Christian Forums

I looked at it and didn't see a "none of the above" option..........did I just miss it?

Why didn't you ask on that thread?

Quote from: p.rehbein on Thu Feb 23, 2012 - 06:33:21
I looked at it and didn't see a "none of the above" option..........did I just miss it?

None of the above = Obama.

Quote from: Alfred Combes on Fri Feb 24, 2012 - 09:54:17

Quote from: p.rehbein on Thu Feb 23, 2012 - 06:33:21
I looked at it and didn't see a "none of the above" option..........did I just miss it?

None of the above = Obama.

.......so how much did Jaime reward you for that plug?

Common sense requires no reward.

The "none of the abovers" will serve Obama well in his re-election bid.

Quote from: Jaime on Fri May 04, 2012 - 21:01:21
Common sense requires no reward.

The "none of the abovers" will serve Obama well in his re-election bid.

.............same old tired song...........

Might be tired but it is just as true as it ever was. How is it not true? I can accept tired because of folks refusal to accept plain as the nose on your face truth.

I only wish a bunch of liberal voters would take the none of the above approach, it would help the GOP as well. It's as dependable as the sunrise.  Some have in the past and wasted their votes on Nader, thus helping to elect George Bush in 2000. All I can say is thank you to them, as Obama will say to the none of the above conservatives. All votes cast or not cast by a likely voter out of frustration add to or subtract from someone. Votes are never just benignly cast FOR someone. There is ALWAYS an against component, that helps who we least want to help. Also, both sides in a political campaign try to gin up the complacency voters to stay home. A voter on the other side convinced to stay home is as good as a vote cast for your side. A -1 for them is the same as a +1 for us.

If not, why not?

I'm moving this discussion to the politics forum. Jaime, feel free to move it back if you disagree.

Good move, I didn't even look to see what forum it was in.