Catholicism is wrong

desertknight · Fri Mar 19, 2010 - 21:18:18

Yes, over the course of the whole reading cycle, the whole Bible is read in the missals.

Selene · Fri Mar 19, 2010 - 21:21:57

Quote from: desertknight on Fri Mar 19, 2010 - 21:18:18
Yes, over the course of the whole reading cycle, the whole Bible is read in the missals.

You might have to define "reading cycle." He might not understand what that means.

desertknight · Fri Mar 19, 2010 - 21:28:16

Quote from: Selene on Fri Mar 19, 2010 - 21:21:57
Quote from: desertknight on Fri Mar 19, 2010 - 21:18:18
Yes, over the course of the whole reading cycle, the whole Bible is read in the missals.

You might have to define "reading cycle." He might not understand what that means.

I'm afraid of confusing him again, but suffice it to say, DAN, that it is a three year cycle. Readings from Holy Scripture are divided up and given by the calendar date. That is why I said that as an example, at Mass today, the readings were...

First Reading: Second Samuel 7:4-5, 12-14, 16
Responsorial Psalm: Psalms 89:2-3, 4-5, 27, 29
Second Reading: Romans 4:13, 16-18, 22
Gospel: Matthew 1:16, 18-21, 24

...that is how it is done. Each sermon usually is directly linked to the day's readings. Each time it will be different until eventually, the entire Bible is read.

DAN1 · Fri Mar 19, 2010 - 21:48:37

Quote from: desertknight on Fri Mar 19, 2010 - 21:18:18
Yes, over the course of the whole reading cycle, the whole Bible is read in the missals.

Thank you for clarifying. What threw me was the word "Missal," [singular] now you have made it clear its Missals [plureal]

larry2 · Sun Mar 21, 2010 - 21:29:17

Bump

JustChristian · Mon Mar 22, 2010 - 12:30:32

Hi!

Former Catholic here. That's quite a hit-and-run. Some sort of explanation seems in order.

In Christ,
Nancy :)

winsome · Mon Mar 22, 2010 - 13:15:18

Quote from: JustChristian on Mon Mar 22, 2010 - 12:30:32
Hi!

Former Catholic here. That's quite a hit-and-run. Some sort of explanation seems in order.

In Christ,
Nancy :)

What do you think is missing Nancy?

And welcome to the forum.

JustChristian · Mon Mar 22, 2010 - 13:58:48

Quote from: winsome on Mon Mar 22, 2010 - 13:15:18
Quote from: JustChristian on Mon Mar 22, 2010 - 12:30:32
Hi!

Former Catholic here. That's quite a hit-and-run. Some sort of explanation seems in order.

In Christ,
Nancy :)

What do you think is missing Nancy?

And welcome to the forum.

Thanks for the welcome!

Missing is his reason for believing that "Catholicism is a heretical lie derived by satan to mislead the church of christ". It's quite a loaded statement. A bit much to just leave as is.

In Christ,
Nancy :)

winsome · Mon Mar 22, 2010 - 14:04:42

Quote from: JustChristian on Mon Mar 22, 2010 - 13:58:48
Quote from: winsome on Mon Mar 22, 2010 - 13:15:18
Quote from: JustChristian on Mon Mar 22, 2010 - 12:30:32
Hi!

Former Catholic here. That's quite a hit-and-run. Some sort of explanation seems in order.

In Christ,
Nancy :)

What do you think is missing Nancy?

And welcome to the forum.

Thanks for the welcome!

Missing is his reason for believing that "Catholicism is a heretical lie derived by satan to mislead the church of christ". It's quite a loaded statement. A bit much to just leave as is.

In Christ,
Nancy :)

Covered by Rob in reply #2. I think gothruchrist lost interest in the thread a long time ago. Looks like a "hit and run" OP.

Christian Forums

News:

User

Stats ezBlock

Catholicism is wrong

desertknight

Selene

desertknight

DAN1

larry2

JustChristian

winsome

JustChristian

winsome

Recent Topics

Login:
Password:
Login for: