelength that you are on AkephBet.. I don't understand what you say half the time. ???
In this thread, the main thing is a basic understanding of the Hebrew language.

The Hebrew word for "father" is AB, as in "abba Father."

The Hebrew alphabet is called the AlephBet, because the names of the first two letters in Hebrew are Aleph (A) and Bet (B).

Alphabet = Aleph Bet = AB = Father.  That's what he's pointing out.

Hopefully I made it clearer.  ::tippinghat::

Jarrod

Yeah, I don't know Hebrew( wished I did) but I can understand how that can create a gap of not understanding.  It's the part of AlephBet's reasoning in " connecting the dots"  that I see as utterly BS. Maybe it's because I don't know Hebrew.

By the way, I am an old earth guy too. I know it's a relentless debate but always fun to revisit. DaveW, made me take a step or to back aboutthe 24 hour old adult Adam. Hmm?   ::pondering::

New topic someone should start up again..


Wycliffes_Shillelagh

Quote from: AlephBet on Thu Mar 05, 2015 - 16:06:07
Quote from: Wycliffes_Shillelagh on Thu Mar 05, 2015 - 15:29:28
Quote from: ginger rabbit on Thu Mar 05, 2015 - 14:50:35
Tower of Babel is simply the rendering for Tower of Babylon.

The bible myth has its parallel in the story of Enmerkar and the Lord of Aratta.
Aside from the biblical narrative as pertains to the famed Tower of Babel there is no evidence there was ever one language spoken the world over. 

But I DO think that the methodology used in analyzing so-called "Edenics," as portrayed in the OP and video, is valid from a linguistic standpoint.  It is the best available theory (IMO) of how mankind moved from runic language (logograms) to phonetic language (phonograms).

As far as the "confusion" of languages, I believe the modern interpretation is BACKWARDS.  One unified spoken language did not fracture into many.  Language does not work this way.  Rather, many spoken languages came into contact with each other for a prolonged period (the result of a massive collaborative building project?), and the end result was a a synthesis of those languages.

Language does work that way, and we can observe it right now.  When two groups with different languages combine, the languages also combine.  For instance, in the southern U.S., Spanish and English are merging in a bastard language affectionately known as Spanglish by those who speak it.

Jarrod

I could show you different with 10,000 examples just like this.  Let me give you one that cannot be denied.  Hebrew to English.
This doesn't prove that the entire earth had a unified language, nor can any Hebrew->other language example do so.  It only demonstrates that all phonetic languages derive from a single phonetic language. 

This isn't exactly groundbreaking news.  We already know that Phonetic languages all inherit from the ancient Phoenician language (aka Northern Semitic), or to be more precise, from the language group it is in, Semitic.  Ancient Hebrew IS a dialect of Semitic (Western Semitic).  So it isn't very surprising that phonetic languages inherit from it...

But, you have disregarded the existence of runic languages, of which there were many.  We can prove their existence empirically by looking at the stuff we dig up from time periods before the Bible was written.

What is more interesting, and worthy of debate, is how that first phonetic language came to exist.  We know that it includes the process of agglutination.  Did that come from Ugaritic or Sumerian, or somewhere else?  Are its logograms borrowed from Egyptian hieroglyphs, or something else less famous?  But mostly, who first attached a single phoneme to a single logogram in a one-to-one correspondence?  That was the master stroke that resulted in phonetic language coming to exist. 

And where did that happen?  The most likely candidate is the old Phoenician/Canaanite city of Byblos (Gubla, Gebal), which name/word is also the same as our words Bible, babble, gibberish, and blather, as well as the Greek words for both papyrus and books.  It was also the site of an ancient and famous library.  See Ezekiel 27:9.

Jarrod

Jd34

Knowing God, it's my personal take on things that  just maybe the feller is on to something. Knowing God tells me probably not.


Connecting dots that don't  connect.



Jd34

The word? What about the word? I hear words all day long.

Sad to to think that people use the word as a crutch.. Just sad

AlephBet

Quote from: Jd34 on Fri Mar 06, 2015 - 02:06:53
The word? What about the word? I hear words all day long.

Sad to to think that people use the word as a crutch.. Just sad

Trace the steps back.  Physicists say that we information.  The universe is digital and a hologram.

Evidence from Nobel Laureates.  Not my words, but theirs. 

www.youtube.com/watch?v=PKkiy24LqBQ

POINT ONE: Okay.  From Today's science, I have reason to say that Word is written with letters into the fabric of our reality.

POINT TWO: DNA

Is DNA a digital letters sequence making proteins, thereby rendering life as we know it in all living forms?  Yes.  Is it a tree of life?

POINT THREE: Is the Hebrew Language Bible a sequence of letters with meaning, branching into words like a tree?  Yes.  It's the primary language of mankind doing this type of root morphology.  It's unique in this.   Is it a tree of knowledge?  Yes. 

POINT FOUR: Did God call his Son the Word?  Yes.

POINT FIVE:  Is God's title as Father of a Son (WORD) Aleph Bet?

Yes.

Where have I gone wrong?

Heaven proclaims it.

Earth reveals it.

The Son stated it as naming himself the Bread of Life.  The word Son in Hebrew is Bet Nun (House of Seed).



Have I made an error even once in my reasoning?  No.

Seed (letters of DNA) in a cup of water (Mother's womb) makes a Son (House of Seed called WORD).  Letters write words.  Words can be copied and saved.  Book of Life. 

I believe I have covered it clearly with NO mistakes. 

AS IF this were not enough, did you read this post on the EAR?  Ears must open in soil.


+-Recent Topics

Powered by EzPortal